- Joined
- Oct 3, 2018
Every chance he ever gets to lean into the joke and maybe flip it into something beneficial (eg TIHYDP movement) he fails miserably. Forever stuck on mission 1 like the retarded thin-skinned faggot he is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No photos of him, none of his content, and most importantly Kyle wouldn't complain. More likely leftards have already complained the game incites real-life violence or something (and got ignored).There is also the Kyle Rittenhouse game where he goes around killing leftists.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1954750/Acquitted/
I'm no lolyer but if people continue being retards, I gotta try to assplain.If I made a game that's me shitting on nintendo by using mario as the protagonist and pull a PETA shit where I just make mario shart on tanukis and have the tanukis say "NINTENDO" on it, and slapped a 4.99$ price tag, it's no longer a parody.
I'm not really feeling sorry for the devs here, using his likeness and charging money for it was asking for trouble, game should have been free and they would have avoided this whole thing.
In 10 years, when he will be in an even shittier place, he will say he regret not embracing this as a joke, just like he did with tihydp videos. Rince and repeat cause dsp, dsp never changes.Every chance he ever gets to lean into the joke and maybe flip it into something beneficial (eg TIHYDP movement) he fails miserably. Forever stuck on mission 1 like the retarded thin-skinned faggot he is.
Not to mention the dev could easily upload an uncensor patch somewhere else for that full Pigroach experience.So if the developer just alters the game slightly by removing Phil's head and use some of the detractor art that uses a pig's head (the ultimate art would be to combine it with a nazi hat) then they would be in the clear. After all that would not be the real Phil just a parody version
So when he inevitably claims to have no idea what people are talking about as he doesn't pay attention to detractor nahnsense, that can be taken as confirmation he didn't issue the strike?
Interesting. Now I'm curious to know who the sperg is that has been leaving comments on his wall for 9+ years.That's not him. For those who don't know, this is Phil's actual Steam account:
It was more than likely one of his dents operating on his behalf. It takes Phil several hours to fix a YouTube video thumbnail, there's no way he could be bothered to actually write something up to have it handled this quickly.I'll start out by saying I don't personally believe he himself took the game down.
Agreed that this specifically is what was its own undoing. It could have been very easily avoided if it were done with artwork instead. The pricetag just did it in faster IMO.This guy made an asset flip of a game, put his face on it and is selling it at $5.00. It is objectively using his likeness, it is objectively without permission, and it is not in fair use.
The best part about being DSP is that there isn't much further down he could go, short of doing something illegal, as far as having "bad looks" goes.Phil is, and will always be a fucked bitch and a salty subhuman scum fuck, and I will always find enjoyment in his misery, but he is LEGALLY in the right to take shit like this down. It's just a really bad look for him (or his "team", and it makes him look even more like a bitch.
Alternatively you could argue that putting the character into the game is illicitly using Phil's IP without permission to make money, and since both entities are video gaming related there's potentially a legitimate argument here.Unfortunately for Phil, I’m not sure how much of a gouty foot he has to stand on here since he’s shot himself in it in the past. He’s gone on record saying that DarksydePhil is a character he portrays on camera (see: the Interview).
As such, I would imagine that this makes it a parody of a character.
I'll start out by saying I don't personally believe he himself took the game down.
But this community's biggest problem is hating dsp so much that you'd lose any feeling of fairness whenever he's right on an issue.
Phil is right to DMCA takedown blatant raw restreams or uploads of his streams. No matter the mental gymnastics or analogies you want to resort to, they are not fair use and he's 100% allowed to take them down.
This guy made an asset flip of a game, put his face on it and is selling it at $5.00. It is objectively using his likeness, it is objectively without permission, and it is not in fair use.
Phil is, and will always be a fucked bitch and a salty subhuman scum fuck, and I will always find enjoyment in his misery, but he is LEGALLY in the right to take shit like this down. It's just a really bad look for him (or his "team", and it makes him look even more like a bitch.
Unlike David I don't see any issues with paying creatives. And given how long ago I first saw the trailer for this game, he clearly put in a lot of hours. I don't see why he shouldn't charge money, especially just $5 like come on bro thats pocket change.I'm not really feeling sorry for the devs here, using his likeness and charging money for it was asking for trouble, game should have been free and they would have avoided this whole thing.
This isn't about creatives being paid or the game being cheap, its about using someone's likeness without their permission to make money.Unlike David I don't see any issues with paying creatives. And given how long ago I first saw the trailer for this game, he clearly put in a lot of hours. I don't see why he shouldn't charge money, especially just $5 like come on bro thats pocket change.