Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Douglas Mortimer]

given his lawyer background, I think it's unreasonable to expect him to have morals.

100% true

 

[Kheapathic]

Would you buy a used fleshlight?

Your Honor, sidebar;

Knew a dude out in Iraq who had one. One of the things dudes would do when new rotation was coming in and you were getting ready to leave, would be to sell (at a huge discount) all the stuff you won't take back to the USA with you. Yes, someone bought a used fleshlight pocket pussy, as that's what they were called back then.

 

[Ethan Ralph Is 5'1"]

That's cool that Joe wants to support child abusing drug users, and given his lawyer background, I think it's unreasonable to expect him to have morals. That's just a bonus when you can find it.

I appreciate that he leaked Daniel Paul Harris' phone number for us, but other than that, he's just as astounding as Nick's other friends.


That's so brilliant. It is exactly what she is, and if Aaron has any brain in his head, he won't let her back in.

Would you buy a used fleshlight?

They DO sell that kinda thing in Pure Pleasure, so maybe they will take her in.

 

[Stupor Mario]

From the Metokur stream: Sailor Goon

Great song or greatest song?

 

[LemonParty]

Don't know if this has been brought up yet but it's a little icing-on-the-cake knowing that Nick and company 100% had shitty cocaine.

So you're some gay nightclub faggot from Minneapolis (let's be real, that's who Nick's connection is, this would explain the ketamine too) are you going to give the alcoholic square from out of town the good shit? Fuck no... it was cut up suburban coke. The coke was 10 - 15% at most... if it even was coke and not just meth + baby powder.

Suffer Rekietas.

 

[SandyCat]

For the workaholics and late bloomers who missed the show

https://www.youtube.com/live/DW4CbzHCZYg?si=Nd_b-Zdq7HnXGmhp

Based Xyzern always coming in clutch

Apparently Nick would, since he was buying used sex toys at Pure Pleasure?

That's a STD waiting to happen

 

[Chazzed Up]

That's a STD waiting to happen

So is fucking April, and yet here we are.

 

[SandyCat]

So is fucking April, and yet here we are.

Is nick gay enough to be into bug chasing?

 

[Sharpeteer]

Apparently Nick would, since he was buying used sex toys at Pure Pleasure?

Knew a dude out in Iraq who had one. One of the things dudes would do when new rotation was coming in and you were getting ready to leave, would be to sell (at a huge discount) all the stuff you won't take back to the USA with you. Yes, someone bought a used fleshlight pocket pussy, as that's what they were called back then.

They DO sell that kinda thing in Pure Pleasure, so maybe they will take her in.

Oh my God. I guess I should have figured, but that's so fucking disgusting. Lol

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

So the lgbt gets the wall but now there's nuance for racket's children getting physically/sexually abused?

 

[YouGuysAren'tThatSmart]

Don't know if this has been brought up yet but it's a little icing-on-the-cake knowing that Nick and company 100% had shitty cocaine.

So you're some gay nightclub faggot from Minneapolis (let's be real, that's who Nick's connection is, this would explain the ketamine too) are you going to give the alcoholic square from out of town the good shit? Fuck no... it was cut up suburban coke. The coke was 10 - 15% at most... if it even was coke and not just meth + baby powder.

Suffer Rekietas.

Thanks drug dealer

 

[CoomerTine]

Holy shit this motherfucker loves the sound of his own voice

 

[There She Glows]

Joe got the most retarded fanbase in lawtube.

I got a genuine chuckle out of this one

 

[Cad an Hell]

Found this when searching Reddit for Rekieta. This dude claims to have worked child protection investigations in Minnesota and provided a prediction for next steps. He thinks lots more info will be available only at the court house if anyone feels inclined!

 

[Trianon]

Here are some more definitions from the Minnesota code. I highlighted what seems likely in this case so far.

Subd. 15.Neglect.​

Spoiler

(a) "Neglect" means the commission or omission of any of the acts specified under clauses (1) to (, other than by accidental means:

(1) failure by a person responsible for a child's care to supply a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, health, medical, or other care required for the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so;

(2) failure to protect a child from conditions or actions that seriously endanger the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as a failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;

(3) failure to provide for necessary supervision or child care arrangements appropriate for a child after considering factors as the child's age, mental ability, physical condition, length of absence, or environment, when the child is unable to care for the child's own basic needs or safety, or the basic needs or safety of another child in their care;

(4) failure to ensure that the child is educated as defined in sections 120A.22 and 260C.163, subdivision 11, which does not include a parent's refusal to provide the parent's child with sympathomimetic medications, consistent with section 125A.091, subdivision 5;

(5) prenatal exposure to a controlled substance, as defined in section 253B.02, subdivision 2, used by the mother for a nonmedical purpose, as evidenced by withdrawal symptoms in the child at birth, results of a toxicology test performed on the mother at delivery or the child at birth, medical effects or developmental delays during the child's first year of life that medically indicate prenatal exposure to a controlled substance, or the presence of a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder;

(6) medical neglect, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 6, clause (5);

(7) chronic and severe use of alcohol or a controlled substance by a person responsible for the child's care that adversely affects the child's basic needs and safety; or

( emotional harm from a pattern of behavior that contributes to impaired emotional functioning of the child which may be demonstrated by a substantial and observable effect in the child's behavior, emotional response, or cognition that is not within the normal range for the child's age and stage of development, with due regard to the child's culture.

(b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to mean that a child is neglected solely because the child's parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the child's care in good faith selects and depends upon spiritual means or prayer for treatment or care of disease or remedial care of the child in lieu of medical care.

(c) This chapter does not impose upon persons not otherwise legally responsible for providing a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, education, or medical care a duty to provide that care.

Subd. 18.Physical abuse.​

Spoiler

(a) "Physical abuse" means any physical injury, mental injury under subdivision 13, or threatened injury under subdivision 23, inflicted by a person responsible for the child's care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child's history of injuries, or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated interventions, that have not been authorized under section 125A.0942 or 245.825.

(b) Abuse does not include reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered by a parent or legal guardian that does not result in an injury. Abuse does not include the use of reasonable force by a teacher, principal, or school employee as allowed by section 121A.582.

(c) For the purposes of this subdivision, actions that are not reasonable and moderate include, but are not limited to, any of the following:

(1) throwing, kicking, burning, biting, or cutting a child;

(2) striking a child with a closed fist;

(3) shaking a child under age three;

(4) striking or other actions that result in any nonaccidental injury to a child under 18 months of age;

(5) unreasonable interference with a child's breathing;

(6) threatening a child with a weapon, as defined in section 609.02, subdivision 6;

(7) striking a child under age one on the face or head;

( striking a child who is at least age one but under age four on the face or head, which results in an injury;

(9) purposely giving a child:

(i) poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances that were not prescribed for the child by a practitioner in order to control or punish the child; or

(ii) other substances that substantially affect the child's behavior, motor coordination, or judgment; that result in sickness or internal injury; or that subject the child to medical procedures that would be unnecessary if the child were not exposed to the substances;

(10) unreasonable physical confinement or restraint not permitted under section 609.379, including but not limited to tying, caging, or chaining; or

(11) in a school facility or school zone, an act by a person responsible for the child's care that is a violation under section 121A.58.

Subd. 20.Sexual abuse.​

Spoiler

"Sexual abuse" means the subjection of a child by a person responsible for the child's care, by a person who has a significant relationship to the child, or by a person in a current or recent position of authority, to any act that constitutes a violation of section 609.342 (criminal sexual conduct in the first degree), 609.343 (criminal sexual conduct in the second degree), 609.344 (criminal sexual conduct in the third degree), 609.345 (criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree), 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree), 609.3458 (sexual extortion), or 609.352 (solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct; communication of sexually explicit materials to children). Sexual abuse also includes any act involving a child that constitutes a violation of prostitution offenses under sections 609.321 to 609.324 or 617.246. Sexual abuse includes all reports of known or suspected child sex trafficking involving a child who is identified as a victim of sex trafficking. Sexual abuse includes child sex trafficking as defined in section 609.321, subdivisions 7a and 7b. Sexual abuse includes threatened sexual abuse, which includes the status of a parent or household member who has committed a violation that requires registration as an offender under section 243.166, subdivision 1b, paragraph (a) or (b), or required registration under section 243.166, subdivision 1b, paragraph (a) or (b).

609.352 SOLICITATION OF CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL CONDUCT; COMMUNICATION OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIALS TO CHILDREN.​

Spoiler

Communication of sexually explicit materials to children
(3) distributing any material, language, or communication, including a photographic or video image, that relates to or describes sexual conduct to a child or someone the person reasonably believes is a child.

(The next definition could go to April's responsibility as a resident, even if she was only there "intermittently.")

Subd. 21.Significant relationship.​

Spoiler

"Significant relationship" means a situation in which the alleged offender is:

(1) the child's parent, stepparent, or guardian;

(2) any of the following persons related to the child by blood, marriage, or adoption: brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, first cousin, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece, grandparent, great-grandparent, great-uncle, great-aunt; or

(3) an adult who jointly resides intermittently or regularly in the same dwelling as the child and who is not the child's spouse.

(I read this next section as, if anything rose to this level, they would have gotten "substantial child endangerment" charges, rather than "neglect/endangerment." That would mean we can rule out anything on this list as the physical/sexual abuse Kayla may have allowed. Basically that means there was no solicitation/assault/trafficking of a child, but there could have been sexually explicit material sent to a child.)

Subd. 22.Substantial child endangerment.​

Spoiler

"Substantial child endangerment" means that a person responsible for a child's care, by act or omission, commits or attempts to commit an act against a child in the person's care that constitutes any of the following:

(1) egregious harm under subdivision 5;

(2) abandonment under section 260C.301, subdivision 2;

(3) neglect under subdivision 15, paragraph (a), clause (2), that substantially endangers the child's physical or mental health, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;

(4) murder in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.185, 609.19, or 609.195;

(5) manslaughter in the first or second degree under section 609.20 or 609.205;

(6) assault in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.221, 609.222, or 609.223;

(7) sex trafficking, solicitation, inducement, or promotion of prostitution under section 609.322;

( criminal sexual conduct under sections 609.342 to 609.3451;

(9) sexual extortion under section 609.3458;

(10) solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct under section 609.352;

(11) malicious punishment or neglect or endangerment of a child under section 609.377 or 609.378;

(12) use of a minor in sexual performance under section 617.246; or

(13) parental behavior, status, or condition requiring the county attorney to file a termination of parental rights petition under section 260C.503, subdivision 2.

tl;dr

• Allowing physical abuse could indicate allowing a child to be given a controlled substance.
• Allowing sexual abuse could indicate allowing a child to be given sexually explicit material.
• You would be allowing these things if an adult who lives in your house did them (or perhaps a juvenile over 14).
• It is less likely that the physical/sexual abuse rises above these levels, as "substantial endangerment" is different than "neglect/endangerment."

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

The more the dissident right allows shit like nick rekeita & Fuentes have a voice you are giving the lgbt perfect deflections to anyone who question groomer behavior. Like how can you say keffels needs the wall when rekeita's wife is basically charged of complicity of abuse.

 

[AnOminous]

Imagine driving around in a vehicle with a "Law Pope" license plate and getting arrested as a pure white trash honky nigger.

 

[Chazzed Up]

Oh my God. I guess I should have figured, but that's so fucking disgusting. Lol

Actually I'm not 100% sure if Nick was buying them himself, but they do sell used toys there apparently. Was mentioned on Kino Casino anyway, and that's a bit too specific of a detail to make up or get wrong.

View attachment 6023009
I got a genuine chuckle out of this one

The Rekietas will end up having to pay $350k to get their kids back.

 

[theshep]

I've never in my life seen a recreational coke user with scabs and sores. I've seen functional alcoholics, functional cokeheads and somewhat functional methheads (notably with some sores).

There is far more going on here that we can speculate, but only a blood test would confirm.

 

[YouGuysAren'tThatSmart]

His pastor reported him since its their responsibility as a mandatory reporter

Aaron Imholt is a pastor now?!?