- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
He went to court over it and got some kind of hardship exception for the code violation, so it implies it was his all along. But yes it seems like a very purposeless fence to the point it ought to belong to the apartment instead.It doesn’t even enclose his entire back yard; it’s just a privacy fence between his property and the section 8 next door. The idea that it was never his fence based on the side facing his property, and he simply tore out and replaced somone else’s privacy fence in his own ignorance, is really funny.
I have no doubt funsters were emailing the con a lot and any organizer following up on that and looking into Pat's history of engaging the stalker childs would conclude it's easier just to not have him headline an event. They probably memory holed him because they figure removing mentions of him might reduce the chances of additional pest activity. I'm just speculating though. He probably didn't take it well unless they were smart enough to lie about the reason.The fact they actually removed his name, though, suggests he pissed someone off. Said "no, little baby child" to the wrong person. Or maybe his misogynist attacks against that literary agent have caught up with him.
Last edited: