I'm sure that every permutation of Nick from any point of time would do so too. He's deeply enjoyed using his position as the Lawtube tastemaker to mercilessly stomp on people from Montagraph to Maddox to Marzgurl, whether deserved or not. It's seemingly one of his foundational values.
The "permitting" language is also in what Nick is charged for though which is what makes it very confusing, since this would appear to apply to both of them even if their theory was that it was Nick's drugs and Kayla permitted the children to be around them. It seems odd that Kayla is charged with neglect through permitting abuse when nobody is known to be charged with abuse
Well lawofselfdefence did . He specified they failed their kids .
And honestly he’d be dumb not to see what was happening to Nick. Eric probably rightfully views things as if Nick can cut out these bad influences he’ll be fine. He seems like a man perfectly willing to bury the hatchet.
As a reward, I am once again referring to you to the Barnaby Decision.View attachment 6021326
View attachment 6021329View attachment 6021333
I AM ON A ROLL TODAY BABY!
Nick shouldn't have wished me an infinite amount of experience in Photoshop!
This is what I've been thinking too. This is anecdotal, but I know a few people whose parents were alcohol drug abusing sexual degenerates much like the rakieta's. And a pattern I noticed with them is their parents tended to include their kids in on their sexual degeneracy. Maybe it's the coom and alcohol that rots their brains and destroys their inhibitions. But whatever it is. They don't have a healthy set of boundaries with their own children. I'm willing to bet that the rakieta's have exposed their kids to sexual acts/pornography, either accidentally or (God help those kids) purposefully. Sexual degeneracy and substance abuse seems like it almost always leads you down the path of doing awful shit your kids. I dunno, my .2 cents so far.
This is why I often tell people that there's no such thing as "Trad-<x>" when we're talking about influencers or people with significant online presence. Nobody who applies that label to themselves fits it. They do not live the lifestyle described, they simply wear it as an aesthetic, like putting on a fancy hat or a nice shirt. They can take it off at any time, and it doesn't affect anything but their outward appearance.
Andrew (Legal Mindset) stated during his initial arrest stream that Nick read his thread and let it affect him more than it should and that we did not help the situation. I don't doubt that's true because Nick is a thin skinned fag who was always upset we didn't like him anymore. There are plenty of post modern thinkers these days who believe everyone has their truth, that you can't deny someone's lived experience, yadda yadda. Aaron has been using that type of language in his streams. He says he's been going to therapy and it's something I actually believe because he's been spouting that garbage.
there's only so much you can do to convince a loved one to stop being a druggy and eventually you're kinda forced into that position where you just have distance yourself, parents go through it all the time where eventually they just let the legal system take over to see if it's enough of a wake up call. i don't think that means those people are not true friends but yeah perhaps this could have been avoided if just one of them actually gave him a heaping dose of medicinal ass kicking
She, hired because she was a godly wife of a minister to do small business bookkeeping, had 50 counts of theft/theft by swindle over five years, stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, and put two companies out of business, causing 10 people who spent their time doing hard work in a small town to lose their jobs.She literally explicitly sentenced a defendant to a harsher sentence because she took a plea bargain and was represented by counsel.
Bookkeeper whose thefts ruined two New London, Minnesota, businesses to serve prison time
A plea from Melanie Daniel, 51, to avoid prison for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars, was rejected. The court sentenced her to the Commissioner of Corrections for 49 months, with a minimum of 32 2/3 months in prison.www.wctrib.com
I consider that an incredibly irresponsible statement.
She also partly based the sentence on the fact that the defendant dared to be represented by counsel.
Many people forget that understanding, forgiveness and charity is the basis of Christianity.
All the funnier considering she was a saying this a day ago about his appeal stream. What a dumb hypocrite.
How these people even muster the courage to step outside sometimes is shocking.
Drug addicts get what they deserve.
I wonder if it means that it’s nicks cocaine ? Like the idea that Nick was negligent in presenting the danger and his wife was neglectful in doing nothing about it
Always remember, these YouTube parasites were applauding us during weeb wars and singing our praises. People on the outside only like kiwi farms in as much as it can be used to their benefit. The moment it is no longer beneficial to them or says a mean word about them they turn quicker than an owl jerking its head around. Only they are allowed to say mean things online. Also evidence against them is somehow not truthful even with numerous pieces of evidence all archived and preserved because they say so.
Well when you are into that stuff as much as he is you probably by it knowing the % strength and considering he’s a lawyer I’m sure he gets good quality stuff why pay for weird stuff you don’t know what your taking right?
