Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

I don't think the online pharmacies are going away anytime soon. The cost of drugs in the US is climbing and people are getting desperate. Too much untapped profit in the wind to ignore, HOWEVER, if troonshine and testosterone become problematic for them to carry, then they will cease to offer them. Augmentin or albuterol isn't tied to grooming kids in discord into some pedos perverted sissy fetish.
 
Also they are operational as the trannies on /r/TransDIY can attest, which is a good place to keep an eye on the sites and who needs to be reported.
Yes there is a recent post of a troon that recieved his troonshine from them a couple days ago

It's full of pube hair lmfao
Link / Archive
And the images and videos of the pube infested vials
Link/ Archive
vial00.png

Was unable to upload the videos
 
I'm amazed that this all of this very reasonable rolling back of troon nonsense is happening in England of all places. Weren't they having the police go out and harass people for calling a man a man on the internet and shit? Maybe this whole backlash thing is going to happen sooner rather than later.
It’s a confluence, I think. Obviously there’s the fact that troons just keep pushing their luck, to the point where even a lot of liberal, left-wing people are getting peaked. Huge amounts of money and effort are being put into placating a tiny and unpleasable minority at the expense of the majority. People are sick of being scolded by people who do nothing. Meanwhile, troons are unwilling to take out their own trash - they won’t accept that, for instance, maybe some of these trans women in prison who commit rape may not have had pure motives for trooning out.

But there’s also a political motivation for it. The UK government is frankly dogshit. Public services are in disarray, the economy’s been tanked at least twice as a direct result of the government’s actions and the Conservative Party is tearing itself apart. The trans backlash is an easy way to regain some favour - the people who object wouldn’t have voted Conservative anyway, and the Labour Party make fools of themselves whenever the subject is brought up.
 
Today we still do lobotomies because they actually work!! We just don't do the unprecise icepick method. But lobotomies are still done in the USA today.
No we don't. No, they don't.

There are very few accepted techniques for dealing with psychological illness that involve surgery, the mainstream accepted ones are some forms of cingulotomies, capsulotomies and stereotactic amygdalotomies, (not accounting for DBS and similar techniques because they are an entirely different beast). They still remain controversial, mainly due to not being reversible unlike DBS among other factors, and they still are used as a last resort to very specific treatment resistant forms of mental disorders where the alternative is the patient being completely non-functional and an-heroing.

This is completely aside the fact of troons being deserving a lobotomy, in which case the answer would be a resounding yes.
I’ll be cynical. I don’t think it was a realisation that lobotomies did terrible harm that stopped it. We stopped doing them when we invented Chlorpromazine in the fifties and started using it and other similar drugs more widely. Why use surgery when you can chemically cosh someone into submission? Much easier.
They’re still a dribbling retard but they’re easy enough to control.
While I don't disagree it's also about the levels of, to put it in a very silly term, "take backies" you can do with it.

You can remove the pills from the tard and (mostly, depends on which generation we're talking about) have them back to how they were, you also have the advantage of adjusting dosage, delivery methods and what type of tard pill you administer to have something tailor made to the specific needs of said tard. Lobotomies are final, they aren't reversible by any degree.

To add to the cynicism however, there's also the fact that pills for life bring in more money than a single procedure, but I believe everyone in this thread is very familiar with that one, it is the "take horse piss pills for life" thread after all.
Homebrew injections... Sounds like a good way to get some sort of horrific systemic bacterial infection
IIRC and don't quote me on this, but I half remember one of these troons saying that boiling the vials was good enough, no need for "expensive" equipment like an autoclave. There were also pictures around of a vial of horse piss concentrate with a hair in it.

So yes, precisely what you said.
 
Last edited:
Wall of text in portuguese

This one is a bit different. It orders the seizure (but not the destruction) of all lots of the drugs Otokonoko produces or sells (some are specified in the header, like Viagra, various hormone supplements and HRT supplies), and prohibits the same as the previous doc (sales, distribution, production, advertisement and use), plus importing and exporting. It is specified that the action was taken because Otokonoko was selling and advertising products without registering with or notifying ANVISA, the agency responsible for this, and that the company has no authorisation to produce drugs. It also applies to any persons, natural or juridical, as well as media, who sell or advertise their products.

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
 
Last edited:
No we don't. No, they don't.

There are very few accepted techniques for dealing with psychological illness that involve surgery, the mainstream accepted ones are some forms of cingulotomies, capsulotomies and stereotactic amygdalotomies, (not accounting for DBS and similar techniques because they are an entirely different beast). They still remain controversial, mainly due to not being reversible unlike DBS among other factors, and they still are used as a last resort to very specific treatment resistant forms of mental disorders where the alternative is the patient being completely non-functional and an-heroing.

This is completely aside the fact of troons being deserving a lobotomy, in which case the answer would be a resounding yes.
"Lobotomy" is actually a fairly common treatment for the most severe forms of epilepsy. For example hemispherectomy consists of severing one half of the brain from the brainstem. It's genuinely quite effective, and more than half of the people who get it will no longer have seizures. Most are still able to walk, talk, read, etc, and it's usually a marked improvement in quality of life over what they had before. Short of that, though, there are also neurosurgical procedures (such as subpial transections) that target specific parts of the brain. I guess the argument is, where you draw the line precisely, because there is some overlap. Lobotomy is about destroying a part of the brain, and in the beginning they would target healthy tissue, while these modern procedures are more about simply severing unhealthy sections. Lobotomy was also primarily about saving money by turning violent patients into docile vegetables, while the modern version actually is about fixing problems (by poking around in the brain).
 
Let's always remember the Nazis looked at Troon surgeries and said "Yeah this shit is too sick and twisted even for us.".
To be fair, one of the doctors responsible for some early amhole surgery went on to performing other fun human experiments for the Nazis (blanking on his name rn).
Also, I would advise those people who share these misinformation tweets to read up on it, this place was not a bastion for gay and trans rights and even their hero Magnus Hirschfeld had crazy theories about homosexuality and thought it's something that can be cured.
 
It’s a confluence, I think. Obviously there’s the fact that troons just keep pushing their luck, to the point where even a lot of liberal, left-wing people are getting peaked. Huge amounts of money and effort are being put into placating a tiny and unpleasable minority at the expense of the majority. People are sick of being scolded by people who do nothing. Meanwhile, troons are unwilling to take out their own trash - they won’t accept that, for instance, maybe some of these trans women in prison who commit rape may not have had pure motives for trooning out.

But there’s also a political motivation for it. The UK government is frankly dogshit. Public services are in disarray, the economy’s been tanked at least twice as a direct result of the government’s actions and the Conservative Party is tearing itself apart. The trans backlash is an easy way to regain some favour - the people who object wouldn’t have voted Conservative anyway, and the Labour Party make fools of themselves whenever the subject is brought up.
There's also the third reason: The fastest growing demographic in the UK.

Turns out, if you want to keep Abdullah and Mohammad on your side to vote for you, you kinda need to tone down the whole "gay rights" and "trans women are women" thing.
 
"Lobotomy" is actually a fairly common treatment for the most severe forms of epilepsy. For example hemispherectomy consists of severing one half of the brain from the brainstem. It's genuinely quite effective, and more than half of the people who get it will no longer have seizures. Most are still able to walk, talk, read, etc, and it's usually a marked improvement in quality of life over what they had before. Short of that, though, there are also neurosurgical procedures (such as subpial transections) that target specific parts of the brain. I guess the argument is, where you draw the line precisely, because there is some overlap. Lobotomy is about destroying a part of the brain, and in the beginning they would target healthy tissue, while these modern procedures are more about simply severing unhealthy sections. Lobotomy was also primarily about saving money by turning violent patients into docile vegetables, while the modern version actually is about fixing problems (by poking around in the brain).
While true, it is treating an entirely different issue, lobotomy as it was used in the past was a "cure all" for mental illness; epilepsy is not a psychological illness.

As for what a lobotomy is specifically, it is also called a leucotomy, and it targets specifically the prefrontal cortex, there are many ablation procedures that target various areas of the brain for various reasons like the ones you cited, but they aren't lobotomies. Nevermind that we don't really jam icepicks into people's eye sockets anymore but rather target fronto-thalamic or fronto-cingulate fibers with stereotactic procedures instead. (note: you likely know this but I'm specifying for anyone else reading)

I would personally not call a cingulotomy or MST a lobotomy even if you are targeting the prefrontal cortex in either case, there's a fairly sizeable difference in outcome when the method and pathway you poke around with differ.
 
Electroconvulsive therapy is useful for refractory depression, especially in the days when we didn't have that many antidepressants as we do today.

I have a friend who is a psychiatrist and he administers ECT. He swears that if he was suffering from the kind of protracted, severe, life-threatening depression that they use ECT for, he wouldn't hesitate to have it himself. As with most modalities, it doesn't work for everybody, but for some people it works when nothing else will.

Pretty sure he told me all of his patients were voluntary. Many had had previous ECT treatment episodes.
 
The alternative is a single unisex washroom with cubicles for all, where women still have to cross paths with these perverts (and a shitload of men too). The renovation is costly, undoing it someday will be even costlier, and being a normal person not wanting any part of it will be aggravating.
Though I don't really care about how women take either situation because they keep voting for it.
I've been in one of these, and it was one of the most uncomfortable experiences I've ever had in a bathroom. I was just there to wash my hands, but all I could think was "I do not belong here."

Honestly, if I walk into an open public bathroom that isn't single occupancy and I don't see a urinal or trough, I will think I've walked into the wrong bathroom by accident.
 
Lovecraft probably had the tism. He reminds me of some people I know with Asperger’s.
This all combined with the fact that he was probably also autistic, or had some other kind of similar disorder only made things worse for him.
A bit more Lovecraft derail but semi-related to lobotomy discussion and Bong Ws we're seeing recently

Trying to diagnose Lovecraft or any historical figures as autistic posthumously is like the trooning out of crossdressers and gender-nonconforming people from our history. While I don't think lovecraft level of racism was normal, there were societal malaises at the time that a lot of people were feeling. He also has his own family issues and fucked up upbringing that could easily lead him into that kind of xenophobic neuroses, and then there's probably his personality too, but personality doesn't necessarily point to a 'defined' disorder. To get social context, the early 20th century writing were filled the stories of alienation, extremism and people grasping with their inability to cope with rapid societal changes. Different writers expressed these feelings differently, but they're concurring themes, you see that with Hemingway and Kafka, and you could even say that Scott F. Fitzgerald and T.S. Eliot explored these themes too but written through a more interpersonal and romantic sense.

Our current understanding of autism has only started in the 90s, it's subjective and arbitary like gender dypshoria, and it's seemingly due for a reckoning similar to troonism.

Since we're talking about the Bongland getting based, there's a curious development surrounding psychiatry there. Both the left and right wing came into a similar conclusion that psychiatry is getting too far. The right-wing PM Sunak has recently talked about "over-medicalising the everyday challenges and worries of life” (although it's all about getting people back to works) and Britain seems to be one of the only few places with a genuine, intellectual critcism of psychiatry. America's anti-psychiatry is filled with scientology kooks, fundies and hippies. While there are a number of British psychiatrists and academics going around with arguments why the modern psychiatry model is an unscientific profit machine and what could we do about it. Most of them are economically left but hate the woke and trannies. Things do get interesting there - there are conferences about why mental disorder labels are fake and gay while 'neurodiversity' grifters are malding about muh identity at these.

It's an interesting development for the least and I wonder how far might it go.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, one of the doctors responsible for some early amhole surgery went on to performing other fun human experiments for the Nazis (blanking on his name rn).
Also, I would advise those people who share these misinformation tweets to read up on it, this place was not a bastion for gay and trans rights and even their hero Magnus Hirschfeld had crazy theories about homosexuality and thought it's something that can be cured.
Erwin Gohrbandt
 
I've been in one of these, and it was one of the most uncomfortable experiences I've ever had in a bathroom. I was just there to wash my hands, but all I could think was "I do not belong here."

Honestly, if I walk into an open public bathroom that isn't single occupancy and I don't see a urinal or trough, I will think I've walked into the wrong bathroom by accident.

Pub I worked in decided to do a retarded and make the toilet block unisex. The women, predictably, felt uncomfortable and started using the disabled loo. One knuckle dragger decided to piss in a bin to protest the lack of urinals, complaining that it was all "too girly"

The one time I experienced unisex toilets before this, I headed there only to jump out of my skin seeing my mate exiting. I thought I'd got the wrong place. We're close but accidentally seeing his dick would have been awful for both sides. It was cubicles obviously but for a moment I thought this was going to be a possibility. It's just awkward all round.

Eta: I agree that it's just an easy vote grabbing nothingburger from a battered tory party. It's a nice headline and not only are they the only party that can get away with this policy from members but also maybe nab a few lefty terfs who have been demonised by their own traditional party affiliations.

It's just non residential newbuilds, doesn't really say anything about stopping pervs from identifying into the wrong toilet. But it makes a nice headline and is a play for votes after a terrible time at the local elections this week.
 
Last edited:
Back