Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.8%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 81 31.0%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.5%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 84 32.2%
  • Total voters
    261
Sam Losco said:
Nick lost his appeal.
Click to expand...

Nick can't see this as a loss. He needs to appeal to the state supreme court next. Then take it up the federal courts all the way to the US Supreme Court.

It was just one bad judge. Nick needs to just keep doubling down until he inevitably wins. I mean its Nick. Nick doesn't lose.

I also think the ruling went against him because the judge thinks he is fat. He really needs to shed some more of those excess pounds.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: StraightOuttaSomalia, snoot booper, L33t Hax0r and 40 others
DumbDude43 said:
he hasn't actually lost the case, right?
this was just some legal shit about which law should be applied. the actual trial is still to come, right? losing here just means he will be tried according to the less favorable minnesota law rather than the more favorable colorado law.
Click to expand...
Correct, but since the judge in the case already said what Nick said was defamation per se, a trial doesn't look good for Nick.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: snoot booper, Active User, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 17 others
DumbDude43 said:
he hasn't actually lost the case, right?
this was just some legal shit about which law should be applied. the actual trial is still to come, right? losing here just means he will be tried according to the less favorable minnesota law rather than the more favorable colorado law.
Click to expand...
Yup! The big reason this was an L was how much money Nick has likely thrown away (to Randazza) to pursue an esoteric (and now twice losing) legal strategy. Also, the usual Rekieta L's of ego, narcissism, ODD, etc.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: snoot booper, ThisIsGonnaBeGood, Super Dilator Duel 3D and 15 others
Captain Manning said:
He ain't gonna settle. Thanks to his ego, he's firmly in the grasp of sunken cost fallacy at this point. He's already spent more for Randazza than what Monty was asking for.
Click to expand...

The only way I could see him settle is if money is starting to get tight for him. But the more likely option would be for him to switch to more cost-effective representation than Randazza.

At this point, its a rather straightforward case and Randazza doesn't add anything to it other than very high costs.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: snoot booper, ThisIsGonnaBeGood, Captain Manning and 5 others
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, Super Dilator Duel 3D, Turbo Hornbag Hervez and 6 others
Strix454 said:
The only way I could see him settle is if money is starting to get tight for him. But the more likely option would be for him to switch to more cost-effective representation than Randazza.
Click to expand...
I think this guy is such a retard that if it really came down to it, he will actually take out a loan for this before ever settling or admitting he was wrong. Put up some expensive shit as collateral if he has to. What lender would ever cooperate? Oh he'll find someone.

Anything is better than admitting he was wrong about anything. Even if it costs him everything.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: StraightOuttaSomalia, snoot booper, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 12 others
DumbDude43 said:
losing here just means he will be tried according to the less favorable minnesota law rather than the more favorable colorado law.
Click to expand...

Losing this appeal means that Nick will not be able to attempt anti-SLAPP in the case and the case will not be done according to Colorado law. I don't know that Colorado law (other than anti-SLAPP) would have done much. Using Colorado law in a Minnesota court would have made the case more complex and more expensive for everyone involved. But otherwise I don't think it matters much.

But even if he won the appeal, I think he would have lost an anti-SLAPP decision anyway. As a technical matter of law, the appeal mattered more much to Randazza's personal law nerd interests than it did to Nick's case.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Fascist Kirk, snoot booper, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 9 others
Sam Losco said:
Cross post for those that don't follow the lolsuit thread.
Nick lost his appeal.
Click to expand...
Obligatory.
dammit_nigga.png

And my congratulations to Randazza for his easily earned cash.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, koos koets, StraightOuttaSomalia and 42 others
DumbDude43 said:
he hasn't actually lost the case, right?
this was just some legal shit about which law should be applied. the actual trial is still to come, right? losing here just means he will be tried according to the less favorable minnesota law rather than the more favorable colorado law.
Click to expand...
He hasn’t lost, but his statements have already been ruled defamation per se. The appeal was trying to apply Colorado Anti-SLAPP because Montegraph was a Colorado resident.

Minnesota law is worse for Nick, who basically wanted the appeal to win and then get a summary judgement. Nick also poisoned his name in his local law community by sounding like a cunt at many occasions. Montegraph’s lawyer is someone who Nick has beef with. The judge who ruled defamation per se had a shower call elevator cornering with Nick before.

You really just need to show clips of Nick’s original defamatory remark, then him tripling down, and then how he’d never settle. Nick called a man a child molester and has since said he produces CSAM/ CP.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, snoot booper, Helvítis Túristi and 29 others
Strix454 said:
But even if he won the appeal, I think he would have lost an anti-SLAPP decision anyway. As a technical matter of law, the appeal mattered more much to Randazza's personal law nerd interests than it did to Nick's case.
Click to expand...
This.

Nick takes a big L here but, in a way Randazza doesn't take much of one because he still gets paid for trying this.

Nick basically admitted Randazza isn't working on contingency as he was flinging shit at Monty for suggesting that Schneider is.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Fascist Kirk, snoot booper, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 8 others
Sharpeteer said:
"Dammit Randazza, we lost the case again."

Ahahaha
Click to expand...
And now we venture into the undiscovered country known as "discovery," where no lolsuit has ever trod.
Strix454 said:
At this point, its a rather straightforward case and Randazza doesn't add anything to it other than very high costs.
Click to expand...
No, he needs to stick with Randazza. What does he look like to you, some poorfag pleb? He WILL drive the Rustang to court, where he WILL be represented by top notch hoity toity Vegas lawyer Marc Randazza, as is befitting his station as a trust fund brat par excellence.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Adamska, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, AStupidMonkey and 31 others
Return of the Freaker said:
Yeah, I started watching again a month or two ago. But just for Rackets, iDubbz, and ReviewTechUSA. That moment where they were streaming at the same time as Dickers and they got him to reveal the pics of his stepkids on his phone by accident was fucking gold.

Rackets felted again by the ghost of Vic Mignona
Click to expand...
Wait did Vic die??
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
  • Feels
Reactions: snoot booper, make_it_so, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 3 others
The bizarre thing is how avoidable it was.

If I hadn’t been drunk that night and formulated it as: “I think that Monte looks like a pedo!” There wouldn’t have been a case.

If he hadn’t been drunk in the following days and made a half hearted retraction about how this show is all laughs and rants and no, he doesn’t have any knowledge that Monty is a pedo, there wouldn’t have been a case.

But nope, he just had to double down and triple down, and spend 5-6 figures to call a literal who a pedophile, and avoid eating his words in any way possible.

He truly has washed the last of common sense away with whatever window washing fluid he pays 200$ a bottle for.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Adamska, AStupidMonkey, Porn Theater Usher and 27 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back