State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
What I'm getting at is this:
1. How likely is it that they used Kiwi Farms specifically to get footage that Nick had removed?
2. How likely is it that the re upload of that footage that they happened to click on was accompanied by the dulcet tones of Null struggling to breathe as Nick clicked the fat dragon porn for the 5th time?
3. How likely is it that the cuck was accidentally right, and KF did indirectly put Nick in jail, via archiving him? (I consider this a win btw)
1) Very likely they went through the thread for footage. It likely won't be admissible in court, but enough for PC for a warrant, and they don't need it for court because they got the stash.
2) I'm not sure, but it would be hilarious.
3) The cuck was wrong. He said we turned him in, and we did nothing of the sort. And yes, I'm guessing it's about an 80% chance that KFs Nick thread is what pointed the detective in the right direction, but we're not responsible for his own actions he put on the internet getting him in trouble.
 
Holy shit, Judge Jennifer Fischer authorized the warrant after the pillstream :story:
Two questions spring to mind:
1. What are the odds that "Anime Sucks, Cope and Sneed" will be used as proof of his state of mind? How many times did he re-read that superchat? Four?
2. What are the possible defences Nick can use? The only ones I can think of are "I was only pretended to be a coked-up retard," and "It was only booze."
 
Here is terrible handwriting dude, just so y'all have an accurate model for your voodoo dolls.

Screenshot 2024-05-28 204742.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
When the raid first happened, okay, pray for Nick, let's wait and see what else comes out, I feel you; but the more comes out, comes on, let's not fucking play games.
Even if you want to pretend to do the whole "Christian forgiveness" thing, nowhere are you commanded to forgive and forget. If Nick seeks redemption and changes, he can be forgiven. But his actions will never be forgotten, nor should they be.

Do the white knights need to be reminded that Nicky had a Nanny who presumably for YEARS took care of these kids, and suddenly the minute she’s gone everything goes to shit cause Daddy is literally strung out on booze struggling to eat anything?
It really seems that the intensification of neglect occurred in the last 2 months after Aaron was exiled from the Rekieta home. I don't know how much Aaron was telling the truth about doing things with the Rekieta kids, but I can totally believe (granted, without trustworthy evidence) that the Rekieta household's behavior significantly declined in the past 7 weeks. Just from personal experience, if there are 4 people living together with drugs but one is less into the drugs, and then that one person leaves, the remaining three will get deeper into the drugs. It's the same thing with any social activity. I really believe that when things became a menage a trois with April the bangmaid living there full time, the kids' situation became a lot worse.

This is why I can't put full blame on Aaron. What he saw 2 months ago was probably not the state of the household 1 week ago. He's still very blameworthy, though.
2. What are the possible defences Nick can use? The only ones I can think of are "I was only pretended to be a coked-up retard," and "It was only booze."
He can do all the normal attacks on the warrant's validity. I don't practice criminal law but I did expect there to be more particularity in the description of what was to be searched. Maybe it's standard to basically say "search the entire house and person" but I would expect them to specify where the search would occur. I could be reading things wrong, and maybe it's more of a "search the house for evidence of child neglect including drugs" and the discovery of drugs in plain view provided probable cause for further searches. But that's my only real question about the search warrant, and it's probably just because I don't practice the relevant law.
 
I'm sure that would be a typical outcome in a typical case but Nick's case is far from typical. It has all the baggage that comes with his e-daddy status. Even with all of that, I can imagine Nick getting this sort of deal if he just owned up to everything, admitted he needs help, etc. But is he going to do that? It sure doesn't seem like it! I wonder if he will actually try and take it to trial.

I sent the complaint to a friend who is an actual on-the-ground criminal defense attorney in Minnesota. He handles these kinds of low-level criminal cases every day.

His opinion was that the offer from the prosecution would be 48 months suspended on the drug charge and dropping the gun and neglect charges. Probation for a while longer than that. Treatment would be required as part of the probation. CPS would do its own thing because it's not part of the criminal case.

He also told me the facts support a sentence under Minn. Stat. 609.11, subd. 5:

any defendant convicted of an offense listed in subdivision 9 in which the defendant or an accomplice, at the time of the offense, had in possession or used, whether by brandishing, displaying, threatening with, or otherwise employing, a firearm, shall be committed to the commissioner of corrections for not less than three years, nor more than the maximum sentence provided by law.​

That's a mandatory minimum of three years. Prosecutors will make it part of their offer that if you take the probation for the one charged offense, they won't move for a 609.11 sentence. That's the stick to encourage a defendant to take the carrot.

ETA: to clarify about the suspended sentence and probation.
 
My favorite/pet/most likely theory:
  • Nick's been known to his (small) community, I believe he said he used to help teach or tutor or was otherwise involved in the homeschool co-op, probably taken as the somewhat-irreverent but overall likable and respectable guy that the Internet knew him as
  • His midlife crisis hits, he starts leaning on the booze harder, taking his wife to Jamaica to get blacked, the Internet begins telling him to pull up, his habits exacerbate and people in his personal life begin to notice something is... off
  • Eventually Balldo spirals to the point where people are gossiping, the pastor and/or multiple someone(s) reach out and ask if he's okay, being a defiant asshole he brushes them off and starts ranting about pedophile priests, perhaps because in his coked out mind the church is trying to fuck his kids instead of feed them, all while his family falls apart
  • Things hit a point where CPS has probably gotten some tips, the mandatory reporting comes in, and the law realizes they're going to have to do something about this, as well as:
    • Even if he's a retard, he's a lawyer with resources who will absolutely fight this every inch of the way
    • There is no way they can intimidate, persuade, or scare him into a plea deal, probation, any of those
    • There's absolutely something going on, and the longer the situation drags on the more the kids have to suffer through it
  • The state spends a week stuffing the case to the gills with evidence - cokestream, reports, affadavits or whatever from congregation members, like 5x what you'd need to justify a search of the place AND enough to suggest there are multiple fuck-you-in-the-ass charges they can back up
  • They execute the search, arrest the Rekietas, get the kids out, and find a ton of concrete evidence to absolutely nail this case to the wall
I'd bet money that as soon as Fischer got wind of this, as soon as she finished wringing her hands in vengeance, she told the cops to make sure the probable cause was AIRTIGHT and that they figured they could build enough of a case to put those faggots away for a decade, because they'd only get one shot at this and if it wasn't perfect then Rekieta could just endlessly fight it. Look how much of a stink he's made over his stupid Montagraph suit, and god forbid they got to keep custody of the kids while filing endless injunctions.

The evidence looks like Nick is fucked, and although there's some doubt because you never know, I would also expect that the state knows Nick well enough and wouldn't pull the trigger unless they were pretty damn sure they could fuck him. Even if a smart person would take a plea deal, and Nick decided to be smart for once this year, what if they just... don't offer him one? Make an example, crucify the bastard, decide he isn't the kind of """first-time offender""" you want getting any leniency, he isn't just a good boy who wants to be an astronaut. I'd believe it.

Source: it was revealed to me in a dream
 
I sent the complaint to a friend who is an actual on-the-ground criminal defense attorney in Minnesota. He handles these kinds of low-level criminal cases every day.

His opinion was that the offer from the prosecution would be 48 months suspended on the drug charge and dropping the gun and neglect charges. Probation for a while longer than that. Treatment would be required as part of the probation. CPS would do its own thing because it's not part of the criminal case.

He also told me the facts support a sentence under Minn. Stat. 609.11, subd. 5:

any defendant convicted of an offense listed in subdivision 9 in which the defendant or an accomplice, at the time of the offense, had in possession or used, whether by brandishing, displaying, threatening with, or otherwise employing, a firearm, shall be committed to the commissioner of corrections for not less than three years, nor more than the maximum sentence provided by law.​

That's a mandatory minimum of three years. Prosecutors will make it part of their offer that if you take the probation for the one charged offense, they won't move for a 609.11 sentence. That's the stick to encourage a defendant to take the carrot.

ETA: to clarify about the suspended sentence and probation.

Yeah, like I said, if Nick was actually willing to play ball and take a plea bargain, he could probably get that outcome. But it seems like he is in total denial mode. Are prosecutors still going to offer that kind of deal if somebody takes it to trial and loses? I doubt it!
 
Can we try and figure out what the cop is saying with his godawful handwriting?:
View attachment 6029435
View attachment 6029436
View attachment 6029437
Ok, I translated it for everyone

1: 25 G’s of cocaine
2: blue Balldo
3: red Balldo
4: black dildo
5: black dildo with Jamaican flag
6: Black Balldo
7: anal lube
8: Men’s buttplug
9: gay porn
10: 45 bottles of liquor
11: framed poster of dick masterson
12: “kill list” of all the incel Scandinavian prudes in his town
13: dart board with the face of Joshua moon on it
14: yellow Balldo
15: purple Balldo
16: Jamaican flag balldo
17: Balldo with “Drex” inscribed on it
18: barrel of adderal pills
19: kiwi farms user “kill list”
20: tranny porn
21: love poems to a “Mandy”
22: a stash of records that are all remixes of songs for and about Mandy
23: trans flag Balldo
 
I think Rekieta refusing to let the cops in and them having to batter the gates down is because lawyers say NOT to let the cops inside your house or car so that when they break in whatever they find is inadmissible because of "unlawful searches and seizures"

I don't know how well that tactic applies to Rekieta. The police report says they showed him the warrant AFTER breaking down the gates, so maybe you could argue that was unnecessary, but him throwing warrant down on the ground probably would've happened BEFORE they found the guns and drugs
 
Back