State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Well it's the fine or 27 years in jail when you combine all charges. Pick your poison.
i mean he's got enough to (allegedly) piss away 100,000 bucks on a more expedient exit from jail, i bet he could stand to make a million dollar donation to the state of minnesota. those somalians need his help!
 
Maranda rights
It’s “Miranda rights” fren. Thanks for making a separate thread, hard to keep track of things with how quickly it’s all moving. I did see that the pastor was outed as the mandatory reporter—sorry to be retarded/not read tens of pages of shit, but how and why was he outed since he wanted to be anonymous? Since the info is out there now regardless, might be worth adding to this OP.
 
ordered to post $50,000 bond
This isn't how I heard it.

How I heard it was that he had a personal regonicance bond (a PR bond, meaning he doesn't pay any money), and to be released on a PR bond meant he has to abide by his release conditions, like not leaving the state.

He could have paid the $50k bail in the form of a cash or bond in order to be released without conditions, meaning he would be allowed to leave the state and not check in with the probation department.

He likely chose the PR bond and then was released with bond conditions.

Edit to add: ninja'd by @davids877.
 
"wished to remain anonymous"

"His name was KEVIN MELIN, who is a pastor with the Evangelical Covenant Church in the city of New London"


Is this real life

:story:


View attachment 6018539

Evangelical Covenant Church | 208 Main St. NW | New London, MN 56273 | 320.354.2446

Then

Residence address of Nick from the "incident report":
12291 51st St NE, Spicer, MN 56288

View attachment 6018545

According to jewgle maps they are 10 min away:

View attachment 6018548

6 miles and the kids had to be driven around? (Passed a landfill lol)

They could have biked, or at least walked. Weak men like rackets the degenerate create bad times.
It appears it was their pastor that was the mandatory reporter.
 
He likely chose the PR bond and then was released with bond conditions.
He's going to find it extremely difficult to follow the no substances rule, especially alcohol and especially if he continues streaming for income. The only reason I can imagine he'd accept the conditions is if he simply does not have the money, or even a fraction of the money and has no way of coming up with it.
 
He's going to find it extremely difficult to follow the no substances rule, especially alcohol and especially if he continues streaming for income. The only reason I can imagine he'd accept the conditions is if he simply does not have the money, or even a fraction of the money and has no way of coming up with it.
Josh mentioned on the Kino Casino stream that he had a lawyer (I assume Hardin) look into Nick being a trust fund brat. He said he found no real proof of that being the case. Take it for what you will. Nick's money situation might honestly just be what's left from Depp and Rittenhouse.
 
It’s “Miranda rights” fren.
I legit don't know how I made that mistake. I made sure to double check it too. Fuck, I feel embarrassed. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed.
Thanks for making a separate thread, hard to keep track of things with how quickly it’s all moving. I did see that the pastor was outed as the mandatory reporter—sorry to be retarded/not read tens of pages of shit, but how and why was he outed since he wanted to be anonymous? Since the info is out there now regardless, might be worth adding to this OP.
Added
Here is the helpful terms of Nick's release. Note the "OR", which means if he coughed up $50k or convinced a Bail Bondsman he's a good risk then he can resume alcohol.
Not sure if we can yet find out which terms he chose.
Fixed
 

Attachments

If the laws are harder for 25g+, it's really crazy stupid to hold this much in your home.

I mean, how much of a druggie can you be? Even if you get a discount for bulk, I am sure you can go and burry most of it somewhere. You don't need this much on hand. A lawyer should really know better, because any other kind of degenerate druggie does. TMI, but I used to live in a building above a city park, and when having my coffee and cigarette in this morning, I could see the drug fiends digging up the treasures they hid during the night. (ETA mostly in bushes, and I swear at least once a week, I would see one not being able to spot where he left his shit and just crawl between weeds for 20min)

Even assuming he is a degenerate doing 3 grams a day, there is no fucking reason to have this much at home. And I am pretty sure that's on the high end consumption wise. If you know anyone who does this much drugs, you know they are not "functioning" by any mean of the word.

I can understand how intoxicating the cocktail of coke and alcool can be. They really go hand in hand, feed on each other almost. The more you take of one, the more you want the other. I am assuming that's probably why they had some other shit (not the ket) in their home. Because you also need something to calm you down in between binges.
 
Last edited:
He's not going to get locked up based on the Sentencing Guidelines, unless he has a record we don't know about. Based on his crime and non-existent record, it is presumed that he'd get a 48 month stayed sentence.

I mean he got assigned the judge he had a girl talk with in a elevator and made remarks about her intelligence and vagina. Yes, the montegraph judge. I have doubts the state will be easy on Rackets.
 
(case number 34-CR-24-341. Searching by name may not work)
Might want to add Kayla's case number as well, 34-CR-24-342 just for completeness. Also searching by name definitely won't work for the foreseeable future:
A case or hearing will not return when searching by the defendant’s name if it is a pending criminal case (i.e. no conviction has been entered as defined by Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subd. 5). The limitation applies for both the Case Search and Hearing Search when searching by defendant name.
 
I mean he got assigned the judge he had a girl talk with in a elevator and made remarks about her intelligence and vagina. Yes, the montegraph judge. I have doubts the state will be easy on Rackets.
And that is why sentencing guidelines exist. It completely removes the personal biases that any judge has, and any extreme variance would be seen as a departure, which may result in appealable issues.
 
If the laws are harder for 25g+, it's really crazy stupid to hold this much in your home.

I mean, how much of a druggie can you be? Even if you get a discount for bulk, I am sure you can go and burry most of it somewhere. You don't need this much on hand. A lawyer should really know better, because any other kind of degenerate druggie does. TMI, but I used to live in a building above a city park, and when having my coffee and cigarette in this morning, I could see the drug fiends digging up the treasures they hid during the night.

Even assuming he is a degenerate doing 3 grams a day, there is no fucking reason to have this much at home. And I am pretty sure that's on the high end consumption wise. If you know anyone who does this much drugs, you know they are not "functioning" by any mean of the word.

I can understand how intoxicating the cocktail of coke and alcool can be. They really go hand in hand, feed on each other almost. The more you take of one, the more you want the other. I am assuming that's probably why they had some other shit (not the ket) in their home. Because you also need something to calm you down in between binges.
The field test showed 26.67 grams including the packaging, without the packaging it's most likely under 25. He could probably argue that point once it's been sent to the lab and weighed again.

I'd say he was playing with fire keeping amounts even close to the threshold, but really, there's a good chance that they had even more not long ago and just happened to have snorted enough to bring them under the limit.
 
And that is why sentencing guidelines exist. It completely removes the personal biases that any judge has, and any extreme variance would be seen as a departure, which may result in appealable issues.
Yes, and it says it maxes out at 27 years and 500k if she really wants to. It might be appealable, but Rackets doesn't have that kind of cash at this point. He's dealing with Monty on one end, this case on another, a potential 2x 50k bail if both are found drinking- he is beyond overextended financially.

The judge can do whatever she wants and he can't stop it. Did you even listen to the court hearing? The man was still slurring his words 12 hours from his last drink. He. Is. Fucked.
 
The field test showed 26.67 grams including the packaging, without the packaging it's most likely under 25. He could probably argue that point once it's been sent to the lab and weighed again.

I'd say he was playing with fire keeping amounts even close to the threshold, but really, there's a good chance that they had even more not long ago and just happened to have snorted enough to bring them under the limit.
They do mention tubes and vials, which tend to weight more than baggies for sure. I don't know how they process it in the US.

However, if it was multiple vials and tubes, would it not be also attached with intent to distribute charge? Even if it does not stick, that's reasonable suspicion. I know they do this where I am. If you get caught with 25gs in a block, it's different than getting caught with 50 baggies, although the weight is the same. And they don't really care if that's the way it came up and you had no choice. It's reasonable suspicion.
 
They were released the same day, ordered to post $50,000 bond, remain law abiding, leave Minnesota without permission, not to use drugs or alcohol, submit to random testing, call in to 320-231-6222 every week, to not have guns.
We're actually not sure about the random testing thing, or at least I'm not. I actually know less after listening to four lawyers argue about it than I did before. It sounded like he was under those conditions, but the actual publicly accessible information suggested it was an either/or thing, either he put up a bond OR (Boolean operator) got out on own recognizance but WITH conditions.

The panel of lawyers couldn't seem to agree on this and I remain personally confused.
 
Back