- Joined
- May 4, 2020
As per what I was told, the bond was still being worked on 13 mins ago. Guess they finally finished it upDocument hasn’t been uploaded yet but looks like Kayla’s bond has indeed been paid.
View attachment 6050217
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As per what I was told, the bond was still being worked on 13 mins ago. Guess they finally finished it upDocument hasn’t been uploaded yet but looks like Kayla’s bond has indeed been paid.
View attachment 6050217
On one hand, this is the least funny outcome. I was hoping the alcohol pussy juice clip would be shown in court but oh well.The notice was granted based on the timely fillings from both Nick and Kayla from my understanding. (If there is an error in my post feel free to correct me).
Document hasn’t been uploaded yet but looks like Kayla’s bond has indeed been paid.
View attachment 6050217
Also, new judge
View attachment 6050221
View attachment 6050195
View attachment 6050198
The request for removal was granted based on the timely fillings from both Nick and Kayla from my understanding. (If there is an error in my post feel free to correct me).
It should be Kandiyohi County (first image) because Nick lives nowhere near Anoka County.
View attachment 6050207View attachment 6050206
Pretty clear Nick copied the motion from somewhere and failed to change the name of the county or the Judicial District (it says 10th, corresponding to Anoka, but should be Eighth, corresponding to Kandiyohi)
In any case, it obviates any doubt that Nick prepared the motion for himself and Kayla even though they are purportedly both "pro se".
was paid for it on 28th same day as nicksView attachment 6050234
it's up now and has indeed been paid. guess they just needed time to get the money together.
The document clearly says that it was paid on the 28th, so it was already paid last week and this was actually an error that it wasn't submitted yetView attachment 6050234
it's up now and has indeed been paid. guess they just needed time to get the money together.
yep. fixed my post above. let this be a lesson to all those looking to latch onto any minute discrepancy in this process: sometimes, the legal system is slow, imprecise, borderline incompetent, and not at all the work of a grand conspiracy or deeper meaning. the fanfiction that went on when nick's bail was posted but not kayla's has been a bit embarrassing ngl (and i participated in it).The document clearly says that it was paid on the 28th, so it was already paid last week and this was actually an error that it wasn't submitted yet
My recollection is that it said "more than that day" which could just mean the kid had slept in them, woke up, and wanted to change. Hence my question about which kid it was. One of the kids was woken up and then immediately walked out of the house by an officer. If that kid asked later to change out of what they'd slept in, I'd find that pretty unremarkable.
I'm trying to figure out what objective evidence we actually have, as opposed to a bunch of subjective evidence provided by a handful of people from Nick's church who asked to remain anonymous. I'm sure CPS will do their own investigation to determine whether there's truth to the claim, but that won't be released to the public.
If you were some black trashy punk? No. If you are a lawyer whose trashing the judge you had previous beef with led to the very raid (didn’t she sign the warrant?)So just so I understand:
The judge hasn’t said anything about Nick and has not shown any signs of bias…. The only issue is what Nick said?
Under that logic doesn’t that mean I could have ANY AND EVERY judge removed from my case as long as I trash talk them online?
not the same judge. hearing judge was "Rodney Hanson" sorry for misinfo. i corrected the above post.So they got the judge that didn't immediately go "no you can't represent the co-defendant you dumbass".
I disbelieve pretty much literally everyone. I'm looking forward to when we're able to at least get the bodycam footage and see for ourselves what happened.To play devil's advocate for two seconds, we don't have that much objective evidence, especially if you don't consider what is written in the police report to qualify as objective evidence. However, what has been the trend with Rackets? Has it generally been the case that he downplays things and then when we get more information, it turns out he was correct and they really weren't as bad as we thought? Or has it generally been the opposite, that when we get more information, it turns out things are way worse than they looked on the surface?
It's been the latter. Every single time. So my bet is that if/when we get more info about the state of Rekieta's kids leading up to the arrest, it won't be pretty.
Smacks of being desperate. What other defence can there be except everyone’s bias and it’s all a conspiracy. X to doubt any other judge would look at this case through that lens.He really is doing the Beard strategy, let's see how it plays out!
I think he's patting himself on the back, but I also think he just majorly fucked up.
I doubt another judge will rule materially differently in this case, and a judge who doesn't like you can be better than one that doesn't care about you - if they're a good judge overall. Because they will KNOW they don't like you and often fight against it (see also: judges allowing basically any non-material motion from defendants that are going to lose).
However, he just removed a powerful appeals line (even if bullshit).
It's like how in jury selection each side can just dismiss with no reason a few jurors - you get to remove ONE judge once for no reason stated (of course, the entire police and court system inAnokaKing Candy County is laughing their ass off as to the reason.
Nick's problem is he thinks everyone is like him, if he were judge over the liquorsupplylady he'd be vindictive as fuck.