- Joined
- Aug 4, 2022
This nigger has no idea what he's doing. They'll just keep calling him a faggot. He looks weird and his voice is autistic.
Can't wait!
Can't wait!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is he trying to destroy what remains of his reputation?In A.D. 2024 war was beginning.View attachment 5986768
I wonder how much he could bench.I challenge you, WhatIfAltHist, to a gentlemanly bout of fisticuffs.
One round, 5 minutes, anything goes, in a pit, if you back out you're a fag and a coward.
In other words, lmao. lol, even. What a sped hahaha.
He's destroying something, that's for sure. He's lost his mind if he thinks it'll last a hour LMAOIs he trying to destroy what remains of his reputation?
War on the Internet?In A.D. 2024 war was beginning.
But yeah he's smug as hell, if he goes down the rabbit-hole of doing debates this will be really funny.
He's a smug sperg who thinks he's a lot smarter than he actually is. He was homeschooled and it really fucking shows. He's clearly well-read, but he's also clearly letting his own biases affect what he reads and how he interprets it. And reading lots of books doesn't necessarily make you smart, it just means you read a lot of books. He performs poorly in debates because he doesn't have the academic background to learn how to debate with someone. He's making the classic young, smug intellectual mistakes of gaining a massive ego and having a huge lack of real life experiences affect what he thinks, much like a young Carl Benjamin or someone like that. I was a smug, pseudo-intellectual prick when I was in my early 20s, but real life brings you back to Earth with a bump. That will happen to him sooner or later, he'll meet a challenge he can't deal with. That will either teach him humility, or it will cause him to have a public meltdown because he can't cope with the narcissistic injury. Unlike his dropping out of college, it will happen in public in front of a lot of people, and he could descend into cowdom at that point depending on how he reacts.
The debate he had with I think Vaush or Destiny (I don't remember, both fags who argue the same way) was embarrassing. He kept citing books like a nerd instead of answering a question or making his own statements. Truly an autist. Hope he grows out of it, seems like an okay kid.
With Whatifalthist's war on the Internet and challenge to debate a number of online personalities in mind, here are some posts in the thread that highlight Lynch's debating experience as a whole.Rudyard recently had a debate with two other guys on the possibility of an American Civil War. Rudyard argues that crazy right wingers and lefties on Twitter are strong enough to keep a civil war going, with limited federal government intervention.
Here's to this thread being 100 pages by the end of the year!With Whatifalthist's war on the Internet and challenge to debate a number of online personalities in mind here are some posts in the thread that highlight Lynch's debating experience as a whole.
I understand destiny, nick , vaush, and hasan, because they’re political talking heads. But isn’t sneako just some dumbfuck drooling retard?
He's like a proto-Nick Fuentes, overdosing hard on red pills and autism. That said, I don't get the unchecked narcisistic vibe from him that Fuentes has. I rather liked some of his takes, even if they are off base. He's earnest if nothing else which is refreshing in this current era of utter nihilism. But he's barking up the wrong trees in the quest for validation, which is sad.Ugh... I actually like Rudyard.... Even with how autistic he is, I really don't wanna see him turn out to be as big of a cunt sperg as the baldo lawyer...
Isn't he a nonce who unironically likes Cuties and supports people (like Fuentes, Anglin, and Zherka) who advocate for child marriages to 'fix' White birth rates?He's like a proto-Nick Fuentes, overdosing hard on red pills and autism. That said, I don't get the unchecked narcisistic vibe from him that Fuentes has. I rather liked some of his takes, even if they are off base. He's earnest if nothing else which is refreshing in this current era of utter nihilism. But he's barking up the wrong trees in the quest for validation, which is sad.
Can't speak to any of that. Just watched some of his shit in passing.Isn't he a nonce who unironically likes Cuties and supports people (like Fuentes, Anglin, and Zherka) who advocate for child marriages to 'fix' White birth rates?
He legitimately does not know. I don't think he is entirely convinced of his own positions that he spends an entire hour on in his YouTube videos. This "declaration of war on the Internet" is less about him wanting to fight the internet and more about him wanting to get a peer reviewed vibe check from other "internet luminaries". Pity the zoomer. They know not what they do. Unironically I hope @Null reaches out to him. I would much rather have the big brained zoomy zoom talk to Jersh then fucking Vaush or Destiny. There is some hope for this mega autist yet, but he literally is blinded by idealism and big brain autism. He needs a proper spanking about not being as smart as he thinks he is, especially when it comes to social and public interactions. Without that its going to blow up in his faceThis guy seems like a truth-above-all type autist and would likely get dominated in a debate.
How is he going to deal with Destiny just pivoting endlessly to change the topic? Whatever answers he has will eventually run out as Destiny finds the one topic that he doesn't know anything about and will claim victory.
How is he going to deal with Vaush just outright lying and dismissing any source as illegitimate? It's hard to cite the authority of a source when your opponent has a priori decided that your citations are worthless.
How is going to deal with Fuentes calling him a faggot? Its hard to win a debate when your opponent can at any time decide to revise the parameters of the debate and claim its all just a silly joke.
Also, what is he even debating about? Normally you would say "I am challenging X to a debate about Y", and not "I am challenging X, Y, and Z to a debate", especially when the X, Y, and Z in question don't seem to have a common connecting thread that you could use to infer a topic...