Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

[Path Wanderer]

Of all the people you would imagine to legally immolate before a creepy weirdass cunt like Monti, no one in their wildest nightmares last year would have imagined Rackets to do so.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

How much further (from his stream last night) would Nick have to go before he waived his attorney-client privilege and Randazza could be called to the stand? Would he have to quote from specific conversations?

Nick is arrogant and drunk enough to decide the state court is rigged and proceed to file a federal lawsuit against Monty. For what? Who fucking knows. But I’ve seen this scenario play out in another state case involving an egomaniac who was delusional enough to think that was a sure path to victory — as if you can just ignore it when the state judges rule that your case is bullshit and you owe the opposing party damages and legal fees.

Nick is so far gone that he probably does believe he can help himself to a do-over in federal court, no questions asked or consequences brought to bear. I sure hope so, anyway. I’m ready for this mongoloid’s miniseries to run for at least another couple of years.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick is arrogant and drunk enough to decide the state court is rigged and proceed to file a federal lawsuit against Monty. For what? Who fucking knows.

He is apparently so stupid of a faggot he doesn't even understand things like the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, that absolutely prohibits using federal courts as a pathetic attempt for state court losers (the actual term used in the doctrine) to try to use federal courts to overrule their losses.

PROTIP: IT DOES NOT WORK.

 

[World in Scarlet]

Thanks to @elb for clipping the part where he talks about his judge.

My attempt at a transcript:

And then we get to file a motion for summary judgment after discovery, because the judge Jennifer Fischer - yes like the office - decided that you needed to have discovery. The only fact, the only fact outstanding on discovery was Montegraph's alleged damages. I don't know why we need those. I don't know why Montagraph needs those, but that's the thing that was standing out. Everything else was there.

Our judge is literally fucking stupid. I'm going to say it: Jennifer Fischer, chief judge of Wilmer, Minnesota, Kandiyohi County, is touched. Not by an angel, not even by a priest, but probably by retardation.
She does not know basic facts or elements of common law. She doesn't know Minnesota statutory law. When she tries to apply the law to facts, and I know this from previous cases with her by the way, she gets it wrong.

And you know it's crazy, I know what people are going to say, those cases that I had in front of Jennifer Fischer, the chief judge of Kandiyohi County, when she applied basic common law principles on contract incorrect. She applied, because she said "I can do whatever I want," basically. She was not at that point judging in the district court, she was judging at the small claims court level. She said "No, that's not how contracts work," I'm like "Judge that's how contracts have worked for 450 years. You don't get to just change that. Like, we win."
Guess what happened: We won the next time we go to the hearing, because like any boring stereotypical woman, they will sit there and tell you why you're wrong over and over and over again, but lo and behold: If you just wait a day, they'll come around to your thing. They go "You know what, you said out. I said you were wrong but you weren't wrong, I just really love the taste of liquor being squeezed out of my vagina and then they drink it and then they do whatever." And I'm just sitting here going "Most of the judges in Kandiyohi County are men. How are they going to squeeze vagina liquor into my mouth? I don't want them to. What am I, Zach Galifianakis? Am I Barack Obama? Am I Joe Biden? No, I do not want man juice in my mouth." So I go "Can you just apply the fucking law? Can you just apply the fucking law?" When they do, they holy shit, it supports the next claim [client?].

He goes on a tangent after this.

Here's the thing: I'm not a good lawyer. I didn't win, because I came up with a novel legal argument. Literally my clients have good cases and I go "This person didn't hire that person, they hired someone else. Talk to someone else. Person A did not hire Person C. Person A hired Person B. Person B quit. Person C sues Person A. Person C is not in the company of Person B." The court's like "Well, why are you there?" Like, because these people are working in my house? It should be simple, but "Why are you there? Why are you in, why are you in town, why are you fighting this?" I don't know? Freedom matters. My rights matter. If you don't fight the government, they get to just say whatever they want.
This is the prosecutors, guys.
*drinks from metal mug*
Every bad defense attorney is two times better than the best prosecutor. You're sitting here, anybody who's sitting here going "The state is right!" Okay, die. Die.
"The state is right," you want the government controlling what you do and say, because the government would rather have people who are not literally raped by federal officers be able to say anything. When they go to say anything, they shut down their testimony. Like "Well, we want them to say everything, yes we want them to say everything, but they don't."
Chatter [?] says "You're getting bent over with diameter, all because some ego and pride, man this is crazy." All right.
*tries to drink from glass, but it's empty, he reaches for a bottle of liquor to refill it*
Tell me more about my ego and pride, brother. I don't give a shit. People always say what they want to say. It doesn't matter what you say, so say it. You want me to fight you on it? "I'm not a narcissist."
*licks bottle and grins*

Local archive:

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I need help. I remember earlier in the thread when the case had just started, people talked about Randazza having history of extorting the opposing side stating something along the lines of "we're not going to settle unless there is a new car coming my way if you get what I'm saying." Could anyone point me to this event? I am working on the reworking the OP, and I want to include Randazza's greatest hits

Thank you @World in Scarlet

 

[East_Clintwood]

I need help. I remember earlier in the thread when the case had just started, people talked about Randazza having history of extorting the opposing side stating something along the lines of "we're not going to settle unless there is a new car coming my way if you get what I'm saying." Could anyone point me to this event? I am working on the reworking the OP, and I want to include Randazza's greatest hits

I believe you're referring to my post here:

He did a whole bunch of sketchy shit, but probably the most serious, and disbarment worthy, was soliciting bribes from the people he was supposed to be suing for copyright infringement on behalf of his employer. For instance he refused to go after xvideos, despite his employer repeatedly asking, and then it turned out he had a $35k retainer and was billing them monthly. However my favorite bit that came out was from when he tried to get a bribe from TNAflix because it led to one of my favorite fucking quotes ever:
View attachment 5268047

The quote in my post came from an article that was merely quoting the original emails. Since then I've found some of the original documents, including copies of the original emails which IIRC were submitted as part of the arbitration, as well as the arbitration judgement. I may still have/be able to find more of it when I have a little time.

If you're doing stuff about Randazza's greatest hits you may also want to look into the bankruptcy he declared after he got BTFO in an effort to jew his way out of paying his former employers, IIRC he pulled a more sketchy shit there.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If you're doing stuff about Randazza's greatest hits you may also want to look into the bankruptcy he declared after he got BTFO in an effort to jew his way out of paying his former employers, IIRC he pulled a more sketchy shit there.

Nah, I was looking for him scamming his clients and opposition. Thanks to you and @World in Scarlet , I've got it

 

[Musashi's Son]

and then rape her

https://archive.ph/5NJwL (Monty's IMDB)

one of the best 1st Amendment lawyers known for extorting everyone (emails), selling out his clients for cash

https://archive.ph/tQGXA (Randazza's profile)

I will add a 360p archive of Sean's stream where he goes over the oral arguments. Also, I have attached the disciplinary action taken by the Supreme Court of Nevada when it comes to Randazza. Good job on the new OP, @Useful_Mistake

Edit:
360p archive of Sean's stream going over the oral arguments.
Wayback Machine Archive of the pdf attached in this post

 

[Napoleon III]

Remember that Nick coughed up enormous amounts of money for this L, while Schneider only had to argue that the district court was correct. I'm surprised the appeals court actually went to the fifth (tie-breaker) factor because I really didn't think it was this close a call, at least not before a couple people here made fairly convincing arguments as to its merit.

Now the question is will Nick keep Randazza around? I think he might fire him. Randazza is expensive and Nick doesn't want to spend more money on him. Especially after he failed.

The other question is whether or not Nick starts taking this case seriously. I could go either way on this one but I'll say he won't.

Wouldn’t the main reason to spend so much on a sliver of a chance being that you’re completel Fucked if you don’t win? But would that imply that discovery is going to be life ruination damaging? I seriously don’t get it.

This is an interesting thought. I can imagine some really interesting things being a part of discovery. Stuff like how much money Nick makes and what his assets are, how much he drinks. We might even maybe just maybe get proof of Nick being a Cuck.

Nevertheless discovery will be quite entertaining. If Nick was smart he would settle right now and avoid discovery.

I think what has happened is that he has an outright enemy of the judge. There are some judges that will just ignore something like this. But there are other judges who would react to being personally attacked by using every power of discretion they have in the case against someone who did something like that.

There is another dimension to this as well. Nick is a former lawyer and really knows he shouldn't be doing this. The judge will know this as well. Litigants are sometimes given a pass for stupid behavior because they have little experience with the legal system. This does not apply to Nick.

I’m guessing high five figures to low six figures. Money that would be better spent on a college fund, tools for an apprenticeship, private tutors, and other investments for your keeeeds, mang.

Could you say at least used BMW money? Maybe even new BMW money.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

https://archive.ph/5NJwL (Monty's IMDB)

https://archive.ph/tQGXA (Randazza's profile)

Added.

Good job on the new OP, @Useful_Mistake

Thank you!

 

[Fascist Kirk]

that's why you don't fuck with new world order soldier. bad shit happens

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The actual ethics shit was in his disiplinary proceedings.

https://www.nvbar.org/wp-content/uploads/Randazza.pdf

Yeah, I had found that already, and its in the OP. Still, thanks!

 

[Owlbear]

Now the question is will Nick keep Randazza around? I think he might fire him. Randazza is expensive and Nick doesn't want to spend more money on him. Especially after he failed.

Fun fact: swapping lawyers is also pretty darn expensive. Your new lawyer has to get up to speed on your case, and they may insist on a large retainer just in case you try to fire them. That is if you can even hire a lawyer who will tolerate you running your mouth about your case constantly.

 

[AnOminous]

Yeah, I had found that already, and its in the OP. Still, thanks!

I deleted that when I realized that.

As for the "used BMW" thing, I'm not convinced that crossed a disciplinary level of misconduct. It looks like settlement negotiations to me, although expressed in a nearly line-crossing way. I mean it probably crosses the line of normal human ethics, but legal ethics is a different thing entirely.

For an example of something that did cross the line, I'd suggest Avenatti's seriously fucked-up and foolhardy attempt to extort Nike.

Randazza's behavior there was more standing just barely on the other side of the line going "neener neener" and "I'm not touching you I'm not touching you." Nobody is going to praise such behavior but it's more contextual evidence that can be used to interpret other conduct at issue in the mediation than something that should have been directly penalized for its own sake.

If I had a high stakes case and the money for it, though, I'd definitely hire someone like Randazza for it. Sometimes you want a lawyer who is willing to cross some lines. I'd definitely check for preexisting conflicts of interest first (both LexisNexis and Westlaw have oppo research tools for this).

 

[Kandinsky]

He is apparently so stupid of a faggot he doesn't even understand things like the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, that absolutely prohibits using federal courts as a pathetic attempt for state court losers (the actual term used in the doctrine) to try to use federal courts to overrule their losses.

PROTIP: IT DOES NOT WORK.

Wait, what? I’ve been out of the loop. Where is federal law mentioned in Rekieta’s filings? I’m just now delving back into the Quest v. Rekieta pool since it was pending a ruling.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

or more likely that he was on the receiving end of a Rekieta "elevator talk" like the Judge for this case was

I like to think it's something even more petty, like Nick farting in an elevator.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Wait, what? I’ve been out of the loop. Where is federal law mentioned in Rekieta’s filings

There isn't. The original user was talking about a hypothetical new lawsuit in Federal court if he loses this one.

Well, actuaaaaaaaaly, Montagraph did accuse Nick of having interstate nigger lynching crime syndicate, which is a federal crime...does that count?

 

[Napoleon III]

Well, actuaaaaaaaaly, Montagraph did accuse Nick of having interstate nigger lynching crime syndicate, which is a federal crime...does that count?

I'm getting one of those feelings. Nick is at a crossroads he can either realize he is retarded and change or completely fuck himself up until he dies.

Filing a federal suit against Montagraph is the perfect way to fuck his life up. I predict he will.

 

[break these cuffs]

I'm getting one of those feelings. Nick is at a crossroads he can either realize he is retarded and change or completely fuck himself up until he dies.

Multiple online and irl former friends have said he is not interested in hearing he needs to change. He responded with derision to an EVS tweet along that vein after his pillstream and Aaron says there isn't anyone in his life who will reign him in. Aaron claims he was the killjoy of the group. Just last night on his locals' stream Nick said he wishes he was just an alcoholic because it would be so much easier to fix that than what he's dealing with.

Nick is the smartest, most charming, cleverist man in the world in his own mind. He seems like the kinda guy who is incapable of humbling himself no matter the circumstances. I look forward to this and any other lolsuits being an avenue he chooses to further humiliate himself by walking down.

 

[Rent Tin]

So how is this case going to be effected by recent arrest-related events? Might have to fire Randezza and spend that money on a defense lawyer.