Null's hatred of Tate is 100% justified. I think people here just don't understand how fucking pozzed Tate truly is. The guy was raised by an absolutely deranged man who was a Fed who ran brothels and beat the shit out of his wife and would have regular Crowder tier outbursts. Tate himself grew into a fucking lunatic as well. He pretended to be a woman sexting men to start his camgirl sites. The little "Hey sexy, come watch my stream" pop up chat windows? Yeah that was Andrew Tate. The sext chats that a camgirl would give to users for "10 minute chat sessions $10"? Yeah that was Tate. He did that to help get his sites off the ground. The guy was sexting men for years. This was all before he started paying hookers, fucking JPs daughter and getting STDs, lying about how many Bugattis he had, and started his sex trafficking and Man-osphere bullshit. The guy is nothing but a psychotic liar and anyone who listens to him is retarded. Now he's talking about fucking trannies and fucking women makes you gay. What else does he personally have to admit to for you guys to realize he's a fucking faggot?
Yeah, he's pretty skilled at preying upon the poor village girl (that looks good) type. These girls are also looking for a mafioso daddy to take them away from their often abusive "trad" families where dad comes drunk and beats them and the sort. In his topic there should be some of his messages leaked. He'd just go into some of these young women Instas and shower them with attention, call them to parties, all the good stuff. They can meet celebrities, Bucharest nightlife can be wild, super entertaining if you have the money and connections, which Tate does. After that honeymoon period and as they settle in his mansion, away from home, it's time to send one of his women lieutenants to tell these chicks that nothing is free, and it's time to produce, i.e. become a camwhore. Or privileges are taken away and they get kicked out of the mansions.
It's a pretty savvy method, and I have a feeling it will be incredibly hard for the local authorities to prove this was not consensual. And videochat is legal, so yeah.
If what you say is true then he is a less than ideal male role model to say the least. I'm judging him from a few long form interviews I watched of his and it is from those interviews, I am about 80% agree and 20% disagree/not sure.
I've said it before, but I think a lot of null's blind spots are explainable by the fact that he's spent the past 7-8 years outside of the US hiding out in a country whose language he does not speak, and his socialization is almost entirely online. Honestly I think it's a reason why he's starting to morph into a weird man-hater. A lot of prominent male lolcows are degenerates that fuck up everything in their path. Dick Masterson, Rekeita, Ethan Ralph, anyone in IP2, etc. Female lolcows...eat too much and shit themselves on a livestream. Most of their destruction is focused inward, or on their families if they have them.
Interesting perspective, I never thought about it like that. To compound matters, it is his job to run a website chroniclng the worst mankind has to offer, and to keep up to date on the worst mankind has to offer so that he has material for his other job, running a podcast. It's like those clickbait YouTube shorts that does street interviews and only cherry picks the retards with retarded answers when 90%+ probably had reasonable takes. Think about the recent man vs bear thing. Is it possible that the women who said "bear" was only 1% of the respondents?
Young men don't get burnt out on women by clicking onto Andrew Tate one day, they get burnt out when they slowly but surely start to realize every single thing they were taught about women(specifically attracting a woman) was a big fat lie. If the system had advice for young men more substantive than "WASH YO ASS" or "Have you tried putting yourself out there bro?", figures like Andrew Tate could have never risen to power. But Andrew Tate make women mad, so Andrew Tate bad.
Hard agree, the majority of men who have negative views of women isn't because Tate told them to hate women. It was because they were fed a blue-pilled view of women/society and through experience, they learnt that everything the system told them in order to attract the opposite sex was wrong (just be nice, just take a shower, just put yourself out there what's the worst that could happen, looks aren't important, just be yourself).
In their search for explanations for their failure in the dating market, they reject the "approved sources" and stumble upon the red pill, the manosphere, or the Incel community. Andrew Tate is only one of the many sources of alternative non-mainstream information.
Tatertot is a bad man just not for the reason hole-bearers proclaim, he's a swarthy moorish motherfucker being scummy and exploitative but his yass kang slaaay act is just the marketing for his coomer business not his raison d'etere.
If Tate's past actions is as bad as people think they are, I can see why he should be opposed on those grounds and I might oppose him too. But to be very clear, my grounds for opposing him are not the same as the feminist's reasons. Feminists oppose him because he sheds a lot of light on the realities of the dating market and the gender dynamics and going against the mainstream narrative, not because of how Tate personally treated his past victims. That's just a front/smokescreen.
There is a paper
Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts, which someone took the data of and made the
Gender Guesser site. I'm not sure if more stuff has been done, or if a better version of the site has been made yet, as this was back in 2006.
lmao, one of the authors is Shlomo Argamon.
A lot of the things he says on MATHI feel performative or like he's mugging to the audience.
It's a podcast, you have to pander to some degree.
I stopped watching a while ago when it became 95% Andrew Tate, Pearl Davis and Bossmanjack.
I forgot about his dunks on Pearl Davis. I can see why he dunks on Tate but the Pearl ones seem a bit more forced. So he's owning a woman on behalf of feminists now? Yes, her burning coal with a homeless Black man was extremely cringe and I won't defend that. As bad as that is, your average leftist, your average Antifa, or your average feminist has done more and worse. Alyssa Mercante of Kotaku, or Froskurrin before her are shining examples. You can say Pearl is bad but Alyssa's conduct and she herself is a complete shitshow but I'm pretty sure Null spent more minutes on Pearl that Alyssa. It's like the bigotry of low expectations by leftists on Blacks (eg. Blacks can't be expected to do any better so we have to place the burden on Whites to perform) except it's by Null on feminists (eg. your average feminist can't be expected to not have a shocking and sordid past so we have to place the burden of performance on right wing/conservative/redpill-aligning women).
I think this has been mentioned in this thread before but think about it with your wallets - we live in the age of the lonely independent professional woman. These lonely independent professional women have spending money they don't know what to do with. Does it make sense to alienate all the broads in this context? Ergo the monetary incentive to be extra retarded.
I know that if I have some change in my pocket I'd rather go on a night out, be it with my homies or by my lonesome, and again speaking for myself I've never superchatted nor have I bought the enhanced reaction sticker pack™ on this webzone. Conversely, I don't think either married women or single women under 35 go out (alone) expecting to spend cash and might, on the other hand, be more willing to donate by whatever means are available if they regularly get a kick out of their favorite internet gossip streamer (he even has a suffragette version of his cartoon news hamster!!! Based!!! *insert soyface here*).
Many economic studies show that most consumer spending is done by women and most advertising is targeted at women accordingly. Null also offers a unique product: a (relatively) safe space for women to dunk on trannies. There are many female oriented forums and boards but I don't think any of them would allow the kinds of posts that Kiwi Farms allows. If we view this cynically, we could say that he has both an ideological reason (freedom of speech) and monetary reason (anti-Tranny women audience) to allow them a safe space on Kiwi Farms and to express anti-bad men takes, and both those reasons happily complement each other. The only issue is there could be unforeseen consequences to this pandering.
Niggers are the ones who came up with winners like “pussy don’t have a face” and “it’s all pink, nigga.” They’ll stick their dicks in anything.
Hence Black men with fat White women.