DSP's Tax Lawyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
You are getting Russell confused with Melinda Scott
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Hardin goes out of his way to repeatedly mention that he does not accept service by email, and I wonder if russ is trying to pull a fast one or if he's just that retarded
he's just that retarded
his repeated asking "whatcha gonna serve me, servant boi" makes me think he's badly trying to implement some fast lawyer moves he overheard about once at his job or college.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
He's setting conditions for providing his real address. That sounds like an admission the address he's provided to the court is fake.
And he admits the motivation for his fraud. He's having a passive-aggressive tantrum, like a spoiled child refusing to take his feet off a chair when told.
Russell is nothing if he's not a habitual liar.
I'll just read the free sample he will voluntarily publish, which will be the whole book. Like I did last time.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
Hardin woke up and chose violence.
BAD TOUCH, RUSS
Are those disclosures included anywhere? Or did Russ just email them to Hardin, snail mail to Florida, and Hardin (correctly) refuses to acknowledge them as being served up properly over email?
BAD TOUCH, RUSS
Are those disclosures included anywhere? Or did Russ just email them to Hardin, snail mail to Florida, and Hardin (correctly) refuses to acknowledge them as being served up properly over email?
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
I have found footage of Hardin trying to talk to Greer:
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
He is the court & system slave.
There is a process for the courts & you might have to mail.
( court cases are public documents(null is faaaar more harm then you(Greer) public documents space))
should keep the case in Utah where given preference for email filings.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
It just says parties must "exchange their disclosures", but I assume they have to be entered into the court record somehow. Surely it doesn't just sit in each side's inbox without the court knowing what's going on.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
The rules actually say that they don't have to file them with the court.
Now, with Hardin mentioning that they're totally useless the court may ask for a copy but it's not required.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
Russ has been in small claims court several times and though his track record there is miserable he understands the process - fill out a paper form, show up with an HDMI cable to provide your exhibits and then the bias judge rules unfairly. It's all cut and dry and the whole system is meant to be streamlined so that regular citizens can pop in and try to recover small dollar amounts from other people without having to hire an attorney.
This is real court and he's the aggressor here. Filing disclosures, scheduling conferences, making motions and other things? Woah! This isn't anything like small claims court!
It shows you how important it is to get an attorney to navigate this. Especially getting a beast like Hardin.
This is real court and he's the aggressor here. Filing disclosures, scheduling conferences, making motions and other things? Woah! This isn't anything like small claims court!
It shows you how important it is to get an attorney to navigate this. Especially getting a beast like Hardin.
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
Whoever is the judge must be really patient to put up with the mockery of the judicial system being done by Greer, although it's possible they have seen worse in their career
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
Looking forward to reading this one. It's going to be demented.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
Man, at least some courts require a filing of a notice that this has been complied with. Not in Clown Court, I guess…
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
It means Hardin will not tolerate Russ's bullshit. Snail Mail creates an accurate paper trail of certified mail that the court will recognize. E-mail is prone to fuckery. As Russ is displaying. Snail Mail means no "Dog ate my homework because I'm disabled" bullshit.
It seems like an admission of perjury and fraud upon the court. Oopsie!
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Read the wording.
1. Conference happens, then in 14 days
2. Disclosures happen.
What if 1 never happened? The most fundamental thing for laying out the case?
The disclosures do just get sent by email to counsel. It's not a filing. Russell isn't actually supposed to file those.
The conference shit is basically just instructions for how the opposing parties are to meet and agree on certain times for proceeding with the litigation. That hasn't happened because plaintiff is a retard.
DHugo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2022
Wasn't it something ridiculous, like the Radioshack had 1, 2 and 6 inches long hdmi cables, and 6 inches wasn't long enough (judge said he needed 12)
And after he lost he went on to drink "2% whole milk".
Not making it up, if I could find a copy of the book I'd show it (the lawsuit link doesn't work
)
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Fuck, man. How far away from the starting line of litigation are we, really? (And I mean we, as users of Kiwi Farms, a website.) Two district courts in two different circuits, a successful appeal, a (denied, but conferenced) petition for cert. All this for nothing about the actual merits of the case.
"Hello yes, you're talking to Kiwi Farms, the Website. Not Kiwi Farms, the Domain Name or Kiwi Farms, the Server Rack."
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
In a normal case? About 2 weeks I'd say.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
About an inch or so