Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
If true it's a pretty big '180 from the guy who stopped doing the "daddy nooooo" Tonka meme out of respect for a victim one of his colleagues helped.
I'm doing my best to not blow up and go full fucking psycho; but I missed this, and if true


For those who missed Nick joking about this girl named Maya


For more context on the girl he's joking about:
"The jury awarded the Kowalski family monies for a range of offenses, including wrongfully placing the child under video surveillance for 48 consecutive hours and making her strip down to shorts and a training bra for a photograph.

A hospital staffer, they found, also committed misconduct by sometimes kissing the then 10-year-old and having her sit on her lap."
 
I find it ironic that Nick argued that Monty fucked up and should've sued in the defendant's state rather than Colorado, but then when Nick's the defendant, Monty does exactly that. And Nick files an appeal to get it moved to Colorado (and loses). Nick gave Monty some good advice when he was sober.
During the Vic Mignogna lolsuit, Nick also said Jamie Marchi made a smart choice of hiring a cheap "strip mall" lawyer, and that Rial and Soye were dumbasses for hiring expensive lawyers.
So when Nick faces his own legal troubles.....he hires one of the most expensive lawyers he could find.
I'm surprised Randazza hasn't been driven to drink by having to deal with Nick.
 
If this ends with Kayla leaving Nick for Aaron, the internet along with kiwi may officially explode. @Null should just retire from that point forward since no story arch will ever be able to top this shit show!

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.24.29 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.24.04 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-05-26 at 1.23.16 PM.png
Can't wait for KINO tonight... LFG!!!
Aaron is one of the most annoying parts of this entire saga. He's so desperate not to look like a cuck that he's pulling tall tales out of his ass to make himself sound like a chad. In reality, at the end of the day, April ended up leaving him to stay with the Rekeitas as a throuple, it doesn't matter how much you got from Nick's sloppy seconds, your wife still ultimately chose them over you.

Sorry to say Aaron, but your wife is a whore and you are the definition of a cuck.
 
I’ve heard it’s a common prison trope that most of the time 99% of the D&D clubs are made up of pedophiles. I’ve heard this from interviews of the guy who got arrested for making a school threat on OSRS, he wanted to play with the group when he was in prison but was warned by other inmates that he might be viewed as a pedo/weirdo if he did.
Guess it depends on the prison.

For those who missed Nick joking about this girl named Maya


For more context on the girl he's joking about:
"The jury awarded the Kowalski family monies for a range of offenses, including wrongfully placing the child under video surveillance for 48 consecutive hours and making her strip down to shorts and a training bra for a photograph.

A hospital staffer, they found, also committed misconduct by sometimes kissing the then 10-year-old and having her sit on her lap."
Oh yeah, I'm familiar with that case. Fucking horrible and not the type of thing to make those kinds of jokes about. From the way you described it, I thought the victim got raped until their body was so damaged they were incontinent, so it's slightly better than what I thought. Fucking slightly. Disgusting, Nick. I hope those words haunt you when turn sober, if you ever do.
 
arrest, hearing, and post all that Nick has proven he gives no fucks about anything and that he thinks he is 100% on the right here, Please god I want his next stream to be completely hammered, the moment he presses the live button he will probably see the biggest amount of viewers in a long time.
The gall of this faggot saying after the confirmation of everything we've been saying for over a year and EVEN WORSE that we "know nothing."

We know plenty you sick sack of fucking shit.

And unfortunately for you, now the cops and prosecutors also do.

Burn in HELL!
 
Does anyone know when the Kino casino's going live today?
Looks like it'll be SPADE DIAMOND CLUB HEART AT 7PM EST Screenshot 2024-05-26 122103.png
 
The 2nd degree felony drug charge is a presumptive stayed sentence according to MN sentencing guidelines, unless he has an extensive criminal history.
View attachment 6023612

I am pretty sure that he would have a 0 for criminal history score. I'm not the most familiar with his past but I think I heard that his only prior would be a reckless driving charge which isn't even listed as having a severity level.
View attachment 6023629

The other charges are gross misdemeanors that can be less than a year in jail or a fine.
The other two, if I read correctly, rate a level 6 and 5 for purposes of sentencing.
Unless he really fucks up probation or pre-sentencing he likely will not serve time, he will get fines and probation, from what I have read above and seen on youtube drug court.
I can see getting time is if he acts like a total lunatic in court going pro-se and refusing to admit the slightest bit of accountability and showing no desire to correct his behavior, and the judge sentences him for one of the misdemeanors.
I'm sure libertarian Rackets disagrees but I really don't see the courts as trying to lock up drug users in MN especially if they have kids, I think he will get every opportunity to avoid that.

Yep. Nick has no criminal public records in MN, so a 0 to start. When sentenced for multiple crimes at once, unless they are deemed to arise out of a single course of conduct, you get a point for each previously-pronounced sentencee. Courts are supposed to evaluate the crimes in the order committed. Here, the drugs and firearm are likely a single course of conduct; the neglect-related charges may or may not be.

But per Guidelines, if he got convictions on all items charged so far, the drug charge is 48 months presumptively stayed, the firearm is 21 months presumptively stayed (potentially 27 months if drug charge is sentenced first and situation is not considered a single course of conduct, which is probably is), and endangerment is 18 months presumptively stayed (28 if other two were sentenced first/not a single course of conduct). Likely concurrent (the default) so guideline 48, of which 1 year could be confinement (jail or house arrest-type thing).

That's without aggravating factors. Crime being committed where there was an expectation of privacy, and commission of crime in the presence of a child are both potential aggravating factors (would have to be proved, and unclear if "in the presence of" means literally or if being in the house is enough). Aggravating factors can warrant an upward departure in the sentence.

Downward departure in duration depends on various things, though income and education are not supposed to be factors (nor race, sex, marital status, etc.).

For probation, the analysis is supposed to be whether a defendant is "particularly amenable to probation." It should be noted that for drug offenses, if chemical dependency is a factor, rehab pushes toward being a suitable candidate for probation. There are other factors, of course, and he likely would be considered favorably. However, the guidelines note that among the considerations, alongside age, social support, and record, key considerations for amenability to probation include remorse, cooperation, and attitude before the court. :story:

I'm wondering why (if accurate) they didn't drug/alcohol test him. He was behind the wheel when intercepted. If he'd just taken a kid to school and was over limits, that would be a potential felony. No probable cause, I guess, if not observedly impaired. Got lucky on that, if so.
View attachment 6024076(L)
if you search Kayla's case on the court site she is charged under both Statues in regards to Child Neglect: 609.378.1(a) and Additional Statute: Neglect Child-Knowingly Permit Physical/Sex Abuse (609.378.1(a)(2)).
a2 is the specific charge. You have to cite the parent clause/section because it starts the definition of the crime and the subsection/referred clause in the additional statute section provides the specific violation. There are 3 charges but to understand them you have to look at both citations listed for each.
 
I wonder. If April flips on him could she also bitch about his shit representation in traffic court? Could that get him disbarred? If she cries about all that? Fucking your clients is bad in any profession.

@waffle @Null
it would probably merit some disciplinary action against him, yes. not showing up in court without any justification or excuse is definitely a breach of professional standards.
but probably not disbarred immediately, because it is just a lousy traffic ticket after all.

but if he catches a conviction for 25g+ of coke, that on top of the traffic shit could really get him into trouble with the bar.
 
Tbh the ones i met at Ralphamania where all dysfunctional in one way or another i liked them but they weren't "normal" in the slightest so i see the dudes point to a certain extend.

That’s what I mean too, to be honest.

I get the impression that many Kiwifarmers are not proper normies, but that doesn’t make them all drug addicts.
 
Back