Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
I think its hysterical that people keep speculating about Nick maybe losing his law license. Even if he did keep it what the fuck good will it do him? EVERYBODY knows hes an off-kilter child abusing drug addict now. Even if he kicks the drugs, would YOU want YOUR case to be the next one that potentially sends him off onto another tirade about a judge or some shit? Fuck no, that license is basically worthless now unless he can find some kinda anonymous way to use it.
It's like they think he actually practices law to begin with.
 
There are two houses on Nick's property; both are owned by his trust fund.

Maybe April and Nick are living in the rental house, and Kayla is living in the main house.

This could be why Nick needs to move the studio.
It's actually two distinct properties with different addresses and lot numbers, and share a boundary line. The big one they've been living in has been owned by the trust since 2018, the smaller one is in Nick and Kayla's name since 2009 (admittedly, the trust may have provided the funding, but they appear to be the owners of record- and it also appears that "Robert Rekieta" paid their last overdue property tax bill.

It's possible that one or both of them got kicked out by Nick's father/grandfather/whoever controls the trust- but this is pure speculation. For the smaller house, if everything is as it appears, Big Daddy could cut them off from financial help (although he seems to have covered their taxes), but probably can't take that house away from them.

This is all speculation, and likely low-probability, but it will be interesting to see if their big house ends up on the market, at some point.

It's also possible that the trust isn't messing with them at all, and the two of them are having a domestic falling out- think of it- wealthy couple, both busted for drugs, swinging/open marriage, obviously having lots of issues- including contradicting each other in statements to the cops (is April a visitor or a live-in nanny?), AND they've at least temporarily lost custody of their five kids, They're at VERY high risk of divorce or at least some serious domestic upheaval- hell, I'd be surprised if they haven't been screaming at each other over a lot of this, even if it's (where's my coke, or why didn't you flush it all, or why did you talk to the cops)
 
I'm probably a dummy then.

That's what I thought it was, a religious symbol.

I was listening to it live. When the cross was brought up, my thoughts were "I know you're religious Balldo but what the fuck, most hotels have copies of the Bible tucked in already, you don't need more religious symbols. You're not even that devout."

You can imagine my shock and subsequent disgust when they explained it was a "sex thing". I was caught completely off guard. I automatically thought of religion because I know this doomsday conspiracy believing Catholic guy who would bring a cross to hotels and other venues he stayed at. Nice guy but also a looney.

I looked up the device and it was quite a large piece of kit. Why anyone would bring that out of their fuck caves was beyond me. Why anyone would buy one in the first place was beyond me. I'm not even religious. I'll take the L on that.

PPP went immediately to "sex cross" after Aaron finished and a confused Warski was staring at the webcam. I wonder what kind of freakish stuff that fat Canadian watches.

Thanks Balldo, I didn't want to know what a Balldo is, I didn't want to know what a fucking sex cross is, and I certainly didn't want to know there's "field kits" disguised as normal luggage.


St. Andrew's Cross AND exhibitionism.
🍺 :really:
To once again religiously sperg. The type of cross got renamed by its association with St. Andrew, the brother of St. Peter. Andrew like Peter upon his capture basically asked not to be given the honor of imitating Christ’s crucifixion. So instead he was crucified using an X-cross which became associated with him.

St. Peter, by tradition, was crucified upside down. An upside down crucifix is his symbol. Satanists using it is literally some retard shit and you should laugh at them for that.
 
Speaking of family structure and time, when's the last time they got a whole weekend with sober parents who organized the day and interacted with them the whole time? When did Kayla last let the kids help bake cookies or Nick show a kid how to refill the wiper fluid on a car? (Or vice versa). If ever, it's been awhile.
It might have been on one of their last trips to Florida they actually brought the kids but only spent a couple of days with them and then left for their own hedonistic vacation. There was speculation that they had gone to hedonism 2 a second time. Then there was the Labor Day (?) church camping trip/retreat that they do every year where Balldo spent the entire time arguing with randos on twitter. What I am trying to say is it has been a while.
 
The funny thing about Andrew is that he's a pretty smart guy even though Andrew is a municipal / special district lawyer in the state of Florida giving solid advice to Nick that the dozens of other lawyers that knows Nick gave as well. LM does his own practice that allows him to work in Asia. While Nick just did employment law and doesn't seem to do anything anymore other than snort lines of coke.
Yeah, Mindset's advice is sound and deep down, Nick KNOWS his advice is sound. He's just assblasted right now because all of his Internet friends are trusting their lying eyes over his cope rationalizations and conspiracy theories and he considers it a personal betrayal.
 
I'm sorry if this has been mentioned before but i just noticed today is World's Children Day

Call me gay, but I unironically wish all the best to Rekieta's children, for them to find the strength and wisdom and push through rough circumstances they found themselves in THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN. Fuck EVS, Fuck Barnes, Fuck Nick Rekieta.
That is a very lovely sentiment. I agree. Thank you.

I almost feel bad following that up by reminding everybody here that June is also "Pride Month," and Nick will be an ENORMOUS FAGGOT.
 
How do you expect a literal child half his age and half his DNA to be better?

TBH I suspect Rekieta has good genes or he would have been far worse or dead by now. Also, if I am to be fair, he is gifted with intelligence. Now intelligent does not mean smart. He is dumber then a rock. Intelligent does not mean wise, he is as wise as a worn sock.

By that his kids are hopefully gifted with the health and intelligence genes. The real downfall, not that I know, seems to have started 2 years ago or there about. First slow, then accelerating like Sean on a butter slide with White Claw, meat balls and 2.0 at the bottom. (No diss on Sean hah)

Nick is a fucktard by his own choices. The retrogression into a rakehell, hedonistic, libertine has been for all to see. Something I suspect was early defined in him and that he finally let loose. But for what I know it started way before. He was good at keeping a mask.

As far as his kids go I won't say one bad word about them. Poor kids. If the "hungry and dirty clothes" is not as bad as reported; the mere fact their father is such a exhibitionist in regards to his gayness online is a severe psychological issue in of itself. As if peers do not learn who he is online? As if they do not one day uncover the degenerate specimen their father is. Not to say a lot of it already has flowed trough. I at least knew a lot of shit my parents were convinced I did not know.

A swing, drug, alcoholic filthy den whilst professing being Christian. That alone has to make their heads twist around and leave life long marks. As if they was not aware? Nick is either dumber then I thought, or he is more of a sociopath then I feared. Your dad drives you around still drunk from the night before, with some THC gummies and angel powder on days. Or how is breakfast and dinner?
 
It's actually two distinct properties with different addresses and lot numbers, and share a boundary line. The big one they've been living in has been owned by the trust since 2018, the smaller one is in Nick and Kayla's name since 2009 (admittedly, the trust may have provided the funding, but they appear to be the owners of record
Okay I think I've finally got it. Thanks

It's also possible that the trust isn't messing with them at all, and the two of them are having a domestic falling out- t
I think you're right and that this is the most likely situation....

Even in a healthy marriage this course of events would be an incredible source of stress... Especially when you consider all the dirty laundry (heh) is now out in the open.

The two sides of the family may have different attitudes towards the situation and want to handle it differently. Even if cordial this could be stressful.

Nick's family could blame Kayla and Kayla's family could blame Nick. Kayla might want a plea deal while Nick wants to fight it to the bitter end. Kayla might want the kids back ASAP but Nick could care less.

Nick might have refused to pay Kayla's bail because he's angry that she didn't flush the drugs. Or maybe Kayla's family insisted she get treatment and Nick refused.

The possibilities are endless but I think it's reasonable to guess there's big trouble in their marriage.

I think it's plausible that Nick and Kayla might be estranged but living in proximity.

Especially if April is still living with Nick.
 
I almost feel bad following that up by reminding everybody here that June is also "Pride Month," and Nick will be an ENORMOUS FAGGOT
What do you mean will be? You're saying it as if Cokieta hasn't been an enormous faggot for the last 2 years, it's pride year all around for him.

Also, I'm betting that the whole stuff he's working on in the 'new studio' or whatever the fuck it is, is because he is setting it up in the other property due to being separated from Kayla.
 
The conspiracy is true
Your nose guarding is disgusting
This is punishment from God
Song aged like fine wine.
1717261079740.png

 
It's possible that one or both of them got kicked out by Nick's father/grandfather/whoever controls the trust- but this is pure speculation.
His father is very unlikely to be the one in control of any trust for reasons you would understand if you had read the thread at all and both his grandfathers are dead. I get that you haven't been reading the thread before last week but would it be possible for you to stop shitting it up with obviously wrong nonsense?'

and it also appears that "Robert Rekieta" paid their last overdue property tax bill.
Once again. It's the "Robert Lord Property Trust", not Robert Rekieta. This was already in the thread if you go back to 2019 or so.

You're posting shit that has been in the thread for five years, just wrong.
 
I see a lot of criticism of Kayla for her "role" in all this, but let's keep a reality check on what happened here, really. Nick and Kayla had a good marriage and a good family. It was Nick that went into the gutter of the Internet and once we was reprogrammed to think "yeah you know there really isn't anything wrong with foul language, aggressive postering, speaking 'my mind', sex and multiple partners and drugs", he then sought to bring her down to his level - all the while thinking this new thinking was actually elevated thinking.

This degraded behavior, amoral approach is merely the drug that is offered by the gutter of the Internet, and Nick got addicted and then he dragged her into it.

Like with all addictions, Nick had a good time, made money and this was "evidence" that the "new way of life" must be "OK and it is working", but like all cons, addictions etc. they always have short term gains, until eventually the behavior shows the true cost.

I blame Nick rightly for dragging his family down, he knew the immoral choices he was making and that they went against his own code of conduct, and did it anyways. A code of conduct is supposed to be the stop gap that prevents one from falling into these situations - it is not a measure of happiness, (i.e. happiness is not the indicator if a choice is right - the code is) because even if it feels good at the time, or seems beneficial, the code let's you know you have wandered.

These fools like Nick simply have no discipline. If they had discipline, they would not fall into these traps. Men easily fall into the lust and satisfaction of our primal urges, and Nick is no different from any man in this regard, where he differs is that he has no discipline.
 
Camelot claims to have known about Nick fucking April for at least the last 10 months. The Sean seethe clip where Nick asserts he and his wife are monogamous is, (as far as I know) more recent than 10 months. I'm sure at this point Nick has probably moved out with April while Kayla has been more receptive to family outreach. I sincerely hope she takes all of his money and he still has to pay Monty.
Also curious to see how EVS reacts to Nick apologizing to Eric July. Granted, Nick will fuck that up again anyway next time he's on stream with dax or evs. It's about the only thing he's allowed to talk about anymore and they're probably the only people he will talk to on stream.
 
It's also possible that the trust isn't messing with them at all, and the two of them are having a domestic falling out- think of it- wealthy couple, both busted for drugs, swinging/open marriage, obviously having lots of issues- including contradicting each other in statements to the cops (is April a visitor or a live-in nanny?), AND they've at least temporarily lost custody of their five kids, They're at VERY high risk of divorce or at least some serious domestic upheaval- hell, I'd be surprised if they haven't been screaming at each other over a lot of this, even if it's (where's my coke, or why didn't you flush it all, or why did you talk to the cops)
The last time Baldo even mentioned Kayla was when he demanded to represent her in Court. All of his public raving since have been all about him. Let's be honest this is about as flamed out as a Marriage can get short of a twisted murder suicide. The whole "swinging" lifestyle was the two of them seeking viscious petty revenge on each other by making them watch them fucking someone else.

It would be sad if it was just them. But with 5 kids 6 to 16 it's depraved. There's no way the Marriage survives. And the divorce will be just as brutal and evil as Nick's other legal endeavors, such as the Monty case.

The Youtube/Twitch streamer to Cow pipeline is an efficient and unforgiving factory.
 
I hope (THIS IS A JOKE AND NOT A LEGAL STATEMENT) becomes a Rekieta-ism like that one copy and pasted message Patrick S Tomlinson sends everyone who texts him. Nick should also probably use that disclaimer whenever he says he loves his kids, just to be safe.
i'm baffled just thinking about what that caveat implies or is trying to do. i mean, for one thing, what in the fuck is a "legal statement"? it could be interpreted as a statement that one is legally allowed to make (as opposed to, e.g., an illegal statement); it could be a statement in the context of a law, or it could be---and i guess this is what he means---a statement that someone might interpret in a legal context. the big brain lawyer move i guess is to clarify that the statement is in fact a joke rather than a statement that might be used against him during his case. but like, if he takes things seriously enough to put that caveat anyway, then he would be serious enough to shut the fuck up. but if he's not seriously claiming that the statement is a joke, then the caveat is itself a joke, which in turn demonstrates his contempt for the whole process. i'm dizzy just thinking about how retarded he is.
 
Back