Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 81 31.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 84 32.2%

  • Total voters
    261
Doesn't apply. Nick identifies as as "white bread ass nigga."
I think with the gun and drug charges, Rackets is blacker than Drex and Bibble combined
Sterling example of their "fuck you, I got mine" mentality. They call themselves lolbert, but the fact is that they're Egoists. And retarded ones at that.
90% of Lolberts just want the liberty to do illegal drugs and diddle kids under the age of consent. The "party" has been a joke for decades.
I do actually agree with Nick that Fischer is kinda retarded. So, I'm not her. She is dumb retarded, I am instead Kiwi Retarded (good)
I'd still be careful. Rackets might squeeze you for your juices. :stress:
Is spectre ok after his internet daddy's arrest? lol
Oh shit, who will get custody of speck-tree?!

Listening to the Aaron bits. Pedestrian question but maybe someone can explain this to me: Why didn't they hire housekeeping help? They could afford it. I'd prioritize having someone come in to do the laundry and dishes over driving them to dance classes, right? And Rackets could afford both.
Probably didn't want maids either stealing their drugs and balldos or snitching on them.
Exactly what Judge Fischer would say to hide herself....

Interesting.
Have we seen Mistake post when Fischer is working? If the answer is no we might have an answer.
Has Kurt ever cooked a Dirty Burger?
Every burger Kurt cooks is dirty.
 
Nate gonna stream about Viva and Barnes dog shit takes in a little while. Ill give nate the benefit of the doubt since his takes are based on observable reality and facts aka hes a rational human being unlike loltube.
Been listening for the last 45 minutes to an hour. He’s actually being very level headed and logical about this and he’s basically calling out Barnes on his balldoguarding bullshit.
 
All of this “my friend, Rekieta” is reminding me of this quote from the TV show Hannibal.
IMG_4752.png
 
Barnes may actually be hoping to be Nick's attorney. He's certified in Minnesota and has portrayed himself knowing everything about Minnesota since the '20 election.
I have heard people say this before, but I don't believe he is licensed in MN. The one Robert Barnes listed in the MJB database is an entirely different guy. Unless he goes by some other name.

Boo!

@Dixieland Buckaroo, it's Boo!

Boo, if you see this, I hope you come back to the Farms. At least for this thread. You had good takes on this.
 
Regarding Arron on Kino Casino: I might regret saying, but I believe the general thrust of his testimony. I don't see any reason to doubt anything he said of Rekieta as a jealous, controlling cult leader in the making. It certainly fit everything what we've seen this thread.

Most surprising was how he talked about Mrs. Rakieta. I thought he was just coping with being absolutely cucked by Nick, but it did seem like he really did truly develop some deep feeling for her. It makes me think that the most unreliable parts of his stories concern her more that anybody else. I think he looks at her as pretty much a pure victim in the whole affair; but I suspect she is guilty of a lot more than what Arron is willing to admit.

People have already said this, but I'll say again: he's probably underestimating his drug intake and he's also underestimating how much the children (both Rekieta's and his own) knew about the degenerate goings-on. Why, I don't know. Maybe he's protecting himself or others, or he can't admit it to himself.
 
I did too and this is why I am actually angry at Nick and not just hamming it up as I often do. I am disgusted not just at Nick but at myself for falling for his bullshit.
I never liked the guy but I think falling for a public figure’s schtick is inevitable and in-and-of itself is not a big deal. Of course, live and learn, - but can you really afford to scrutinise every public figure? Even if you could, you’re scrutinising a single public-facing facet of their life.

You shouldn’t even be invested in a celebrity in the first place, just enjoy the show without swallowing the guy’s load. People who go around nose-guarding him should be ashamed. Christians/Conservatives who idealised him as a role model should be embarrassed.
 
NATE THE LAWYER SUMMARY
I am summarizing it as if he is saying the points. I type pretty quick so immediately dictated what he said in regards to each Viva & Barnes argument.
Before he starts, he lays some groundwork:
  • Search warrant could be for anything... and we still don't know for what:
    • Child endangerment/neglect
    • Drugs
  • The probable cause for the arrest is valid
    • "We went to your house... we found drugs... we arrested you."
  • Pastor who gave the mandatory report to police
    • We do not know if that mandatory report was the probable cause for the search warrant
    • We need to see the affidavit in order to learn what the probable cause was
Then reacts to VIVA & BARNES:
  • V&B: Nick was a critic of the judge and prosecutor and that's why they went after him
    • NATE: That is one hell of an assumption to make, and if that were the case, all parties involvement would eventually come out and they would be dismissed since that all would be on record
  • V&B: The Pastor reporting to the police should only have called for a "wellness check"
    • NATE: You will not see the pastor as the reporter in the probable cause document on the arrest, therefore they are wrong
      • We don't know if the pastor's complaint led to the search warrant
      • There could be other reasons for the search warrant - like drugs - which lead to the search warrant
      • The fact that we still don't have the probable cause affidavit, they don't know anything
  • V&B: The pastor should have kept that private privelge
    • NATE: Again, we still don't know what exactly the probable cause was for the search, so you're again, ASSUMING!
  • V&B: The mandatory reporting law SHOULD ONLY lead to a wellness check
    • NATE: WRONG! It can lead to a wellness check OR a raid
      • Gives examples about a daycare he went after when he was an Asst. District Attorney where kids had bruises on them and they got a search warrant over a wellness check
  • V&B: Nick has criticized all these people online from the judge to the prosecutor and they're going after them
    • NATE: If they did go after Nick, it's a 1ST AMENDMENT VIOLATION!!! FREE SPEECH!!!
  • V&B: The judge who signed the search warrant signed off on everything
    • NATE: No, there are a number of different judges you go thru from the search warrant to the affidavit to the arraignment... Nice try!
  • V&B: The First Amendment is his best defense
    • NATE: No it's not, it's actually the weakest. And none of the amendments are going to help you here.
  • V&B: Nick's guns have nothing to do with what happened.
    • NATE: If you ever use illegal drugs, it is illegal to possess a firearm at the same time. You can have a legal gun at anytime, as long as there is ZERO illegal drugs on you.
      • The crime is you had a gun with illegal narcotics. Pretty simple.
      • This is what Hunter Biden is going through right now.
  • V&B: Conditions on his $50,000 is criminal punishment
    • NATE: Bail is not criminal punishment. It's a way to make sure you come back to court, ESPECIALLY when it's a charge where you're facing 25 years in prison!
  • V&B: Drugs done in private in his home aren't that bad because it's his private home.
    • NATE: I'm sorry... drugs are illegal everywhere you go. Whether you're in your home or not in your home.
  • V&B: They would have to prove he used the gun while on cocaine.
    • NATE: Ummmm no, you had a felony amount of cocaine next to a gun (loaded or not). It's against federal law.
  • V&B: There are no signs that Nick PHYSICALLY harmed any of his children
    • NATE: If I take my kid and hold him over a bridge, they could have been harmed and you would be charged with recklessness.
      • If i didn't see the child, it's neglect.
      • The charge is endangering a child = if there is cocaine in the house, a gun unsecured, it's ENDANGERMENT

TLDR NATE ARGUMENTS in rebuttal to VIVA & BARNES:
  • 1st Amendment (free speech)
    • NATE: Complete joke
      • IF the judge plotted a conspiracy to go after Nick because of what he said, that's a violation of his FREE SPEECH. The judge would be removed so fast...
  • 2nd Amendment (2A)
    • NATE: Complete joke, he chose to give up those rights by having illegal narcotics
  • 4th Amendment (illegal search and seizure)
    • NATE: You haven't seen the probable cause affidavit so you literally have no idea why his home was searched
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure if anyone posted the inverse of this "leak" of the sherrifs report from MELIN... The backside of the page states:
"
born in 2007 in charge. MELIN was unsure if that was standard or not.
MELIN advised that nobody told him an ...DETAILS.... possible neglect an/or drug use. There was
zero reports of any physical or sexual abuse and that the kids were not in any immediate danger at the
"

Why would a mandatory reporter report zero physical or sexual abuse and that the kids were not in any immediate danger? And why would they smash a door down?
Speculating here, but maybe someone else reported physical or sexual abuse (consistent with Kayla's charge) but when the pastor was asked, he didn't know anything about that? He might have only (known and) reported on the neglect or something.
 
Good to see he's still exactly the same. Despite having until August to make himself look as good as humanly possible to a judge and jury, this is how he's spending his days. Fighting with people online, trying to act a clown in people's chats.

You really can tell he's role-playing his own lawyer, as in my opinion, any competent lawyer of his in this situation would tell him to get off the internet, check into rehab, and do everything you possibly can to show you're trying to get better.

But that would admitting his internet detractors were right. IMPOSSIBRE

We sure did nigga! Couldn't have done it without you and your videos.
Aw thanks. I may not have a Sonichu medallion, but I do have a Polar Bear medal. I cherish it.

Nick didn’t lie about everything! Just mostly everything
I really wish Coomy was following all the Aaron antics following the arrest, or at least referenced numbers, as this would have been the perfect chance to throw out that "online detractors" were right on the money 30% of the time, and mostly right 50% of the time. Would have made it extra special.
 
What he's doing is sidling back up to Camelot after he discarded him previously. It's because he at least knows he's got few friends left and Camelot is likely gullible enough to believe he's trying to genuinely be friends again.
They can start a little community on Youtube called "Coomtube"
 
1:37:40 Can't clip right now.

It's going to come out that Aaron is the other part of the probable cause for that warrant. Locking it in now.
That's an interesting theory and also accounts for him quickly pivoting to saying "Oh it was the pastor guys! It wasn't Kiwifarms."

Maybe a way to add "blame" to the pastor and get Kiwi eyes off of him?
 
Not surprised there. Out of all of lawtube, he's probably the only one i'd hire. He was a cop, prosecutor and defense attorney. He has a pretty well rounded view of the whole system.
Nate is looking at this pretty logically.

In the stream, he says if his client's arrest was the result of a search warrant, the first thing he attacks is the search warrant, probable cause, etc. It's basically what Barnes is arguing. In a vacuum, it's a sound argument to make. You can't violate constitutional rights, even if the defendant is a coked up fuck head.

Barnes' problem is he doesn't know what the probable cause is. No one does, since it's not released. And, as Nate says, if Barnes argues in favor of a bad warrant, Nate can argue in the opposite direction that the warrant was good, because we don't know what the warrant says.
 
Back