Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
"Cast the Sonichu medallion into the fire! Destroy it!"

View attachment 6017656: "No"

1716571473555.png
 
So as I understand it the bond conditions are

$50k

OR

PR with Drug testing, no alcohol, report to probation, etc.

And they selected the latter.

Right?
No. Nick tried to object to that under undue burden/the 8th amendment (someone more law savvy can explain why people have been laughing at that, maybe it’s because Nick has a trust fund and has a 25+ gram coke habit) but the Judge stayed it.

Edit: they released Kayla on her own recognizance just now but I missed it, did they release Nick? I assume so because of bail but idk I’m not a lawyer
 
Nick's 8th amendment objection on the grounds of excessive bail was absolutely retarded, borderline disrespectful, and shows just how little he has learned from this whole ordeal.
Sounded like him throwing shit at the wall hoping they would reduce it.
Didn't they explicitly say "no alcohol"?
Yes, but his lawlizard former friends on stream are confused because the court phrased it like '$50k and unconditional' and 'conditional with drug testing, no alcohol and the firearm restrictions'. As a non-lawlizard I assume both are applied and its just how the judges phrase it in Nick's locality.
 
No. Nick tried to object to that under undue burden/the 8th amendment (someone more law savvy can explain why people have been laughing at that, maybe it’s because Nick has a trust fund and has a 25+ gram coke habit) but the Judge stayed it.
I liked that the judge didn't even respond to it, just set the amount instantly after he made that dumbass argument.
Yes, but his lawlizard former friends on stream are confused because the court phrased it like "$50k and unconditional" and "conditional with drug testing, no alcohol and the firearm restrictions". As a non-lawlizard I assume both are applied and its just how the judges phrase it in Nick's locality.
I'm confused by that wording too, but the "conditional" sounded like normal conditions of release. You're generally not released on bond with "it's okay if you take drugs and commit crimes" as your conditions of release.
 
People keep saying that this has chance to wake up Rekieta. But these people don't understand addiction.(also his problem isn't just addiction)
He needs a "car crash" moment. A sudden and serious event that ends with him lying still unable to do nothing for a long enough time to feel the pain he has caused himself. Having the cops knock on your door and peacefully leading you to jail isn't that.
For a lot of people it would be. I've known addicts where the first time they saw a courtroom it was enough of a wake up call. I've known others where finally getting hit for mistreating their kids was enough to rattle them loose of their addiction.
Strongly doubt it in Nick's case though. He's way too egotistical and self-assured. Having a built-in audience of sycophants to fluff his ego only compounds that problem.
 
To be fair it is a very high bail for a case like this. This is the kind of shit that you'd very often just get o.r. on. Just blindly citing the Eighth was retarded, but he could have argued ties to the community, lack of any flight risk, etc.
I don't think it's high for a second degree drug possession felony charge. I've seen 12k for a dui with child endangerment (kids in car), and a dui is way less than that level of felony.
 
Back