Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

so the soyence is now saying that the age of women doesn’t matter at all and now it’s all the man.

What's the reason given for this? I can buy that age plays a role for both men and women, but it sounds like absolute bullshit to say a woman's age has no effect.

 

[Jacknife]

I'm 26 and I've already wasted my entire life.

If you do not have crippling debt, permanent illnesses or drug habits I think you will befine

 

[Clem Fandango]

This circle is great.

Yeah, it's pretty cozy. And frankly there's not even that much woman-hating going on in here most of the time. But it's nice to have a place to vent.

 

[Johnny Salami]

What's the reason given for this? I can buy that age plays a role for both men and women, but it sounds like absolute bullshit to say a woman's age has no effect.

They dont want white women having kids so they tell them to keep being a boss babe. But they also don't want them too angry and need some simp to marry them so the old hag doesn't rebel against the system.

 

[bile demon]

If you're looking for me to comfort you on bad decisions, that's too bad, I'm not going to.

Soyence supports my position.

From your personal experience and taking into account what science says about the matter, would you rate your decision to become a fat faggot with bitch tits as good or bad in respect to fulfilling your desire to start a family?

 

[Null]

Must have struck a nerve. Sorry for your feelings.

 

[bile demon]

Must have struck a nerve. Sorry for your feelings.

Aw, don't worry about it. I'll go soothe my hurt feelings by hugging my wife girlfriend and playing with my son. I suggested you do the same whenever the misogynists in this thread make you upset.

 

[The Punished Mitch]

Prior to the Title IX thread I never actually realized just how all consuming the femoid obsession with legally being permitted to kill children was. In the thread itself I initially thought I was just reading the ramblings of one or two fringe lunatics but after being directed to the man-hate thread there appears to be virtually no opposition to the notion that being given legal permission to kill children supersedes even the most basic self preservation instincts in femoids.

Is ( thinking about ) killing children the femoid equivalent of cooming? Coomers, in the absence of a healthy, natural sexual development need ever escalating material to satiate their gooning desires. Are femoids with an insatiable bloodlust with regards to children simply gooners, their inability to satiate natural desires twisted and corrupted towards the unnatural? Or is being singularly obsessed with killing children simply the natural state of the femoid, the promise of ever expanding carnage dangled like a carrot by certain political entities to enable their agenda to pass without too many complications?

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

I'm not saying age isn't a factor, but I'm pretty damn sure having three baby-mommas and nine kids might be a bigger factor in why the kids would be fucked up.

I agree that a man that has the explicit goal of knocking up 3 baby mommas and getting 9 kids will probably end up with 9 fucked up kids. But not because of the man's age or race, but because he's fucked up. Like father, like son/daughter.

1. X/2+7 is about if your relationship is creepy, not fertility.

For context, this rule was brought up in the middle of a monologue about the fertility (or lack of) aspect of age gap relationships so forgive me if I thought you were making a comment on fertility with regards to X/2+7.

I'm not particularly interested in the "creepy" debate because:
1) The word "creepy" is a flexible word that can mean whatever the person (usually woman) saying it wants it to mean. It's no different from "racist" or "fascist" I'm sure you'd understand.
2) Only fags, male feminists and women use the word creepy and I don't particularly care for their opinions on the matter (see point 1 above).

2. Soyence supports my position. Sorry if you don't like this statistic and it makes you upset, but it's true.

The soyence I've looked at says that to maximize a child's health and potential, both father and mother should be young and fertile (anywhere between teens and low to mid 20s depending on the soyence). The soyence I've looked at also says that, in respect to fertility, age negatively affects women more harshly than men. True, men's sperm count and quality will decline as he ages but as long as he still has his sex drive, he can still reproduce at older ages. For women, their egg quality drops around 30 and is basically dead at 40. Hence the empty egg carton meme (sorry women, if you don't like this meme and it makes you upset, but it's funny).

The "old man young woman age gap = bad fertility" argument is new to me. It could be because I haven't educated myself about it yet or it's not true.

That's also ignoring the fact that Soyence (tm) is often pozzed, fake and gay. You of all people should be doubting the Soyence (tm). The same Soyence that supports "life affirming" care by recommending young people to chop their dicks off and slice their tits off.

3. You're not Ghengis Khan, you're a faggot.

That is true, I am not Ghengis Khan.

Hope this helps.

Not really, but I appreciate you taking the time to reply to my post and running this website. Even if you did call me a faggot.

40s and 50s is too old to have a kid as a man. Forget the "biological clock" elements. Do you want to be getting up at 3am to put a baby back to sleep in your 40s? Shit's too tiring. Also, you don't want to be a super old dad. Teaching your son to drive when you're in your late 60s? Taking them out for a beer for the first time when you're in your 70s??

Nah, get that shit done in your 30s. I know it's fun to clown on "empty egg carton" femoids, but seriously guys shouldn't wait around just because they "can".

Let's go with the "forget the biological clock" assumption so I can somewhat agree that waiting to have children as an older man can be physically tiring.

But we can't forget the "financial" element. And older man is more likely to have a higher income/more assets which he can use to support his wife and children. Younger men are still learning and/or working a lower end job so are less able to provide for a family.

The counter-argument of course are the welfare niggers and Muslims who pop out 10 children and are financially supported by the State but that's another story.

Of course, most people don't minmax their relationships like a fucking video game and you get the woman you get when you wait until 40 to stop being a manchild like Juju.

The idea that anyone who can and wants to have kids is going to go out of their way to trust the soyence about the exact optimal age/income bracket/whatever other inane bullshit factor you can think of to have them at is frankly retarded. For better or worse, no one in the real world micromanages their behavior to that autistic a degree and never will unless they're forced to at gunpoint.

I think the main demographic that approaches anything close to "minmaxing like a video game" are the higher IQ/higher income earners. Eg "honey, we're not ready to start a family yet, let's wait until I get that promotion" "let's wait until we get a house first, the apartment we're living in is too small for a family" AKA the idiocracy effect.

For most people, they just fuck cos it feels good bruh. (see previous comment about niggers and Muslims)

Science is totally corrupted and pozzed, unless it verifies up the comforting delusions of me and my dead egger friends, in which case its totally based and true!

Science is good! Until it hurts the feelings of women. Then it is bad and should be ignored or overwritten with science that is more friendly to females.

We’ll eventually find out if the child Al Pacino had when he was 83 will be autistic or not (the mother was 29 when they had their child). The children Clint Eastwood had when he was in his 50s and 60s didn’t end up autistic either. I’m not saying autism isn’t an increased risk due to age but as always, the man hate foids and their simps reach the most extreme and retarded conclusions possible in order to provide purestrain cope for the empty egg carton set. The chance autism can happen means it is guaranteed to happen to the moids over 30 years old who don’t want to have sex with them. Also the increased risk of autism and birth defects from children born to women over 35 is not true because lol smol peepee lol incel.

Al Pacino and Clint Eastwood is a small data set but it's a start I guess. Null would probably bet on the child of Al Pacino (83) and the mother (29) being retarded/autistic so we'll come back to this post in 10 years.

For the longest time it was accepted that autism and other such risks rates correlated more or less more with the mother's age, since women don't continually replenish eggs like men do sperm. But in the last five or so years there's been a major push to reframe it as those defects being the fault of men's aging.

I'm a bit dubious of it, because it doesn't really make sense to me. Plus I have a hard time trusting the soyence when it just so happens to verify the women's latest buggaboo(age gap relationships) in a way that, as you point out, doesn't really make sense.

@Otterly can you help clarify for us stupid moids?

The science said it was primarily the mother’s age but yeah it hurt the feelings of the women over 35 so the soyence is now saying that the age of women doesn’t matter at all and now it’s all the man. Once again the hurt feelings of women mean it is a social crisis and we have to lie to ourselves so women don’t feel bad about putting off having children so they can have more sexual partners with random men.

It’s best to have children in your 20s and early 30s. This is the age range the vast majority have been had throughout civilization and there is a reason for that. The soyence will pretend women having children at 45 is perfectly okay but a man at age 31 is some crisis. At a gut level, you know this is absolutely retarded but sparing hurt feelings of women is what matters in current year plus nine.

What's the reason given for this? I can buy that age plays a role for both men and women, but it sounds like absolute bullshit to say a woman's age has no effect.

I'm not knowledgable enough to say whether this is true or false but I can say this is typical feminist modus operandi (eg. In any given situation, everything is the male's fault. If it is in fact, the female's fault, then place blame on males anyway).

That's the odd part.

You can just say old sperm = bad, but now its specifically old sperm, young egg.

Reminds me a lot of aznidentity types that say the bleaching of yellow women spawn Supreme Gentlemen, but not the ricing of white women, apparently.

Warning: autistic analysis.

I've browsed that subreddit as well as other similar communities but there is some truth in what they say.

Generally speaking, in a White male/Asian female relationship, the male is a soy reject and the female has racial self-hatred. This is not conducive to a healthy family environment for the children who end up being Elliot Rogers (the supreme gentleman) or Mayli Wang (facial abuse).

In an Asian male/White female relationship, both sides hold each other to higher standards, instead of lower. The Asian male, whose culture contains the "Asian beauty standard" AKA young skinny girls like Eve from the Steller Blade game expects the White female to be a certain body type and weight (eg not fat). The White female as usual probably expects a certain level of income or assets. I would further argue, the White female expects a certain type of masculinity from the Asian male. Let's call it "healthy masculinity" and compare it to the other type of masculinity the While female gets from Black man (eg paying the toll).

You can run the experiments yourself. Based on your hecking valid lived experiences, what comes to mind when you think of Black Male/White Female? The BM is probably a thug type and the WF is more often than not fat. The WF also probably gets killed. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find out what the reality of AM/WF is like. I'll give you a starting point: the WF will very rarely be fat or even chubby.

Prior to the Title IX thread I never actually realized just how all consuming the femoid obsession with legally being permitted to kill children was. In the thread itself I initially thought I was just reading the ramblings of one or two fringe lunatics but after being directed to the man-hate thread there appears to be virtually no opposition to the notion that being given legal permission to kill children supersedes even the most basic self preservation instincts in femoids.

Is ( thinking about ) killing children the femoid equivalent of cooming? Coomers, in the absence of a healthy, natural sexual development need ever escalating material to satiate their gooning desires. Are femoids with an insatiable bloodlust with regards to children simply gooners, their inability to satiate natural desires twisted and corrupted towards the unnatural? Or is being singularly obsessed with killing children simply the natural state of the femoid, the promise of ever expanding carnage dangled like a carrot by certain political entities to enable their agenda to pass without too many complications?

I can't even beginning to comprehend what goes in a woman's mind when it comes to abortion or killing their babies. But I suspect it might have something to do with power. Females might not have power over men physically, but over children? That's true power over someone else's life.

Even by the left's own standards, everything is about power.
eg racism = power + privilege
eg "rape is about power"

 

[Johnny Salami]

Must have struck a nerve. Sorry for your feelings.

Sorry you're so thicc and a target from unwanted attention from high t men. But it'll keep smashing zoomer pussy until I decide to stop.

The "old man young woman age gap = bad fertility" argument is new to me. It could be because I haven't educated myself about it yet or it's not true.

because it doesn't exist. It's true that an older man does have some slight disadvantages but an older woman has more. Ideally everyone would be having kids by their mid 20s but at that time most girls during my time bought into the hype. Many have now decided to try settling down but are angry the men with some pull their age don't want them. I've honestly stopped talking to women who've given me shot for refusing to date women around my age.

I think the main demographic that approaches anything close to "minmaxing like a video game" are the higher IQ/higher income earners. Eg "honey, we're not ready to start a family yet, let's wait until I get that promotion" "let's wait until we get a house first, the apartment we're living in is too small for a family" AKA the idiocracy effect.

One of the problems I've seen is that a lot of smart but dorky people felt they had a hard time dating while young and in school and once they started making real money and their dating prospects increase they suddenly saw the girls who rejected them try and get friendly. One Asian guy I know had an Asian girl tell him she doesn't date Asians but during the covid shit she asked him if he wanted to catch up. And i know several dudes in that situation. Women are just trying to shame men into dating them now.

Prior to the Title IX thread I never actually realized just how all consuming the femoid obsession with legally being permitted to kill children was. In the thread itself I initially thought I was just reading the ramblings of one or two fringe lunatics but after being directed to the man-hate thread there appears to be virtually no opposition to the notion that being given legal permission to kill children supersedes even the most basic self preservation instincts in femoids.

Is ( thinking about ) killing children the femoid equivalent of cooming? Coomers, in the absence of a healthy, natural sexual development need ever escalating material to satiate their gooning desires. Are femoids with an insatiable bloodlust with regards to children simply gooners, their inability to satiate natural desires twisted and corrupted towards the unnatural? Or is being singularly obsessed with killing children simply the natural state of the femoid, the promise of ever expanding carnage dangled like a carrot by certain political entities to enable their agenda to pass without too many complications?

Women enjoy having power they'll never get. It's their once chance to over power someone. Remember, at agr 16 the average male can beat up over half the population. He can put in a few year of training to increase it. And a man can keep in shape well into his 50s if he's careful. Very few women can.

 

[draggs]

passive aggressive null is gayest null

 

[Chuck McGill]

I really hope Lauren answers him back. I'm pulling for you, Josh! You go get that Asian fed's sloppy seconds, big guy!

 

[Spud]

I really hope Lauren answers him back. I'm pulling for you, Josh! You go get that Asian fed's sloppy seconds, big guy!

You'd think she'd be more concerned with raising her kid rather than being on camera talking about "incels" and how jokes made by anon rw guys are what's pushing whamen to vote left.

Building on the gooner comparison

You're overthinking about this. Women like power and currently it's the men in dresses funded by jewish meme money who have power.

 

[The Punished Mitch]

I can't even beginning to comprehend what goes in a woman's mind when it comes to abortion or killing their babies. But I suspect it might have something to do with power. Females might not have power over men physically, but over children? That's true power over someone else's life.

Even by the left's own standards, everything is about power.
eg racism = power + privilege
eg "rape is about power"

Building on the gooner comparison - is it possible that femoid self destructive voting patterns are simply their natural end stage as gooners?

Gooners end up wanting to become the urinal, the cumdump, the braindead fucktoy object once they've exhausted everything else. Is the final stage of femoid gooning over the killing of children, once everything else is exhausted, a desire to become the murdered, destroyed and disposed of child? Does a desire to be terminated utterly and completely inspire femoid politics - do they seek to be dehumanized by Jaleel and effectively replaced by mentally ill men pretending to be women?

Is a brainwashed sissy eunuch standing in front of a BNWO/white genocide flag really all that different from a femoid voting in favor of letting mentall ill men replace them? Does being forced to pretend Yaniv and Gibes are just as much women as they are turn them on, sexually?

 

[Clem Fandango]

But we can't forget the "financial" element.

But "kids are expensive" is the greatest lie ever told. Kids are cheap.

Toys? Free - people give them away when their kids grow too old for them.

Clothes? Again, people literally give them away on Facebook market place, since they grow out of them every year. Family and friends will also be all to eager to offload their old baby clothes onto you.

Buggies, slings? My son rides around in a free pram from a couple who were moving to Australia and couldn't take it with them.

Food? Give them oats, rice, pasta, fruit. This is all fucking cheap. You do not need to buy them overpriced "kids food" in those foil sachets. That shit is just a big pot of pasta or casserole that they portioned out. You can make the same food yourself at home for almost nothing.

You can't ever "not afford" a kid. They're only expensive in the sense that the amount of money you can spend on them is essentially unlimited. But just... don't do that.

I get that you might want to send your kid to a fancy private school that costs a lot of money, but then you still have more than a decade from when they're born to save up. So you still may as well have the kid in your 20s or 30s and then you will naturally have a better earning potential in your 40s. I just don't think it's a good reason to wait around.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Sorry you're so thicc and a target from unwanted attention from high t men. But it'll keep smashing zoomer pussy until I decide to stop.

I see that I missed another rousing round of Biting the Hand That Feeds. I don't understand why you faggots just can't leave the dog alone. So what? He's wrong about the age gap thing. His evidence/example was Chris Chan. If you look at Lolcows, then yeah a lot of them have autistic retarded huge age gapped parents because they're also usually as insane as their offspring. Stop fucking poking the damn dog with your sperging.

I get that you might want to send your kid to a fancy private school that costs a lot of money, but then you still have more than a decade from when they're born to save up. So you still may as well have the kid in your 20s or 30s and then you will naturally have a better earning potential in your 40s. I just don't think it's a good reason to wait around.

I tell this to people all the time. Your ancestors raised your grandparents with far less than you have today. The only thing holding you back are your desire for creature comforts and your own selfishness. If you want to sit there and complain about how the Deep State wants to reduce the population via their agenda, I don't want to fucking hear it. You don't stop the World Economic Forum faggots from reducing the world population by doing exactly what they want you to do.

 

[Chuck McGill]

I see that I missed another rousing round of Biting the Hand That Feeds. I don't understand why you faggots just can't leave the dog alone. So what? He's wrong about the age gap thing. His evidence/example was Chris Chan. If you look at Lolcows, then yeah a lot of them have autistic retarded huge age gapped parents because they're also usually as insane as their offspring. Stop fucking poking the damn dog with your sperging.

He literally comes in here of his own accord to fight with people here. Nobody tagged him until he already showed up, I checked. I can almost sympathize with him not wanting to be tagged in here(even if we're the only thread on record held to that standard), but if the line is "don't even mention the possibility the owner might be wrong on something in an easily ignorable thread", that's absolute insanity.

 

[draggs]

I see that I missed another rousing round of Biting the Hand That Feeds. I don't understand why you faggots just can't leave the dog alone. So what? He's wrong about the age gap thing. His evidence/example was Chris Chan. If you look at Lolcows, then yeah a lot of them have autistic retarded huge age gapped parents because they're also usually as insane as their offspring. Stop fucking poking the damn dog with your sperging.


I tell this to people all the time. Your ancestors raised your grandparents with far less than you have today. The only thing holding you back are your desire for creature comforts and your own selfishness. If you want to sit there and complain about how the Deep State wants to reduce the population via their agenda, I don't want to fucking hear it. You don't stop the World Economic Forum faggots from reducing the world population by doing exactly what they want you to do.

derka derka do not blaspheme the neko shota prophet noolhammed (pizza be upon him) derka derka noolhammed (pizza be upon him) cheese jihad

 

[Chop Top]

Great, you lot can comfort each other then, considering how well you've all done. I think that's what this little sewing circle is for.

Why are you such a fag in this thread?

 

[Null]

Why are you such a fag in this thread?

When in Rome.