Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 19.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 89 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 16.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 118 36.1%

  • Total voters
    327
oh shit I didn’t think nick had it in him but he’s gonna go with the “she has to recuse herself because I talked shit about her pussy liquor” route. Godspeed nick hope you had a nice line or two when you came up with this
seems like you have the right to pull a new judge before they hear your case. the first one is free. the second would require cause.
 
Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher.
View attachment 6050080
View attachment 6050081

Credit to @Useful_Mistake for posting these documents in the State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta thread.
This makes sense. Nick clearly said he is trying to remove alcohol as a theme on his streams, and it would be nigh impossible to do that if the judge for his trial, a trial which should be a massive stream money maker, has liquor leaking out of her vagina.
 
He thinks that lawyering in public chats and social media will win him favor, but in reality it just shows that he's a disingenuous snake.
I'd been ignoring Rackets in my YouTube subs for the longest time just cos his post Rittenhouse stuff got boring quick. Once he copped his ban for the "MAPs belong on the wall" I unsubbed shortly after because of how he continued to act like everyone was simply misinterpreted his joke - slimy cunt.
Shivering Butt Weasel it’s a weasel that lives in shit.
Nick definitely evokes a lot of weasel comparisons from me. Coming soon to NickToons: "Rage Pig and Coke Weasel".
 
NOOOOOO YOU CAN’T JUST LET YOUR CHILDREN GO HUNGRY BECAUSE… BECAUSE YOU JUST CANT, OKAY!!??
IMG_6848.jpeg
-based Kiwis
 
Nick and the judge do have a past history beyond those comments though. I don't think it's unreasonable to request a recusal. The thing is it's a small town with only like three judges so chances are they all have a history with him.

I mean hey I don't think this is gonna help him or anything but I don't think judge fischer has it out for nick and I have zero doubt nick has just as much "history" with the other judges simply because of his compulsion to be a seedy lying asshole to everyone he meets.

If anything I would not be shocked if fischer turned out to be the most sympathetic to him because she's familiar with him and nick is shooting himself in the foot asking for another judge.
 
(IANAL) wouldn’t they have to hold a hearing where Nick would present information about why he wants the judge dismissed?
doesn't seem like it. subsequent attempts to remove would require proof of misconduct, but the first is a matter of right.
(4) Notice to Remove. A party may remove a judge assigned to preside at a trial or hearing as follows:

(a) A notice to remove must be served on the opposing counsel and filed with district court within seven days after the party receives notice of the name of the presiding judge at the trial or hearing;

(b) The notice must be filed before the start of the trial or hearing; and

(c) The notice is not effective against a judge who already presided at the trial, Omnibus Hearing, or evidentiary hearing if the removing party had notice the judge would preside at the hearing.
(5) After a party removes a judge under paragraph (4) that party may remove a subsequent judge only for cause.
 
Last edited:
This was an interesting post about Kayla's situation, since the thread is going there now. If these really are long running issues it doesn't sound like a great environment for the kids to have grown up in, having a long term sick parent (or some kind of munchie, the children won't understand the difference) is very stressful in a lot of ways.
Thanks a lot for referencing that breakdown. Fantastic post.
 
Cocaine, Meth and getting pounded in the ass by Jamacian Niggers has that effect.


As it is always said, there is a difference between Legal Immigrants and Illegal Ones, you are probably dealing with Legal ones.
You know I can't believe I'm saying this, but no. I meant BEFORE any of the drugs. Looking at their wedding photos is really astounding. Kayla looks closer to how she did now compared to when we first saw her. If I channel my inner gooner hard enough, I almost sort of understand Nick's "her body is ruined" comments. Kayla's wedding photos and her first appearance on stream almost look like two completely different women. I wouldn't recognize either of them unless you told me. Not that Kayla was ugly when we were first introduced to her but she's definitely vastly different from the woman he married. Then if you look at Nick, holy fuck what a vast improvement. He went from a coomer tier looking NEET to looking like an actual human being. I can see from a weird sexual deviant's point of view why Nick might have thought that way. He was a coomer loser 4-6 at best who got with an 8-9. Mind you, after 5 kids its a miracle she looks as good as she does. But I kind of see why when he's a few shots deep he might say those disgusting comments. It doesn't make him not an ass hole, he's a dick, but when you look at 2021 Nick and Kayla and wedding night Nick and Kayla, it's 4 different people.

On a side note this gives a lot more credence to the Nick badgering her about her appearance notion.
 
Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher.
1717424763951.png
1717424795086.png

0% chance.

doesn't seem like it. subsequent attempts to remove would require proof of misconduct, but the first is a matter of right.
Wow. Despite the above, I find it hard to believe. Idiots being able to do this for no reason seems like a good way for them to clog up the court system with nonsense.
 
Back