State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Useful_Mistake]

Yeah, it's an old common-law principle from In Greatbeak's Case, whereby it was determined that writs of the King's magistrates were only effective if they were at least a foot above the earth, and that a freeman could remove themselves from the King's system by throwing such a writ on the ground.

And what does that mean in actual terms?

 

[Thomas Talus]

And what does that mean in actual terms?

It means he ain't gonna be a part of your system, MAN.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Yeah, I don't know, that sounds like Nick was just being petulant. Maybe he's got a clever lawyer reason for it that I'm not aware of.

Nick telling cops to go fuck themselves is entirely in character for him, both pre- and post-booze transformation.

Maybe he refused to give the door code hoping that Kayla would see the cops outside, understand what's happening, and run to flush the drugs. Forcing them to breach the door gives her time to get upstairs and do it, since half the drugs were already in a bathroom and the rest were in the nearby closet. I doubt there was any grander legal strategy beyond stubbornness and hope.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

When the cops have a warrant, it's fucking assinine not to let them in. Literally the only thing that will happen otherwise is you give them a hard-on because they get to use a toy to smash your door, and then YOU get to pay to have your door replaced, re-framed, and re-sealed. No matter whether yoh are guilty or innocent, YOU will bear the cost of fixing that shit.

And if it is likely you will be in jail for a day or two, congratulations because now your house is unsecure for all that time.

If they don't have a warrant, obviously you tell them to fuck off. If they do have one, either be ready to defend your home with violence or let them in, because otherwise you are just going to be paying contractors, making your house shittier, and making the cops happy.

 

[Bloodfeast Island Man]

I guess I was thinking it'd be like if the cops come to raid your computer, you obviously wouldn't give them the encryption key or whatever. That was the train of thought anyways.

 

[feral cat #6385]

He's not going to get locked up based on the Sentencing Guidelines, unless he has a record we don't know about. Based on his crime and non-existent record, it is presumed that he'd get a 48 month stayed sentence.

https://mn.gov/sentencing-guidelines/guidelines/

Presume nothing! You obviously know nothing about Nick Rekieta.

 

[Sharpeteer]

I guess I was thinking it'd be like if the cops come to raid your computer, you obviously wouldn't give them the encryption key or whatever. That was the train of thought anyways.

While I agree with you 100% on that point regarding computers, that's not really what happened necessarily in Nick's case given the circumstances.

If the feds raided my house, and wanted to take all my computers and servers, I would refuse to give them the decryption keys, and tell them good luck.

In Nick's case, he KNEW his young kids were on the other side of that door, and he knew what they were going to go through if he chose to say no, which he did. This wasn't a situation where it was just him and his wife (the other criminal here), it involved innocent young kids that were needlessly brought into a police raid with a very violent entrance.

If there are young kids in my house, and the feds ask for my keys, it doesn't do anything additional to say fuck you good luck getting in.

If there are young kids in my house, and it's either I open the door, or they batter ram it down and violently enter, I would let them in.

Point being, Nick is a bad father.

 

[feral cat #6385]

She has repeatedly ruled against Nick in the Montegraph case despite having the better lawyer.

She ruled against him once on one motion that had a very low probability for success.

I guess that goes back to another point: Nick's money situation. In the hearing, he did NOT want to pay 50k bail. The Depp money is gone. He could ask for a review, sure, with what cash? There is a non zero chance he is almost broke.

And he is going to have to pay to fight CPS to get his kids.

Those bottles are more likely to be broken upside his head by Kayla than they are to stay sealed on those shelves.

Kayla is a drug zombie. She doesn't give a shit about anything other than her next hit.

Oh, he'll argue recusal, he'll argue venue, he'll argue entrapment, 4A, 2A (somehow), 1A, 8A, planted evidence, he was just holding for a friend, it was April's, Aaron put it there, he'll argue bias of every juror in the continental U.S. bc he's just so famous, he'll say he was just joking and only pretending to be retarded a druggie alcoholic, he'll argue the cops planned to have a little girl open the door, planned for him to be gone, that the jealous prudish Scandinavians conspired with the smalltown cops and that bitch judge to take him down, he'll say the pastor hates him personally, that local LE want him down bc he's such an amazing lawyer who ruined their arrests, he'll say it's montegraph, Null, farmers, lawtubers, Kayla's parents, Sonichu. It's anything but Nick Rekieta, hot air balloon, bad dad, failure, drunk.

He'll argue that since there are fringes on the flag that the court has no jurisdiction over him. He will argue GROUNDZ....

I was not aware that it was certain that someone tipped off the pastor, instead of him reporting all by his own volition and observations. I was even less aware that it came from kiwi farms.
Or is that just conjecture IF someone has tipped him off AND IF this person originates from kiwi farms?

There was some weirdo very interested in Nick's church and kids not too long ago. The poster was blasted for being so interested in Nick's kids.

This is the account which seemed overly interested in Nick's kids. They only made four posts but justified their interest as wanting to hold Nick accountable.

https://kiwifarms.st/members/tensy-speed.173471/#recent-content

It was Cynthia all along....

pastor Melin

The universe has one hell of a sense of humor

 

[Kosher Dill]

I'm hoping that we see Nick go running to Mom and Dad for the "familial wealth", to hire an army of Randazzas for this case. Clearly he's entitled to buy out the Scandinavian prudes in the court system - facing justice is for poorfags.

It'll go just as well as the Monty case, too.

 

[daffodils]

maybe April was totally unfamiliar with guns and Nick decided to let her shoot right there in the backyard.

Aaron says April likes to go hunting. She's probably more familiar with guns than Nick. But he also said she has used the deer stand on the Rekieta property, so shooting in the "backyard" is a possibility.

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

Endangerment of a child. Maximum Sentence: 364 days or $3,000 fine or both. Offense Level: Gross Misdemeanor. The wife was charged specifically with knowingly permitting physical or serial abuse of a child

Would the parent get charged with that if for example the kids fought each other?

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

So why was only Kayla charged with "knowingly permitting physical or sexual abuse of a child?" Did one of the kids tell CPS that it's Kayla who beats them when they try to ask her for food? Is she charged for letting Nick drive them around drunk? Did Aaron or another of Kayla's bulls abuse a kid as Kayla the ghoul sat back in a drugged out haze? Did Nick avoid that charge because he's practically never around his kids?

It's especially curious since Pastor Kevin seems to claim that none of the children were physically or sexually abused. Is Kayla being overcharged because the case against her isn't as solid as the case against Nick, or to otherwise get her to flip? I have so many damn questions and am still 150 pages behind in the main thread.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

For a first time offender I think rekieta will walk, but its a election year, a dissident rightwing commentator, child abuse...things not looking good.

 

[WTBOnlineFather]

but its a election year, a dissident right commentator,

I'm pretty sure this is about the last thing anyone involved gives a shit about. A district judge in Bumfuck County, Minnesota couldn't possibly care less that this drug addled retard who neglects his kids with his crackwhore wife once used to express mildly conservative views on his Internet streams or even say the dreaded N word before his show devolved into barely coherent displays of unbridled degeneracy.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

I'm pretty sure this is about the last thing anyone involved gives a shit about. A district judge in Bumfuck County, Minnesota couldn't possibly care less that this drug addled retard who neglects his kids with his crackwhore wife once used to express mildly conservative views on his Internet streams or even say the dreaded N word before his show devolved into barely coherent displays of unbridled degeneracy.

Well it is the same judge he openly Said he would drink beer out of her vagina from his defamation trial. I mean no one expected fox news picked it up. But you can guarantee most of the clips from his show will be used.

 

[Father Balldo]

I'm pretty sure this is about the last thing anyone involved gives a shit about. A district judge in Bumfuck County, Minnesota couldn't possibly care less that this drug addled retard who neglects his kids with his crackwhore wife once used to express mildly conservative views on his Internet streams or even say the dreaded N word before his show devolved into barely coherent displays of unbridled degeneracy.

The media (news reports, youtube commentators, etc.) are going after him because of his show intro exposing Democrat hypocrisy. Dark Brandon sent the cabal after Nick to destroy him. It's not what it looks like, you have to trust the plan on this one. This entire thing was orchestrated by George Soros to silence dissident voices on the right. The Democrats NEED to get massive social media experts and influencers like Nick out of the way in order to fully take out Trump and ensure Dark Brandon as leader of Our Democracy. This is just another case of corrupt governments coming down on thought-leaders that don't fit their narrative.

(This is what Locals members actually believe...)

 

[im5!XxhO]

There's something I have been wondering about, concerning your right to remain silent and the jury not being allowed to take that into account:
What happens if I talk to the police about certain things and remain silent on others. Can the jury take the partial silence into account and assume that what I refused to say was bad for me? Or would that violate the 5th amendment.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

So why was only Kayla charged with "knowingly permitting physical or sexual abuse of a child?" Did one of the kids tell CPS that it's Kayla who beats them when they try to ask her for food? Is she charged for letting Nick drive them around drunk? Did Aaron or another of Kayla's bulls abuse a kid as Kayla the ghoul sat back in a drugged out haze? Did Nick avoid that charge because he's practically never around his kids?

It's especially curious since Pastor Kevin seems to claim that none of the children were physically or sexually abused. Is Kayla being overcharged because the case against her isn't as solid as the case against Nick, or to otherwise get her to flip? I have so many damn questions and am still 150 pages behind in the main thread.

I assume they figure they can get Nick on the charges, but slapping 'you're knowingly letting your husband be a shitty person who abuses his kids' means Kayla is more likely to snitch on him in exchange for letting her off as the unwitting wife.

Or maybe it's just standard procedure to slap the charge on women because as the mother she's presumed to be the one making sure they don't starve.

I'm still curious why they didn't charge April, but I'm probably just stupid.

 

[Dr Naomi Hunter]

I'm still curious why they didn't charge April, but I'm probably just stupid

There mustn’t have been any drugs on her person and all of her government identification has a different address on it. So she can just say she was just visiting, I’ve got nothing to do with this…

 

[WTBOnlineFather]

I'm still curious why they didn't charge April, but I'm probably just stupid.

Not a lawyer but lack of evidence presumably. Rekieta went out of his way to specifically say he and his wife reside in the master bedroom (where most of the drugs were found) and that April was just visiting. The strongest piece of evidence incriminating April is her credit cards found in the bedroom, but the cops mentioned nothing suggesting they think any of the drugs belonged to her. In comparison, the drug charges against the Rekietas are a slam dunk for the prosecutor, I'd wager the only outstanding questions here are a) the child endangerment charges and b) what sentence to slap them with.
There's always also the possibility she may have caved and snitched. That'd be pretty funny given that even Rekieta seems to have tried to avoid throwing her under the bus.