Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 24.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 79 30.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 83 32.2%

  • Total voters
    258
the ONLY unforgivable sin (Mt 12:31, Lk 12:10)
Oh whoa, I'd never heard about this before today. It was always framed as "all sin can be forgiven!" Nick R. is so engrossed in his "grace" nonsense that he probably also thinks all sins are forgiven through Christ. Even as a non-Christian, that's one that I don't think I'd ever play around with in case someday I do convert. That's very heavy to take in.
 
bad idea for the Monty case, unless that one gets settled out of court, in which case it doesn't matter what he said. for this case, insulting the judge just means he has grounds to ask for a recusal, which will possibly be granted.
Wouldn't this mean that if you want a judge to recuse you don't like themselves you should just talk shit about them online? I don't know if this will be granted tbh.
 
Wouldn't this mean that if you want a judge to recuse you don't like themselves you should just talk shit about them online? I don't know if this will be granted tbh.
The judge doesn't have to recuse.

But judges tend to be risk adverse, so anything that could potentially present an appealable action, they will recuse.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
or the story where Nick captured a skunk and not having an easy answer of what to do with the animal, he simply drowned it in a pond. and aside from the animal cruelty, why would you tell that story as if it were a fun memory?
In the same video, he described beating two raccoons to death with a hammer. Or trying to beat them to death; I'm unsure how much injury he managed to inflict. Either way, he viewed it as a completely normal way to handle a couple wild animals getting into his shed.

I don't remember why Nick went about trapping the skunk. They live everywhere and are mostly harmless. I'd rather have a skunk as a neighbor than a Rekieta.


People in the thread debate if he was always like this in some way but I honestly think the man degraded after the fame and money of the Rittenhouse trail and just couldn't handle it, there were other problems before that, if I recall correctly Lady Crackits was already taking her medication cocktails but they seemed like a good normal family.
I think it was around the Rittenhouse trial that he talked on stream about using marijuana. I found that rather strange for a lawyer. Even if it was decriminalized by whatever state he was in, he was still admitting to a violation of Federal law. He probably always felt entitled to do anything he could get away with, and as he got away with more, he felt entitled to do more.
 
Once he was notified of what was going on, he had no choice either morally or legally. There is a Scriptural doctrine of unforgiveness and in fact Paul castigated the Corinthian congregation for tolerating an incestuous relationship vs. removing them from their midst. Call it disfellowship, excommunication or exile... don't care, it's the same effect.
That's not "unforgiveness", they were removed for their own good. Christ doesn't seek to destroy His followers.

deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the Day of the Lord Jesus. - 1 Corinthians 5:5

Going back and seeing the clips, and Jim's brutal yet poignant stream, where nick denounces his faith, God, the preacher and the congregation I realize there's a possibility that those dark spirits that surround Nick, led him to commit the ONLY unforgivable sin (Mt 12:31, Lk 12:10). I hope not. If he has, he IS truly lost and not just a prodigal.

The unforgivable sin is attributing the visible miracles of Jesus, as performed by Jesus during his ministry, to the Devil. None of us can even commit it today.
 
Wouldn't this mean that if you want a judge to recuse you don't like themselves you should just talk shit about them online? I don't know if this will be granted tbh.
kurt explained this yesterday. it's only because he talked shit before the new case started/happened. in that case, he can say that because of prior behavior or relationships that occurred before the case was assigned to the judge, the defendant is at risk of the judge being biased and should recuse herself. for the monty case, this doesn't work, since he said it about her in the context of that case being already ongoing.

so for that reason, i'm half expecting her to recuse herself. but, i don't think this will necessarily make things go better for him. a lot depends on the facts and on what he does from here forward.
 
Kayla is such a drug zombie I don't think she can muster the agency to leave Nick.
While I would subscribe to this, I think Kayla and Aaron actually grew real feelings during the wife swap. All Aaron has been talking about is Kayla... in a weird "hero" type of way.

If this ends with Kayla leaving Nick for Aaron, the internet along with kiwi may officially explode. @Null should just retire from that point forward since no story arch will ever be able to top this shit show!

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.24.29 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.24.04 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.23.16 PM.png
Can't wait for KINO tonight... LFG!!!

EDIT: Anyone have the link to the incident report? I'm interested in seeing the line that Aaron encouraged their drug use.
 
Last edited:
for this case, insulting the judge just means he has grounds to ask for a recusal, which will possibly be granted.
I'm doubting he would get one, and even if he did there's only 3 judges in that county that all are probably pals. Asking for a recusal on account of calling your last Judge (your new judge's friend) a retarded whore probably isn't going to result in you being treated any better.
 
While I would subscribe to this, I think Kayla and Aaron actually grew real feelings during the wife swap. All Aaron has been talking about is Kayla... interesting...
View attachment 6023897View attachment 6023899View attachment 6023900

Can't wait for KINO tonight... LFG!!!
Let's get this over with so we can kick this Aaron faggot to the curb once he's done giving us the details he should have been telling to investigators months ago. Here's hoping Warksi and PPP go in on him for doing nothing to protect the children after he's been milked dry of content.
 
I'm doubting he would get one, and even if he did there's only 3 judges in that county that all are probably pals. Asking for a recusal on account of calling your last Judge (your new judge's friend) a retarded whore probably isn't going to result in you being treated any better.
yeah, my official prediction is that he gets it but it won't matter. as you say, there's not many to choose from, and insulting one probably doesn't reflect well on the eyes of the others. more generally, insulting any judge the way he did reflects poorly on his character, and presumably any other judge would become familiar with the clip anyway.
 
I'm doubting he would get one, and even if he did there's only 3 judges in that county that all are probably pals. Asking for a recusal on account of calling your last Judge (your new judge's friend) a retarded whore probably isn't going to result in you being treated any better.
I'd expect a request for a change of venue in this scenario.
 
Breathalyzers are mainly field sobriety tests / hooked into your vehicle's starter; mainly to stop you from driving while drunk.

If they want a continuous monitor, it's something called a SCRAM Bracelet (recently learned about these myself); and it's pretty much a bracelet that constantly monitors your sweat and can detect illegal chemicals.
They actually have an e-monitoring system known as. Soberlink. It is handheld, uses GPS and takes a photograph of the person as they blow into the device. They generally require someone to test several times a day by blowing into it. If you blow over .02, you are required to continue to blow every 15 minutes until it falls under .02. These are regularly used in pretrial supervision and probation periods. The Soberlink is basically a traveling breathalyzer.


This is the Soberlink website and details information regarding the device.
 
Back