Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Boingboingboingboi]

You need to lurk more or you would see parallels with Ty Beard.

Filing at the absolute last minute with document errors is not a wise course of action. Or are you telling me that procrastinating is a good strategy?

I was one who would constantly submit college papers at the last minute, Nick is playing a foolish game of brinkmanship with himself with court documents.

i mean, it's the first filing, and it really doesn't matter. for all we (or nick) knows, judge fischer would have been better than the current guy. i'm really not reading too much into this late filing. he made it, and got the judge changed. nothing else really matters, and even changing the judge might not matter.

the few screenshots we have of longer posts hes made on locals show a few spelling and grammatical errors, but otherwise yes, youre right. We dont *know* hes been drinking because we're not standing over his shoulder watching him. We can make the inference that he is, because hes an addict that is so far unrepentant about his actions. Considering hes a lawyer he should know that anything he puts out on social media CAN and WILL be used against him in a court of law, especially if he makes a statement about the facts of a case (he made several about the firearms in his house). He must know this considering the police basically admitted they were watching his online activity. If he were just radio silent I would have more hope hes cleaning up his act, but rather than being repentant hes actively making an ass of himself on the online. He also made a statement that he didnt dump all his booze and gave it to "a good home". Yeah, right. An alcy dumping booze is no indicator he'll get clean, but giving it away? Come on now. From what I remember, addicts are notorious in their generosity, especially when youve spent a year and change in a bottle.

spelling errors are indeed somewhat decent evidence of intoxication. i'll grant that.

also there are 2 different things you might be conflating. i'm not saying that he's sober and cleaning up his act or being repentant. of course he isn't doing the second thing. but i would absolutely believe that he is being spitefully sober while planning his grand (and sober; no more alcohol theme) return to prove all the haters wrong. it's called being "dry drunk", where you cut out the alcohol but leave all the other toxic traits that lead you to alcoholism untouched. he will very likely relapse. it's just a matter of time. but i think it's just as likely as him continuing to drink.

 

[RodgerDodger]

It really shouldn't be a thing that you can preemptively insult every judge in your county or state, and then scream about them having potential biases against you for your own actions.

Most courts give you one freebie no questions asked. Provided it is used very early before anything starts getting heard.

And there is just enough prior history between Nick and Fischet that swapping the Judge out is probably a good thing. As it might have left Nick an appellate issue to rant and rage about.

The stupid thing is I can't see either of the male judges reacting any better to Nick's "Pussy Liquor" rants than Fischer would. If anything they may be more outraged and protective of their colleague. But it will be less overt and not show up in the record. By all observations Fischer had no issues with Nick. In fact in one case when she made a judicial error (which he ranted about online, not to her) she went back. Researched the issue and corrected the mistake. So she shows no bias. He is the raving lunatic. Keeping her might have preserved an issue should things go against him. But he has no basis for challenging the male Judges on bias. Even though they will clearly view him as the unhinged asshole That he in fact is.

I can escape the thought that this is less a legal strategy and more yet another example of Nick seeking to exercise some domination over a perceived enemy (or a woman). An "I had that bitch tossed off my case" moment to own everybody.

 

[DumbDude43]

Whether or not it's her fault, the fact that there's a chance she could make biased decisions based on her personal feelings makes sense to me. Why isn't Balldo right in this case?

if this was a valid argument then people could just talk random shit about their judge to get them removed and delay a decision indefinitely.

 

[Gorton Colu]

Whether or not it's her fault, the fact that there's a chance she could make biased decisions based on her personal feelings makes sense to me. Why isn't Balldo right in this case?

Because being right in this case is pointless. Nick is well known in the community. It's a very small town, so all three of the judges could be biased.

 

[Strix454]

I'm curious if any of these judges communicate with each other unofficially.....

Three judges in one courthouse in a small rural county? Its not that they unofficially speak to each other. Its that the business of the small town elite in a place like that is to be in everyone elses business all the time. Rich guy local attorney gets busted with big amount of coke, guns under the bed and has his kids taken away from him after his church rats him out? Everyone of a certain status in the entire county is going to be talking about it and gossiping about it.

The thing about living in a place like that is that there is no where to hide.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Three judges in one courthouse in a small rural county? Its not that they unofficially speak to each other. Its that the business of the small town elite in a place like that is to be in everyone elses business all the time. Rich guy local attorney gets busted with big amount of coke, guns under the bed and has his kids taken away from him after his church rats him out? Everyone of a certain status in the entire county is going to be talking about it and gossiping about it.

The thing about living in a place like that is that there is no where to hide.

That's why I wouldn't be shocked if his next filing is for a change of venue, saying he wouldn't be able to get a fair and unbiased trial in his county because of his notoriety.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Whether or not it's her fault, the fact that there's a chance she could make biased decisions based on her personal feelings makes sense to me. Why isn't Balldo right in this case?

because that's silly. Balldo could then just make similar statements about every judge and then he's unabled to be prosecuted forever as every single judge in the world could be at risk for making decisions based on "personal feelings"

why is it the judge's problem that balldo is just an asshole to everyone?

 

[Stupor Mario]

And there is just enough prior history between Nick and Fischet that swapping the Judge out is probably a good thing. As it might have left Nick an appellate issue to rant and rage about.

As funny as it would have been for Fischer to have been the presiding judge, this is why I'm glad this happened. It eliminates those grounds for appeal based on personal animus.

 

[Evilronald]

Is this any indication that he'll actually go forwards and try to contest the charges instead of taking a plea deal? Or is removing thr judge also helpful for his plead deal too?

I think that a lot of the calculation the prosecutors make on any deal is how likely they are to win at trial and how the judge might sentence if convicted. A harsher judge who is more prosecution friendly would mean the prosecutor would come with a worse deal than a judge who is more pro defense and lighter in sentencing.

 

[Gorton Colu]

i mean, it's the first filing, and it really doesn't matter. for all we (or nick) knows, judge fischer would have been better than the current guy. i'm really not reading too much into this late filing. he made it, and got the judge changed. nothing else really matters, and even changing the judge might not matter.

You're changing goal posts. I'm not arguing with you the merits of Nick filing or not filing. I am contending that he is not making the smartest decisions. One possibility for that being that he is still hitting the hooch.

You were arguing that we can't know that he is not drinking which is a useless argument imo.

As far as I'm aware, no one is claiming clairvoyance in order to state that he is drinking definitively. Otherwise it's axiomatic and obvious that no one here knows for sure that he is. Again, a useless position to take and quibble on.

 

[NotADrunkLawyer]

because that's silly. Balldo could then just make similar statements about every judge and then he's unabled to be prosecuted forever as every single judge in the world could be at risk for making decisions based on "personal feelings"

why is it the judge's problem that balldo is just an asshole to everyone?

Every judge in the world has liquor flowing out of their vaginas and/or penises.

Now if you don’t mind I’m gonna go rob a few banks because there are no judges who can oversee my case.

 

[Turbo Hornbag Hervez]

View attachment 6050215
View attachment 6050216
The request for removal was granted based on the timely fillings from both Nick and Kayla from my understanding. (If there is an error in my post feel free to correct me).

She probably wants nothing to do with this faggot

 

[Stupor Mario]

That's why I wouldn't be shocked if his next filing is for a change of venue, saying he wouldn't be able to get a fair and unbiased trial in his county because of his notoriety.

Is that something that has a real chance of being granted if Nick requests it? If so, what are the rules about relocating his trial? Could he get his case handled by some godless liberal judge in the Minneapolis area?

 

[kokokrunch123]

I'm curious if any of these judges communicate with each other unofficially.....

they're part of the same integrated bar. once you become a lawyer, you meet (or will meet) the other lawyers and judges in the jurisdiction where you choose to practice. and if you get higher up in public service, you get to meet associate justices, justices, etc.

for their local judicial body, they will inevitably meet, communicate, work with, judge, or be opposing counsel to each other.
and if they aren't robotic professionals (this is normally the case), then they'll interact even beyond the workplace.

 

[borsabil]

i don't see any evidence that he's drinking, and, tbh, aside from running his mouth on twitter, i don't see any evidence of poor decisionmaking since his release. i get that it's fun to assume the worst based on limited evidence but we really have no idea whats going on at that house or between his ears

The balldo has been a sozzled drunkard for years and has been a full blown alcoholic for at least 2. Full blown alcies can't just stop drinking without close medical supervision and treatment. Oral diazepam for the shakes, laxatives to prevent bowel obstruction, IV vitamin drips etc. He has refused rehab because he thinks it's a 'bad look', he opted for cash bail to avoid piss and breath tests, he continues to deny he has an addiction to either drugs or alcohol. Of course he's still drinking, stop sweeping for him.

 

[Hee]

Nick dismissed a judge he shit-talked with transparently sleazy tactics, and ends up getting a judge that is both a supporter to youth groups and has a history of going hard on drug involved criminals. Nick is the embodiment of this image:

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Kayla's bond documents have been posted:
View attachment 6050319
View attachment 6050320
View attachment 6050322
First document

View attachment 6050324
Bond receipt

Kiwi Farms: Felted
Scandinavian Incels: Pruded
Rekieta: Vindicated

 

[kokokrunch123]

That would be highly unethical. (and I do mean that in all sincerity).

collusion would be unethical. chatting up your fellow integrated bar buddies, golf mates, etc., is normal.
source: went to law school, joined a law-based fraternity, yada-yada

 

[Boingboingboingboi]

You're changing goal posts. I'm not arguing with you the merits of Nick filing or not filing. I am contending that he is not making the smartest decisions. One possibility for that being that he is still hitting the hooch.

You were arguing that we can't know that he is not drinking which is a useless argument imo.

As far as I'm aware, no one is claiming clairvoyance in order to state that he is drinking definitively. Otherwise it's axiomatic and obvious that no one here knows for sure that he is. Again, a useless position to take and quibble on.

plenty of people are asserting with confidence that he is drinking and they claim his behavior can only be explained by drinking, or that he is such an alcoholic that he would be dead if he wasn't drinking right now. i'm just saying that his being drunk is not necessary to explain his behavior, and that it is not inevitable that he must be drinking right now or else he would be dead.

i also uncarefully said that he is not making any poor decisions. that was wrong; i will happily grant that he's making poor decisions. i simply don't see enough evidence that is better explained by intoxication than by his other well-known personality defects. again, to me, it's 50-50 until he shows up on stream with glass-in-hand.

 

[anionfarflung]

If you're not nick himself you should probably reexamine your life if this is what you're reduced to.

But if you are Nick don't bother reexamining your life.