While it may look like nose-guarding, Andrew and Nick had a VERY BAD falling out. I think he's trying to stay neutral to not lose the Nick crowd and not piss off Kiwi.
It's a good argument when you're desperate for anything to cling onto, but as you say there's no suggestion or evidence that the search warrant was defective and by all accounts the cops and CPS spent a week working on it. At best this is a Hail Mary Pass from Lawtube, at worse it'll devolve into some awkward Lolbert sovereign citizen nonsense.
More importantly the cops had a warrant. It's reflexive cope. They might have an argument if they busted in using the exigent circumstances of the "Cope and Sneed" stream, but they were clearly preparing for this raid before that happened. They probably just moved up the schedule after.
Andrew is also the guy who he was going to do one stream on it because it was too close to him and he reached out to try to get Nick to stop several times. We're on stream three. He's either lying about watching all the coverage or he's lying about not watching what Kurt says. His morals seem about as flexible as his understanding of what the truth is because he saw youtube sheckels rolling in if he covered his former good friend Nick. You'd think a lawyer would be better at making weasley worded statements.
Just search this thread for "body destroyed" and you'll probably find the clip.
I don't know, I was laughing pretty hard at 'Scandinavian cuisine is like Auschwitz for T-rexes'.
Andrew is an asshole passport bro who will grift anything he can make a few bucks on.
What is there to gain from the "Nick crowd"?? They're so poor that the trolls have to superchat their lawpope for them.
Like...............................an informant maybe?
when and over what? I totally missed it.
And Nick talked shit about Nate very recently too…
