Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
Consumption isn't the only metric of whether a policy is working or not though.
Especially when one considers that the initial fall clearly didn't last long. The claim that prohibition worked requires ignoring the rapid development of alternative supply and production and the rapid restoration of drinking levels just a few of years into the period. The smuggling and illicit production of alcohol was massive growth industry in the early 20s and arguably contributed to a much less healthy overall drinking culture, as you outline. Prohibition only works if you can control the production of the prohibited substance and prevent it being smuggled over your border, which can never be the case for alcohol, because it is both easy to smuggle and easy to produce.
 
hey man you can do whatever you want with enough money just look at literally any politician


That's a point but even with money if you come to his house and physically remove any cards, cash, valuables, etc and/or have your guy "convince" him to go to rehab it takes care of a lot of the problem. Then it's just a matter of finding the right palms to grease.
And then he's sober so long as you hire a full-time tard wrangler to follow him around 24/7. I don't think his parents are Mob bosses. But if they have any control of his means of support they certainly have some leverage. It's obvious he's never paid for anything in his life because the moment he did get any money entirely within his control he squandered it like a trailer park wigger who just won the lottery.
 
Especially when one considers that the initial fall clearly didn't last long. The claim that prohibition worked requires ignoring the rapid development of alternative supply and production and the rapid restoration of drinking levels just a few of years into the period. The smuggling and illicit production of alcohol was massive growth industry in the early 20s and arguably contributed to a much less healthy overall drinking culture, as you outline. Prohibition only works if you can control the production of the prohibited substance and prevent it being smuggled over your border, which can never be the case for alcohol, because it is both easy to smuggle and easy to produce.

Prohibition failed because the political capital was spent and couldn't keep it going. The temperance movement was a woman movement as they abhorred what alcohol was doing to their fathers, husbands, and brothers and what alcohol caused them to do others. I seriously doubt that US drinking was better pre prohibition.

You get less of what you tax (prohibit) and more of what you (allow) subsidize. This is true of everything. Marijuana consumption has increased dramatically as it has been increasingly legalized. I'm not interested in debating the specific merits or demerits of alcohol or Marijuana consumption, but to claim that prohibiting them doesn't work to decrease usage is not very accurate.

Somehow the Saracens have mostly eliminated the consumption of alcohol for a billion people.
 
Especially when one considers that the initial fall clearly didn't last long. The claim that prohibition worked requires ignoring the rapid development of alternative supply and production and the rapid restoration of drinking levels just a few of years into the period. The smuggling and illicit production of alcohol was massive growth industry in the early 20s and arguably contributed to a much less healthy overall drinking culture, as you outline. Prohibition only works if you can control the production of the prohibited substance and prevent it being smuggled over your border, which can never be the case for alcohol, because it is both easy to smuggle and easy to produce.
They inadvertently pushed society to become more clever.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

How Wine Bricks Saved The U.S. Wine Industry During Prohibition
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope Nick celebrates his first live stream from his “new studio” (halfway house) and celebrates with a gentlemanly handle of whisky chased by “powered sugar”.

Lady Rackets doesn’t have to pretend to looking after the kids so she can join in! No whisky for her I’m afraid, she can drink still water and sweat out months of Colombian booger sugar.

Cheers!!!
 
i was just wondering, since from playboard stats, Nick got around 1.2 million USD for superchats for the totality of his youtube career, and youtube takes a 30% cut, giving him around 840000, and he admitted that he paid around 300000 for the shitty paintings, so he has around 540000 left.

if I am led to believe that he started snorting coke in January, how much he has spent on coke? we need some coke detective to crack the case!
 
i was just wondering, since from playboard stats, Nick got around 1.2 million USD for superchats for the totality of his youtube career, and youtube takes a 30% cut, giving him around 840000, and he admitted that he paid around 300000 for the shitty paintings, so he has around 540000 left.

if I am led to believe that he started snorting coke in January, how much he has spent on coke? we need some coke detective to crack the case!
Don't forget taxes nigga. Iirc he said he pays close to 40%.
 
i was just wondering, since from playboard stats, Nick got around 1.2 million USD for superchats for the totality of his youtube career, and youtube takes a 30% cut, giving him around 840000, and he admitted that he paid around 300000 for the shitty paintings, so he has around 540000 left.
Have you missed six figures for the Monty lawsuit with about as much to come, taxes including self-employment tax, dealer price for the Rustang, the trips to Hedonism, etc. etc. etc.?
 
Back