The Ragebait/Garbage Dump Megathread - Containment zone for "satire", fake news, and general low effort articles that were shat out for engagement and reactions


You might have noticed. Alt-right circles are buzzing with anti-cannibal fervor, and their toxic sludge is once again seeping onto social media. Even if you don’t follow any right-of-center accounts, the algos are dripfeeding video after video of what is purported to be Haitian cannibalism into all our timelines.

But what is cannibalism, and why is the right so eager to demonize it? If you are to believe the reactionaries, cannibalism is the act of eating another human being for some unspecified malicious reason. It’s really bad juju and definitely done under the influence of Satan, or George Soros (or both at the same time).

Quelle surprise: the imagery and notions underpinning this latest moral panic couldn’t be further from the truth. Cannibal culture is wide and varied, and has accompanied our species since the dawn of time. Cannibalism is often a deeply spiritual practice, or a desperate act undertaken in times of famine or war, or a sacred act meant to honor a revered dead (endocannibalism).

1716255165230.png

Science agrees with the need for reality-based views on cannibalism.

The Aztecs, for instance, utilized cannibalism in rituals. They believed that their sun god, Huitzilopochtli, was waging a war against darkness. Sacrifices were necessary to aid Huitzilopochtli in this war. Though it might seem gruesome to spoiled western cosmopolitans — who very well might imagine the people sacrificed to be tied up and having this act performed against their will — most evidence suggests that these people were willing participants. It was considered a great honor to aid the sun god, and those who offered themselves to the cause were treated with great reverence.

After the sacred, voluntary, ritual was completed, ritual cannibalism commenced. The Aztec nobles believed that eating someone that had offered themselves to the gods was considered to be like communing with them. It was not just normal to be eaten by a fellow human being; it was considered a great honor.

Though cannibalism has been an accepted practice for millennia, disgust for cannibalism is a relatively new phenomena. Cannibalism has been documented in European societies well into the 1800s. During the Renaissance it was thought that certain parts of the body had healing effects, and the consumption of these parts was known as medicinal cannibalism.

1716255220872.png

Science explains how cannibalism solves the food shortage problem and is environmentally friendly.

Public executions were seen as social events from the Middle Ages up until the mid-1800s, and the blood of the executed was sometimes considered to have medicinal healing powers (especially if the person executed was of notable status or had been convicted of a particularly heinous crime). People would gather at executions with cups or cloths to collect the blood directly as it flowed from the scaffold. This practice was rooted in the belief that the vitality of the executed person’s blood could cure ailments or diseases when consumed.

While this practice has declined since public executions disappeared, the use of human parts in medicine is still not uncommon. Fetal stem cells are used in numerous medical treatments. For example, umbilical cord blood (UCB) stem cells are widely used in the treatment of hematological disorders (Watt and Contreras, 2005), and fetal neural tissue has been associated with some clinical improvement in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (Lindvall and Bjorklund, 2004).

So if cannibalism, the consumption of human matter by other humans, is so widespread, why is Haiti being criticized for this?

The answer is plain to see, if you only care to look. When Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 crashed in the Andes mountains and the survivors stayed alive for several months by consuming human flesh, we immortalized them as heroes.

More recently, Haiti was called a “shithole country” by one Donald Trump — who at the same time praised countries like North Korea and Russia.

What do those people and countries have that Haiti does not?

The answer, of course, is whiteness. And there you have it.

The dark rise of anti-cannibal canards is simply the latest in a long line of attempts by the right to demonize black bodies. The people of Haiti are living their lives the way they want to. It might not be the way you would live yours; but then again, the way you live your life is certainly not the way a Haitian would want to live theirs, either.

We should not criticize cultures for being different from us. We should be praising these differences. Diversity is a core pillar of the American way, and is what built this country.

Haiti is simply the latest culture to re-normalize something that was always normal. Something that is in many ways religious, and sacred, and beautiful. Something intimate that us Americans will never experience with our primitive worldviews formed by a capitalist ruling class inundating us with anti-cannibal movie screen propaganda.

It really shouldn’t have to be said, but Hannibal Lector is not in any way representative of what most cannibals are like. Very few cannibals are murderers. Cannibalism is a sacred process to countless cultures, and it is deeply unfair — bigoted even — to judge them simply because we do not understand.

You eat pork, don’t you? People from middle eastern cultures look at you the same way you look at cannibals.

So be kind, and open your mind.
 

Attachments

  • 1716255220732.png
    1716255220732.png
    237.9 KB · Views: 1
In some senses a good idea, but there are times the initial clickbait forms an interesting discussion on the topic. Were people really complaining about this?
some are decent and get a good thread going, but so many are obvious onlyfans bait or just the shittiest takes shat out by AI. A containment thread that the jannies can sweep the threads into isn't a bad idea tbh
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustSomeDong
A&H has a new containment zone and why you should love it

Well folks, its this time of the week again: a kiwi jannie made another thread nobody asked for. This is a difficult adjustment for every farmer, so here is everything you need to know to not get banned!

So as we know Kiwi Farms is an online forum known for its controversial involvement in the "doxxing" and harassment of internet personalities and individuals, often those perceived as vulnerable or controversial. The website has been linked to various incidents of cyberbullying and has been the subject of widespread criticism and legal scrutiny. Due to its activities, it has faced hosting issues and been blocked or banned by various service providers over the years. The content and discussions on Kiwi Farms typically involve detailed tracking, mocking, and sometimes aggressive targeting of individuals, which has raised significant concerns about privacy and safety.

A&H is the Articles & News subform. A subforum is a smaller, specialized section within a larger online forum. It is designed to focus discussions on a specific topic or theme that might be too narrow for the main forum but still of interest to a segment of its community. Subforums help organize content and discussions in a way that makes it easier for users to find and participate in conversations relevant to their interests. For instance, a broad forum on technology might have subforums dedicated to different aspects such as software development, hardware, cybersecurity, and tech news. This structure helps maintain order and improve the user experience by segregating discussions into clearly defined categories!

This subforum dedicated to articles and news offers a specialized section for users designed to focus on the discussion and sharing of news articles, journalistic pieces, and various forms of media content related to current events. It is organized into multiple threads where users can post links to news articles, write summaries, and offer their insights or critiques. A&H is noted for its controversial far right views closely associated with the incel movement, which make even the controversial administrator of the kiwi farms uncomfortable.

However, many threads were dedicated to satire, fake news and general low effort articles that were procured for engagement and reactions.
Low-effort articles can significantly disturb the quality of a subforum dedicated to articles and news in several ways:
  1. Reduction in Content Quality: Low-effort articles often lack depth, thorough research, or meaningful insight, leading to superficial discussions. When such articles dominate a forum, they can diminish the overall intellectual engagement and informative value that members expect from the discussions.
  2. Misinformation Spread: Articles that are not well-researched or fact-checked may contain inaccuracies or misleading information. This can lead to misinformation spreading within the community, potentially influencing opinions or decisions based on incorrect data.
  3. Decline in User Engagement: Regular contributors who value high-quality discussions might become disenchanted with the prevalence of low-effort content. This can lead to a decrease in participation from knowledgeable members, further reducing the quality of discourse and community expertise.
  4. Frustration and Conflicts: Low-effort or sensational articles often polarize discussions, leading to conflicts and a toxic community atmosphere. This can deter constructive dialogue and discourage new users from joining or contributing to the forum.
  5. Resource Drain: Moderators may need to spend more time and resources managing the influx of low-quality posts, including deleting spammy or irrelevant content and addressing the community's concerns about declining standards.
To combat these issues, moderators and community leaders might enforce stricter posting guidelines, encourage peer reviews of shared articles, and promote a culture of high-quality, thoughtful submissions. This helps maintain the subforum as a reliable and respected resource for news and discussions. However, instead jannie created a containment thread for low-quality articles. This offers several benefits, effectively managing the flow and impact of lesser-quality content. Here are some of the pros:
  1. Improved Overall Forum Quality: By isolating low-quality articles in a specific thread, the rest of the subforum remains populated with higher-quality, well-researched content. This helps maintain the educational and informative standards of the forum, enhancing user experience.
  2. Easier Moderation: With a designated area for lower-quality articles, moderators can more efficiently oversee and manage these posts without having to sift through multiple threads. This can lead to more effective moderation and quicker response times to issues that arise within these specific discussions.
  3. Educational Opportunity: A containment thread can serve as an educational tool where members can critique and analyze what makes the content low-quality. This learning environment can help users develop critical thinking and media literacy skills, allowing them to better evaluate news sources in the future.
  4. Preservation of Engagement: By not outright banning low-quality content, the forum can cater to a broader audience. Some users might find these threads entertaining or a lighter alternative to more serious discussions, helping keep them engaged with the community.
  5. Feedback Mechanism: Containment threads can act as a feedback loop for content creators and sharers, providing insights into why certain articles are perceived as low-quality. This feedback can encourage higher standards of submission and sharing practices.
  6. Reduction in Conflict: By segregating contentious or polarizing low-effort articles, the main areas of the forum are less likely to be disrupted by debates or conflicts that arise from such content, maintaining a more harmonious discussion environment.
Overall, a containment thread for low-quality articles can help balance the need for open discussion and community involvement with the desire to maintain high standards of content and interaction within the forum.

So as you can see, with this new thread the moderators strike a balance between the need for serious discussion and free speech, overall improving the user experience on A&H.

-Written by Laura Sneed
 
Sometimes I get miffed that when almost all the Biden/Trump discussion is in that one thread which I participate in, people post a separate thread because Biden did something dumb or there is a new development in a Trump trial, and now the discussion is in two places.

But then I remember that the Trump/Biden thread moves fast and is very dense and hard to keep up with if you don't read it all day. And that could be a barrier to casuals discussing these things that don't want to read 10 pages a day of one thread. Then I'm not so mad because I get it.

Perhaps related, I don't think I have ever clicked on the "Interesting clickbait" thread.
 
Sometimes I get miffed that when almost all the Biden/Trump discussion is in that one thread which I participate in, people post a separate thread because Biden did something dumb or there is a new development in a Trump trial, and now the discussion is in two places.

But then I remember that the Trump/Biden thread moves fast and is very dense and hard to keep up with if you don't read it all day. And that could be a barrier to casuals discussing these things that don't want to read 10 pages a day of one thread. Then I'm not so mad because I get it.

Perhaps related, I don't think I have ever clicked on the "Interesting clickbait" thread.
Yeah I tried keeping up with the US politics thread, but then I'd find I spent my whole breakfast reading just that and I don't get to post any insane shitposts
A thread about a woman with a pet goose
Agreed, A&N is the best.
 
(Article) (Archive)
1716342805078.png
Singer, songwriter, producer, rapper, transphobic bigot, convicted felon, and all around toolbag Ronnie Radke and his band Falling in Reverse are back in the news again after their appearance at the 2024 Sonic Temple Art & Music Festival on Friday. The first reason is because, as Lambgoat reports, the band had to stop their set on Friday night multiple times because they managed to burn themselves with their own pyrotechnics display. Rock Feed posted a video to their Twitter account with the band members apologizing for the multiple stoppages while nursing their burns with bandages and ice packs.

If that was the entire story, it would be mildly amusing, but there were more Radke antics going on at the festival. Earlier this year, Radke had a feud going with Devin Swank of Sanguisugabogg on social media in which they seemed to indicate there would be a confrontation between them at Sonic Temple. Swank got tired of the feud and deleted all the tweets, telling Radke that he was over it, but Radke wasn’t willing to drop it and continued to insist that Swank apologize for calling him a rapist in reference to a 2015 rape allegation made against Radke.

Radke proceeded to treat the entire Sonic Temple festival like it was a schoolyard, as he continued to post a series of tweets with pictures of him at various locations at the festival inviting Swank to come fight him. Swank seems to have ignored all of them. While Radke certainly wanted to make himself look tough, he came off looking sad more than anything. He tried his hardest to piss off Swank with a bunch of jokes about Swank’s height, but the only sick burn that day came from that pyrotechnics display.
1716342839574.png

1716342854664.png

1716342864804.png

1716342876354.png
His life is like a video game.....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back