Come point and laugh at user @lautaro for being a disgusting pedophile

[Bland Crumbs]

How is this even an argument? What do you mean, out of character? Isn’t this exactly his character?

Just mulch him as soon as possible please.

Pedo has a really bad lawyer. Good for him!

 

[Well Intentioned]

Why? Because the state says so, because they hadn't gone an arbitrary number of laps around the Sun?

Also, you're wrong. Minors CAN legally consent, the age of consent is 16. What part of "the AGE OF CONSENT" you don't understand? It's not the age of adulthood (1, it's the age of CONSENT (to sex). Are you stupid?

Age of consent is thrown out the window in statutory cases, you absolute mongoloid.

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.096

(1) A person is guilty of sexual misconduct with a minor in the second degree when: (a) The person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with another person who is at least sixteen years old but less than eighteen years old, if the perpetrator is at least sixty months older than the victim, is in a significant relationship to the victim, and abuses a supervisory position within that relationship in order to engage in or cause another person under the age of eighteen to engage in sexual contact with the victim; (b) the person is a school employee who has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with an enrolled student of the school who is at least sixteen years old and not more than twenty-one years old, if the employee is at least sixty months older than the student; or (c) the person is a foster parent who has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with his or her foster child who is at least sixteen.

These laws exist to protect vulnerable members of society from desperate losers like yourself.

 

[lautaro]

You can't prevent someone from replying to your post you literal retard. Then again I wouldn't expect a newfag who does nothing but pedoshields for female pedophile rapists because of his obvious "adult woman fucking teenage boys" fetish to know about the most well known software bug inherent in this forum's software. Too busy jacking your cock to thoughts of women fucking boys afterall.

P.S. kill yourself

Reading about KiwiFarms bugs isn't my fetish, I don't share, sorry. Having sex with women is the 'fetish' of 100% of heterosexual men. You may be gay if isn't yours.

If I was a literal retard, I would claim that 15 years old can't understand what they do. Imagine being already 15 and being so retarded you don't understand your ac... Oh, I finally get it. It's a self-projection all along.

Age of consent is thrown out the window in statutory cases, you absolute mongoloid.

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.096

I already knew. And I wasn't talking about those cases, niggerboogerballs. I was talking about the general case, random 16 and random +18.

These laws exist to protect vulnerable members of society from desperate losers like yourself.

And why are they "vulnerable"? According to what? And protection of what? Of having sex and enjoying it? Oh, thank you for protecting me of those evil titties! The friction could have damaged my foreskin. Thank you so much state for nannying us <3 We aren't capable of making our own decissions, we need you to tell you what to do, we're little kids.

Funny that that "protection" doesn't apply anymore when you're 18 and you can fuck your teacher anyway.

Men aren't vulnerable. Maybe you have some cognitive delay, but any normal 15 years old man understand what sex and can decide to do it if they want. We don't need to be protected like kids or women are. That nannying is hurting for men. Men are naturally risk-takers, and want to be treated like actual adultss and not perpetual children like women seem to be. If I'm vulnerable and want to fuck someone, I should be able to, it's my decission and I bear the consequences. That's what being an adult is. The state can suck my balls if they stop me from acting on my own interest and happiness.

 

[FuckedOffToff]

Reading about KiwiFarms bugs isn't my fetish, I don't share, sorry. Having sex with women is the 'fetish' of 100% of heterosexual men. You may be gay if isn't yours.

If I was a literal retard, I would claim that 15 years old can't understand what they do. Imagine being already 15 and being so retarded you don't understand your ac... Oh, I finally get it. It's a self-projection all along.

The woodchipper thing isn't a joke. People would put pedophiles into woodchippers if they could get away with it.
As the inevitable breakdown in law and order progresses, I'd be less flagrant about your proclivities, as vigilantes will just lynch pedos instead, as it's less labour intensive and a better community bonding activity.
At one point, everyone's going to realise what a lot of criminals already know, for increasingly worse crimes:
The police ain't coming.

 

[CaptainAutism69]

Eeer can we like, ban the pedo apologist in this thread? He's really doth protesting too hard.

 

[lautaro]

The woodchipper thing isn't a joke. People would put pedophiles into woodchippers if they could get away with it.
As the inevitable breakdown in law and order progresses, I'd be less flagrant about your proclivities, as vigilantes will just lynch pedos instead, as it's less labour intensive and a better community bonding activity.
At one point, everyone's going to realise what a lot of criminals already know, for increasingly worse crimes:
The police ain't coming.

I know how mob mentality works. They'd probably murder a lot of innocent people and let the actual child rapists free. Actual pedophiles who request help and would never harm a child (the majority) have a hard time getting it because people just choose to hate them for something they can't even control, even when they themselves think it's a problem and desire help. They care more about fullfulling an emotional need than actually helping those children they supposedly care.


I don't have any proclivity. In no comment did I imply that I feel sexual attraction to pre-pubescent people. Mentally retarded and emotionally immature people call people names and put them labels because it's easier to deal with them than actual discussion of ideas. Once they do it's impossible to make them reason anymore.

 

[LurkTrawl]

You call a consensual relationship "rape" because someone put in your mind the idea that a 15 years old can't consent, like they were machines without a conscious experience, lmao.
Rape means forcing someone. Consensual sex isn't rape. No one wants to be raped. They'd want to have had consensual sex at that age.

Do you also think fifteen year-olds should be allowed to rent a car?
Purchase and own a firearm?
Prostitute themselves either in-person or online via pornography?
Get tattoos?
Buy alcohol?
Join the military?
Vote?

You're either a pedo or too retarded, in a very specific way, for your existence to be tolerated in a civilized society outside of incarceration or summary execution.

 

[jershs compensation beard]

uncapable

Incapable you fucking retard.

 

[Well Intentioned]

Spoiler: Dumb, long sperging. Cut to spare people.

I already knew. And I wasn't talking about those cases, niggerboogerballs. I was talking about the general case, random 16 and random +18.

It's a thread talking about a teacher and you yourself talked about '30 something teachers fucking students' or whatever it was. It's doubtful you know little beyond the right YouTube channels to visit to get Malaysian kiddie porn.

And why are they "vulnerable"? According to what?

A lack of maturity and life experience. Yeah, kids are growing up faster, but think of how emotional and stupid we all were at that age. "YOU CAN'T STOP OUR LOVE", and other emotional shit from kids who think that some rinkydink relationship is going to be forever and ever when neither are probably equipped to deal with it.

Adults, who are a little older and savvier, can prey on that inexperience, grooming them.

And protection of what? Of having sex and enjoying it? Oh, thank you for protecting me of those evil titties! The friction could have damaged my foreskin. Thank you so much state for nannying us <3 We aren't capable of making our own decissions, we need you to tell you what to do, we're little kids.

Look, I don't give a shit about teenagers bumping uglies with each other. Most of us got up to something when we were that age.

I am going to wonder why the fuck people in their 30s (or whatever) are fixated on youngsters and are either compelled to go after them or are unable to maintain a relationship with people their own age. Same thing with people who huff and puff over the finer details of what is 'real' pedophilia and what isn't.

Funny that that "protection" doesn't apply anymore when you're 18 and you can fuck your teacher anyway.

Yeah, you sure know the laws, lol.

Yeah, it's arbitrary, but the only people who really care about this shit are morons like you, because healthy human beings aren't trying to fuck 15 year olds or have desperate fantasies that their Phys Ed teacher wants to fuck them because no one their age wants to deal with them.

Men aren't vulnerable. Maybe you have some cognitive delay, but any normal 15 years old man understand what sex and can decide to do it if they want. We don't need to be protected like kids or women are.

The law applies equally, to everyone (as they're written, in practise...) I assume you'd be singing a different tune if it was a male on male situation.

That nannying is hurting for men. Men are naturally risk-takers, and want to be treated like actual adultss and not perpetual children like women seem to be. If I'm vulnerable and want to fuck someone, I should be able to, it's my decission and I bear the consequences. That's what being an adult is.

I don't disagree that there are people out there who are probably equipped to handle fucking a 30 year old or whatever. It's not really material to the fact that there are laws barring those sorts of interactions. You can dislike them all you want. What's more concerning is why people in their 30s are pursuing relationships with people who are half their age or younger.

If you don't like the fact that society in general considers adults chasing after kids to be taboo, consider trooning out so people at least have some advance warning and you can blather this shit to a sympathetic community.

The state can suck my balls if they stop me from acting on my own interest and happiness.

Can a defense attorney use this as justification after the father of a 15 year old murders you for being a hopeless degenerate? (Rhetorical question.)

don't have any proclivity. In no comment did I imply that I feel sexual attraction to pre-pubescent people. Mentally retarded and emotionally immature people call people names and put them labels because it's easier to deal with them than actual discussion of ideas. Once they do it's impossible to make them reason anymore.

Your hair-splitting over what is/isn't pedophilia and your only other significant posts being about this same topic tipped your hand, as is this 'harrumph, I'm simply too enlightened to engage with people who don't agree that kidfucking is actually okay' approach that's taken from every 2000s Internet forum pedophile's playbook. And if that didn't...

They'd probably murder a lot of innocent people and let the actual child rapists free. Actual pedophiles who request help and would never harm a child (the majority)

This sure as hell did. I look forward to your thread. Godspeed!

 

[lautaro]

Do you also think fifteen year-olds should be allowed to rent a car?
Purchase and own a firearm?
Prostitute themselves either in-person or online via pornography?
Get tattoos?
Buy alcohol?
Join the military?
Vote?

If they know how to drive, yes.

I don't have a clear posture regarding weapons in general. Why does an IQ 80 can and a 15 years old IQ 130 can't? Who's more likely to do harm?


Prostitution is troublesome because someone who prostitutes themselves at 15 I doubt they're doing it out of their will and it's probably they're being forced to. Regarding pornography, there's two famous cases, one of a girl who faked her ID and earned a shit ton of money, wasted it and ended like any other methead. Really, was there so much of a difference? The other is a boy who sold pictures to gay men and made also a fortune, the state tried it and I think he kept it and didn't regret it. What It's clear is that punishing you from taking pictures OF YOUR OWN BODY is retardeed. It's also stupid that you can consent to sex at 16 but can't record it if you want to. UK was more coherent about it until the US pushed to make it 18 the age for porn.

Get tattoos, yes. They already do it in poor zones.

Buy alcohol, yes. They already do it. Not every country is so draconian as the US. In many a 10 yo can walk into a supermarket and buy wine or beer. If they're older they can buy anything.

Yes.

Yes. Optional vote. They already vote at 16. Vote should be restricted based on intelligence, not age. People with borderline retardation, who just vote in exchange for goods can but a smart 15 years old with very defined political ideas and undertanding of the consequences of whom he votes can't.

You're either a pedo or too retarded, in a very specific way, for your existence to be tolerated in a civilized society outside of incarceration or summary execution.

I think the same about you all. Why didn't you mature in your early teens like smart people do, and now project your lack of development into young adults, assuming they're like you? Being 15 and not being mentally an adult is a sign of low IQ.
Any 130 IQ child is basically an adult before they hit 13, Asperger brains just grow faster. I think people of low IQ should live, but have limited rights.

 

[AnotherPleb]

Incapable you fucking retard.

He's a pedophile, not a retard. Get it right.

The state can suck my balls if they stop me from acting on my own interest and happiness.

The state is the only thing stopping degenerate fucks like you from getting what you deserve.

 

[LurkTrawl]

I think the same about you all. Why didn't you mature in your early teens like smart people do, and now project your lack of development into young adults, assuming they're like you? Being 15 and not being mentally an adult is a sign of low IQ.
Any 130 IQ child is basically an adult before they hit 13, Asperger brains just grow faster. I think people of low IQ should live, but have limited rights.

Mmm-hmm.

Okay. So by your logic, everyone who doesn't agree with you on the topic is a retarded late bloomer, rather than someone who in maturing as they age look back on their time as an adolescent human with the understanding that they are much more capable mentally now, with life experience and maturation of the brain's development being complete?

Because to me you sound like either someone who is, legit, barely old enough to buy cigarettes, a developmentally stunted retard, a particularly odious pedophile who thinks he's fucking astronomically smarter than he really is, or some combination of the above.

By the way, I'm not responding to the rest of what you typed because you were enough of a fucking dipshit not to understand that what I was asking was a rhetorical question - the fact that you agreed in the affirmative to letting fifteen year-olds vote, get tattoos, join the military, and record porn/prostitute themselves would be fucking hilarious if it weren't for the fact that you're absolutely serious.

Have you actually looked up the occurrence of people with an IQ of 130 at the age of thirteen? Do you think societies should mold their treatment of children around outliers of that magnitude, and how would it not make more sense if you agree with that concept to frame it around the other end of the bell-curve in order to better protect children?

And if you read all that and typed a response, don't fucking bother because the real kicker is, even if a thirteen-year-old had the I.Q. of Albert fucking Einstein their mental faculties for processing emotion, empathy, etc wouldn't be developed enough nor would they have the life experience for context for many decisions they could possibly make still rendering them incapable of consent to many activities that are reserved for members of society with fully developed brains.

 

[FuckedOffToff]

I know how mob mentality works. They'd probably murder a lot of innocent people and let the actual child rapists free. Actual pedophiles who request help and would never harm a child (the majority) have a hard time getting it because people just choose to hate them for something they can't even control, even when they themselves think it's a problem and desire help. They care more about fullfulling an emotional need than actually helping those children they supposedly care.


I don't have any proclivity. In no comment did I imply that I feel sexual attraction to pre-pubescent people. Mentally retarded and emotionally immature people call people names and put them labels because it's easier to deal with them than actual discussion of ideas. Once they do it's impossible to make them reason anymore.

Take your Reddit pedo apologia the fuck away from here.
I was watching these astroturfed points about empathy for non-offending pedophiles start to pop up on Reddit 15 years ago.
It doesn't work. Allowing pedos to get therapy for their pedo thoughts ends up with an increasingly emboldened pedo enjoying recounting his horrific fantasies to an ever more traumatized therapist.
It makes them worse. It helps them normalise their impulses and attraction.
This was studied by the prison service in the UK, and they tried all the therapy stuff, trying to help pedos, but had to shut it down as this therapy increased the recidivism rate. (And gave therapists PTSD, particularly after any group therapy, where they just learned tips on how to offend more effectively, whilst trying to one-up each other with telling the therapist exactly how they'd rape children, and encouraging each others savagery)

We are not buying what you're selling, sir, it's obnoxious, and it's dangerous to help pedos normalise their paraphilia in any way, shape or form, whether that's with contorted language, bs about nature Vs law, places for pedos to discuss fantasy and egg each other on, even under the guise of "compassion' or in the forms of AI CP or child sex dolls.
The only treatment for these people, obsessed with minors in a sexual manner, is the forever kind. Paraphilias always progress, always get worse, usually cluster and act like an addiction on the mind, always needing an increased dose for the high.
Look at you here, with your obsession. You just can't stop, can you?
People like you have to be stopped.

 

[lautaro]

He's a pedophile, not a retard. Get it right.
The state is the only thing stopping degenerate fucks like you from getting what you deserve.
View attachment 5993516

What I deserve for what? I'm objectively a good person. Whenever I had money I helped others. I rescued many animals. I prevented more suffeirng that the one who caused, I'm pretty much a net good.

The only thing that makes me evil, according to your childish and legalist vision of morality is that... I claimed that 15 years old aren't retarded and they can choose to have sex if they want. If the age of consent was 15 this conversation may not exist, you would be totally fine with it.

Take your Reddit pedo apologia the fuck away from here.
I was watching these astroturfed points about empathy for non-offending pedophiles start to pop up on Reddit 15 years ago.
It doesn't work. Allowing pedos to get therapy for their pedo thoughts ends up with an increasingly emboldened pedo enjoying recounting his horrific fantasies to an ever more traumatized therapist.

Right, and what do we do with them who never caused harm to anyone? Don't say the woodchipa again.

So your sample is from a prision service. You don't see the obvious bias there? The overwhelming majority of pedophiles never offend, so those who were studied were the ones who are too stupid/sociopathic to actually fuck a child.
Of course that you're going to have those results. The majority of pedophiles aren't even exclusively pedophilic but show the full range to adulthood, or a more restricted to older teens, so it's not a problem that side if they can get sex with the older ones. From the 30% or so who are exclusively, the great majority of them never offend. The percentage who offend are a tiny minority of it and don't represent the majority.

"obsessed with minors in a sexual manner", minors is just a legal term which ranges from babies to 17.9999 years old adults, and doesn't mean anything concrete.
Attraction to minors of 15-17.99 years old is normal, so all heterosexual men are attracted to that age range, though only some are specially fixated on them (ephebophiles), but that's not a paraphilia and it's legal for the most. You mean children, not minors.

"Paraphilias always progress, always get worse, usually cluster and act like an addiction on the mind, always needing an increased dose for the high."
This isn't true. Pedophiles may be 3-8% of the population, yet you don't see almost 1 in 20 people fucking children not looking for CP. AGP is another common fetish, with simmilar prevalence, yet you don't see 1 in 20 men dressing as a woman in public. Those who progress into worse paraphilias are a subset who also suffer from NPD and other mental issues, but not all of them.

My obsession, lmao. I'm just responding to this because you kept calling me pedophile. It's not me the one who's obsessed.

 

[❤️ Rivet ❤️]

For boys it isn't traumatic, rather the opposite, those lucky ones are the envy of every other male. Why should it be punished if it's consensual and both parties are happy after it?

Children can't consent and it doesn't matter if the boy feels "lucky" as all kinds of research still shows negative long term consequences.

Repeat after me: children can not consent.

 

[JimiHendrix]

Any 130 IQ child is basically an adult before they hit 13, Asperger brains just grow faster. I think people of low IQ should live, but have limited rights.

i say this with all sincerity because there clearly aren't any people in your life who love you and care about you to tell you this. for the safety of any children in your area I think you should kill yourself.

you can sit here and go "oh well I wouldn't fuck a child, how could I be a danger? I'm just too smart for you."

you are claiming to hold the belief that it is okay to fuck children and you are arguing for it. I will say this in bold for you. you are a danger to children.

 

[lautaro]

Children can't consent and it doesn't matter if the boy feels "lucky" as all kinds of research still shows negative long term consequences.

Repeat after me: children can not consent.

And who's talking about children?

What study?

At what magical age do you think a person can consent and what magic does enable it to happen?

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

And who's talking about children?

What study?

At what magical age do you think a person can consent and what magic does enable it to happen?

I swear to god there not enough wood chippers on this planet for people like you

 

[DiggieSmalls]

Do pedophiles just think coming here is cool? I feel like we have "argue with pedos" threads more often than we should. The only argument that pedos should get are who gets the live rounds in a firing squad.

 

[Mr.Miyagi]

We really should just set a counter for Mass Debates that counts down the days between arguments over AoC/Lolicon/Pedophilia. I swear it gets shorter and shorter every month.