- Joined
- Aug 7, 2023
phil SHOULD sue but he's such a non toxic nice guy style gamer that he won't. But he would totally winIs this even legal knowing phill He'll sue them for money
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
phil SHOULD sue but he's such a non toxic nice guy style gamer that he won't. But he would totally winIs this even legal knowing phill He'll sue them for money
It's easier to animate, either that or they could claim it's a nod to DSP's portrayal in the old YouTube machinima series called "YouTube Avenue" created by GMod idiot box guy, DasBoSchittWhy did they make all the characters Canadian?
Probably because of the sheer amount of awesome contained within both.Why does this look exactly like the Alex Jones game?
As other anons have said they should have made the game free and this immune to any problems like that. On the other hand they know DSP will never pony up the money for a lawyer or go through the hassle of legal shit. So its just another way to rub his gouty face in how hated he is.Looks cute, but are they allowed to use his likeness while making money off it? I mean arguably his likeness is the whole selling point.
I guess Phil could sue em pro se like Greer. Probably would allege defamation even though it's obvious parody. It's basically the same deal as South Park using Saddam's Hussein as a character. He's in Washington, could drive over to Valve even. Won't happen but it would be funny.As other anons have said they should have made the game free and this immune to any problems like that. On the other hand they know DSP will never pony up the money for a lawyer or go through the hassle of legal shit. So its just another way to rub his gouty face in how hated he is.
Why, Rackets is fuckign useless, and booze has rotted his faggot brain. DSP was dead on with nick.DSP is probably reconsidering the comments he made about Rekieta right now
It is much more likely than not: Yes unauthorized use of likeness is actionable, and the fact that the devs are charging money could be used to justify monetary damages. On the other hand, Washington specifically exempts parody and satire from its unauthorized use of likeness statute:Looks cute, but are they allowed to use his likeness while making money off it? I mean arguably his likeness is the whole selling point.
Emphasis mine. Note that RCW 63.60.050 is Washington's statute on unauthorized use of likeness.Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 63.60.070 said:(1) For purposes of RCW 63.60.050, the use of a name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness in connection with matters of cultural, historical, political, religious, educational, newsworthy, or public interest, including, without limitation, comment, criticism, satire, and parody relating thereto, shall not constitute a use for which consent is required under this chapter. A matter exempt from consent under this subsection does not lose such exempt status because it appears in the form of a paid advertisement if it is clear that the principal purpose of the advertisement is to comment on such matter.
Phil is too lazy to do that and we all know it. If I'm wrong and lolsuit Christmas comes early, Washington's anti-SLAPP law would let whoever he sued file a counterclaim for dismissal and attorneys' fees. He may not have the money to pay opposing counsel..... which is about where they'd slap a lien on the Snort Fort.I guess Phil could sue em pro se like Greer. Probably would allege defamation even though it's obvious parody. It's basically the same deal as South Park using Saddam's Hussein as a character. He's in Washington, could drive over to Valve even. Won't happen but it would be funny.
.....what exactly is "defaming" about this?I guess Phil could sue em pro se like Greer. Probably would allege defamation even though it's obvious parody. It's basically the same deal as South Park using Saddam's Hussein as a character. He's in Washington, could drive over to Valve even. Won't happen but it would be funny.
Anyway this is amazing and Phil wishes his fans were this talented. I bet one of em will make a crappy RPGmaker game in response to this.
They should have done the donation route of "Game is free but help us fund more games in the future *Wink Wink*". I think that would go way better but probably be less money overall.It is much more likely than not: Yes unauthorized use of likeness is actionable, and the fact that the devs are charging money could be used to justify monetary damages. On the other hand, Washington specifically exempts parody and satire from its unauthorized use of likeness statute:
Emphasis mine. Note that RCW 63.60.050 is Washington's statute on unauthorized use of likeness.
Do I think this game is clearly parodic? Yeah absolutely. Do I think that defense is airtight enough to avoid a long, expensive trial? No and that's why I would not have done what the devs did. DSP isn't going to sue because that's money he could spend on gacha but I'm not going to take that risk.
Nothing at all. That doesn't stop Phil from filing a frivolous defamation claim and forcing the defendants to spend thousands in legal fees to get it thrown out......what exactly is "defaming" about this?