Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
Andrew to Kiwi Farms: "Go make a thread that defeats the fourth amendment arguments!"

Nigga, we're a gossip forum. We get it, you're a super duper smart boy because you have a legal degree. We're not the obelisk through which you will process your intellectual insecurity complex.

No one is impressed that a lawyer can argue law better than non-lawyers.
I like not a minute later he says that everyone doesn't know all the facts.

What's the fucking point then? No internet lawyer will present some grand argument for or against Rackets. As for a thread I imagine there will be a court case one eventually for the law kiwis to talk about with less BROKE DICK NICK jokes so he can read that one.

Who here said anything about waving constitutional rights anyway? I want every single constitutional right upheld perfectly for Nick so if they throw the book at him I can go laugh at the noseguards harder.
 
Something to consider is this is a Tulpa/Egregore created by the thoughtform of Internet denizens. Its not tied to any Religion or Faith. Theres no specific Rites or Prayers that have been formulated against it. Its something different.

Also burning it unless done properly isn't a good idea. Aside from the amulet perhaps only being a conveyance and it now being in Balldo, you can't just burn a cursed object it can just free whatever inhabits it, and if you're the only person in the vacinity...
It needs to be contained and sealed first.
The letter that accompanied the mediallion had the Seal of Solomon on it.
The Seal was broken. Whoever burned it let the flame break the Seal.
To reseal the Seal of Solomon requires some very specific steps.
Its outlined in the Ars Goetia, but basically you have to be ritually purified, abstain from sex or alcohol or anything that defiles you for a month, and most importantly have faith and an honest desire to be forgiven of all sins.

Nick is fucked lol.
Let's not forget that it has probably been up Chris Chans ass. I can't see any good outcome from setting something that's been up Chris Chans ass on fire. Or setting the graven image of something shoved up Chris Chans ass on fire.

This really is a sign God has abandoned us, isn't it?
 
The report by the pastor was made on the 16th and the warrant was executed on the 23rd. This argument is retarded.

Which implies the court took the report seriously, whatever it was, looked into it further, took their time to find out more information, got their probable cause, wrote up a search warrant, got that warrant signed off and executed it, instead of jumping to conclusions and raiding on day 1.

Yeah but Rekieta or whoever he hires as his lawyer could argue that.
"Did you get any other reports?"
"You battered this poor man's door based on ONE report by ONE person?"
"Have you ever heard of this great product for limp dicks called the bal-"

If they argue that, attack that and hammer in on that they could retroactively invalidate the search warrant, then Balldo is a happy camper.
It's not going to happen, I'm sure limp dick wants it to happen, he's going try to make it happen and we're here for the show and it's going to be funny.
Lawtube can choke on a Jamaican used condom, they can talk down about fan fiction or moral judgments elevating "muh legal analysis" instead, but no one gives a shit about that, normies on twitter care about the saucy stories about drugs, guns and cuck shit.
NO ONE GIVES A SHIT ABOUT LAWTUBE.
 
This used to be mentioned decently often on Nick's show and in the thread.
Oh yeah, now that you said it, I vaguely remember it being discussed.
Actually, I believe it was Cynthia.
My comment: Whatever Nick. Good luck with that. You wanna sue Kiwi for swingers' allegations? I'll see you and raise you this: MDMA, Balldo, LONG porn and anal discussions on stream, your fave porn actresses, ruffied in Dallas with many lost hours, Hedonism, sex toy suitcases, sex swings, St Andrew crosses under your bed for sex, topless gay bars, Drex grooming, wine mom nudes requests, etc etc.
There it is.

:story:
Cynthia was probably right about everything, and that's despite her weird outbursts at posters trying to "make" her assimilate into site culture.

There you have it.
:agree: MDMA
:agree: St. Andrew's Cross
:agree: Porn binges (Pure Pleasure)
:agree: Anal discussions
:agree: Hedonism II
:agree: "Field Kit"
:agree: Swinging
:agree: Topless homoerotic nightclubs
:disagree: We just need to know who his favourite porn actress (and actors) are

Cynthia redeemed?????
:story: NICK.
cyn.jpg
 
Last edited:
I really liked Null's idea earlier - when we get the body cam footage, just make a well-organized list of all the Lawtubers (and I'd personally expand that to others that are known) that tried to excuse child abuse and cocaine use around the kids, note what all they said, and don't let them forget what level they sunk to to defend this guy.

Alternatively, if for any reason we don't get the cam footage, I say when he gets a guilty verdict.

Having said that, if the option were on the table, I would love a dedicated thread just for shitting on everyone who was so morally bankrupt to defend this man's actions against his children.
I think we need a Balldo subforum.

Legal mindset, Uncivil Law, and others are flailing. Barnes (who has served as @Null ’s lawyer) is trying to make this a second amendment case rather than realizing Nick curated his persona to sell to people.
 
I heard him say it but do I believe it? His ex-wife is ok with what he exposed their kids too because he stopped doing it? Starting to think anyone in that area needs their kids taking.
Your guess is as good as mine as to whether he is telling the truth. I am inclined to believe him, it would be a weird thing to lie about because it would give him no benefit at all.
Given by what I saw in family court, I am also not surprised that the ex-wife would be "okay" with it. At least not in the sense of letting continue seeing the children, now that he is out of there. Contrary to popular belief in most cases the mother does want to allow her children to continue seeing the father.

It's unfortunate but questionable parenting is more the rule than the exception. That's life I guess, people are generally somewhat messed up.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I find it strange that this entire discussion is based on the premise that the mandatory report was the only reason for the search warrant. Yeah, if the mandatory report was the singular reason then that's fair, but why are they feverishly arguing under the assumption that there's nothing backing the warrant and that this is just a political hitjob against someone the local courts dislike?
 
Something to consider is this is a Tulpa/Egregore created by the thoughtform of Internet denizens. Its not tied to any Religion or Faith. Theres no specific Rites or Prayers that have been formulated against it. Its something different.
Well not necessarily. If we are getting theological, you may not be able to destroy the demon, but you can drive it away.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Yeah but Rekieta or whoever he hires as his lawyer could argue that.
"Did you get any other reports?"
"You battered this poor man's door based on ONE report by ONE person?"
"Have you ever heard of this great product for limp dicks called the bal-"

If they argue that, attack that and hammer in on that they could retroactively invalidate the search warrant, then Balldo is a happy camper.
It's not going to happen, I'm sure limp dick wants it to happen, he's going try to make it happen and we're here for the show and it's going to be funny.
Lawtube can choke on a Jamaican used condom, they can talk down about fan fiction or moral judgments elevating "muh legal analysis" instead, but no one gives a shit about that, normies on twitter care about the saucy stories about drugs, guns and cuck shit.
NO ONE GIVES A SHIT ABOUT LAWTUBE.
Lawtube's record is one of complete and utter failure. Save perhaps Rittenhous. Which even the normies could see was bullshit.
 
How the fuck is lawtube, specifically barnes and mindset, making legal determinations about how this has never happened to first time drug offenders.
Do they know more about this than anyone else? I wonder if they'll eat humble pie if it turns out it was a rekieta kid that went to the pastor.
 
Oh yeah, now that you said it, I vaguely remember it being discussed.
Actually, I believe it was Cynthia.

There it is.

:story:
Cynthia was probably right about everything, and that's despite her weird outbursts at posters trying to "make" her assimilate into site culture.

There you have it.
:agree: MDMA
:agree: St. Andrew's Cross
:agree: Porn binges (Pure Pleasure)
:agree: Anal discussions
:agree: Hedonism II
:agree: "Field Kit"
:agree: Swinging
:agree: Topless homoerotic nightclubs
:disagree: We just need to know who his favourite porn actress (and actors) are

Cynthia redeemed?????
:story: NICK.
Everything that she brings up in that post was literally talked about on streams so yeah she was right but it was all public info
 
Back