Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I periodically try to get into Wikipedia since I love autistic squabbling, but it's always such a landmine trying to get anything done and they have zero sense of an interested audience. You simply have to roll over if anyone gets too interested in fighting you or you end up banned, even if - as in this user's case - you have a decade-long history on the site, are inarguably in the right, and are willing to leave the issue at hand alone just as long as the other guy doesn't win and smugpost.

All of the old meta-articles are slowly rotting as people realize that making notes about how lame you all are doesn't amass political capital, but they're still quite fun to read as relics of a more civilized age.

An example of meta-retardation was when a few failed academics (you can tell that they failed, of course, because they edit Wikipedia) decided that fun word association wasn't rigorous enough. Everyone who supports this is a bigger pseud than the literal retards who think that the influences box says something profound:

17147752969367735.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I went to Wikipedia to refresh my memory on when Tribes: Ascend got killed off (if you're curious, it was abandoned in 2013 when they moved all their devs over to Smite, updated again in 2015 and 2016, then abandoned for good; you can still install it, though it's been delisted from Steam so you have to have a link to the page, and good luck finding anyone to play it with). As I was typing out "tribes," imagine my shock at what popped up at the top of the list when I had only typed "tr":
1715331701997.png
I fucking hate trannies.
 
I periodically try to get into Wikipedia since I love autistic squabbling, but it's always such a landmine trying to get anything done and they have zero sense of an interested audience. You simply have to roll over if anyone gets too interested in fighting you or you end up banned, even if - as in this user's case - you have a decade-long history on the site, are inarguably in the right, and are willing to leave the issue at hand alone just as long as the other guy doesn't win and smugpost.

Holy shit, there is over 20k words in that trashfire of wannabe bureaucrat garbage, my eyes just glazed over trying to read it.

Also can they not just format the page properly instead of cramming it into that shitty wikipedia 'talk' format, god forbid they use a proper CMS to manage their autistic squabbling.
 
And then Burger King changed its logo by reverting it to the 1993 design in order to avoid any relation with the incident. It goes to show how much we live in a PC clown world full of fear and insecurity
Just look at the logo/brand changes during the Summer of Floyd. Land O' Lakes Indian, Uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima. All these either completely rebranded or altered their logos for no reason other than woke bullshit, when most of these logos were made or modeled off an actual person.
 
Just look at the logo/brand changes during the Summer of Floyd. Land O' Lakes Indian, Uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima. All these either completely rebranded or altered their logos for no reason other than woke bullshit, when most of these logos were made or modeled off an actual person.
They purged those logos of those uppity Negroes just like hero Derek Chauvin purged the world of fentanyl addict George Floyd.
 
In the article on "shamanism", it isn't long before "woke" delusion -- "cultural appropriation" BS this time -- shows up. Such BS is really getting tiresome at this point.

In the 20th century, non-Indigenous Westerners involved in countercultural movements, such as hippies and the New Age created modern magico-religious practices influenced by their ideas of various Indigenous religions, creating what has been termed neoshamanism or the neoshamanic movement.[3] It has affected the development of many neopagan practices, as well as faced a backlash and accusations of cultural appropriation,[4] exploitation and misrepresentation when outside observers have tried to practice the ceremonies of, or represent, centuries-old cultures to which they do not belong.[5]​

- Shamanism - Wikipedia

(Intangible culture itself cannot be "stolen", and it's not the end of the world if white people have a misconception of it.)
 
1715450723930.png
In a rare break from wokism, weebs have infiltrated the DYK section today.
(Uma Musume is basically a copycat of franchises like Idolm@ster, but with horse girls. I heard rumors that it took so long to develop was because of the Yakuza owning several of the horses and weren't please with the idea of their horses being turned into anime idol girls who also race....I wish it didn't happen.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know I'm preaching to the choir, but someone a few pages back pointed out that "reliable source" is decided solely based on if mods agree with it or not. And it couldn't be more true. Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Wikipedia page uses "Youtube" and "Instagram" as a source, and that's fine. I wouldn't even be mad if it was enforced evenly, but it's so blatant. It's not even so much if the source is liberal or conservative, but the mods practice a twisted sort of utilitarianism, "can I use this to smear people I don't like?" Like the wikipedos have no issue with using openly neo-Nazi sites as source, if they can use it to smear people with guilt by association. An example: Nordic Resistance Movement's newspaper says a patriotic politician took part in their demo, it's an acceptable source. Someone pointed it out a few days ago, and after much hand-wringing they removed it, but replaced it with a newspaper quoting wikipedia, so they didn't have even change the text.

Thanks for reading, now give me the hat stickers.
 
The spastic who I posted about previously in this thread - Dronebogus - was recently featured in an article (and no, not a Wikipedia article):


This is the screenshot that they featured of him:

Screenshot-2024-01-22-at-6.57.39-AM.png


As stated before, this guy's user page is an absolute gem.

>self-inserts as Wikipedia-tan and probably goons to her
>describes himself as autistic, "a mentally ill child", and "a leftist commie POS"
>uses the phrase "submissive and breedable"
>cripplingly addicted to userboxes, collects them like they're fucking Pokemon
>one of them is about that Nyanners girl who sings cutesy songs about wanting to be raped as a little girl
>three of them are about his waifus
>the other five hundred and thrembo are standard troon humor
>has a second section at the bottom for userboxes that don't even apply to him; I didn't even notice this at first
>they're also cringe-inducing troon humor

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the perfect specimen.
 
I know I'm preaching to the choir, but someone a few pages back pointed out that "reliable source" is decided solely based on if mods agree with it or not.
That's pretty much it. Does a group of depraved child molesters agree with this source? Well, then it's reliable. Do child molesters disagree with whatever the source says? It's unreliable and biased.
 
From the article on Coups

Self coup[edit]​

This section is an excerpt from Self-coup.[edit]
A self-coup, also called an autocoup (from Spanish autogolpe) or coup from the top, is a form of coup d'état in which a nation's head, having come to power through legal means, tries to stay in power through illegal means. The leader may dissolve or render powerless the national legislature and unlawfully assume extraordinary powers not granted under normal circumstances. Other measures may include annulling the nation's constitution, suspending civil courts, and having the head of government assume dictatorial powers.[30][31]
Between 1946 and 2022, an estimated 148 self-coup attempts took place, 110 in autocracies and 38 in democracies.[32]

What's citation 32? Take a guess.
Nakamura, David (5 January 2021). "With brazen assault on election, Trump prompts critics to warn of a coup". The Washington Post. Retrieved 5 January 2021.

Jan 6 sperging pre Jan 6. Def not a Fed planned event at all.
 
Back