2D (drawn) porn is more respectable than 3d (real) porn

Basically, anime girls (or other fictional women) are imperfect depictions of someone's ideal or perfect woman. They are platonic women, in that sense. Not all of them ofcourse, some fictional characters are designed to be imperfect, afterall. But many are also idealistic or depicting something that the author thinks is perfect.
Though you’re the definition of a psued, think about what you could’ve done with your time instead of writing this bullshit out. Think about what you could be doing if you weren’t wanking so much either
Also, the will of the individual organisms is irrelevant, natural selection happens on its own. The life forms that are more fit to survive, because of their specific genetic makeup, do.
Interesting fact: 2d girls aren’t a lifeform. You can’t start families or even get physically intimate with them so what the fuck are you really doing? Jacking it to a hypersexual fantasy?
 
Last edited:
This could have been an interesting thread. If the OP weren't an anime pfp, that is

What does that mean?
Finally, my two weeks long account can call somebody a newfag, we started this day with the right foot

Eitherway, i don't value something that came about due to chance
All that exists came due to chance, unless you are religious, which means that you are going to Hell due to your repeated and unrepentant defense of sexual immorality
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sheogorath
You are contradicting yourself,
Im not. I value intelligent design and effort. Creating art takes effort, a woman taking a picture of herself doesn't.
Simple as that.
2D can be made completely independent of foids, automatically making it superior
Yep, especially if you take measures to make the art distinct from real life. Like in the case of anime, futa, or furry art.
Men need to stop obsessing over women just because they exist.
futa = tranny
Kill yourself you pathetic trannycock chasing mongrel.
Futas are women that naturally have dicks because of a genetic condition. Generally they have both male and female genitals.
 
This could have been an interesting thread. If the OP weren't an anime pfp, that is
You have an anime pfp. Also why would any other type of person make a thread like this? It is primarily weebs that consume pornographic art.
All that exists came due to chance
Sure, but i still value intelligent design / effort over a thot simply taking a picture of herself. The chance of artificial art existing is less than living things existing. Since it requires that the species in question be intelligent and also possess fingers or something similar.

I'm gonna ask the stupid and obvious question, but why are you sharing your gooning habits with an Internet bullying forum?
More like a gossip forum really. You fags have not been very successful at bullying me so far.
 
You have an anime pfp. Also why would any other type of person make a thread like this? It is primarily weebs that consume pornographic art.
Yes, but I'm not the OP. And somebody like @Lidl Drip could have made a thread about it, she's very big into women's rights and all of that, and a pick your poison with her could have been interesting. Also, stop calling it "art", it has no value, nor meaning, nor significance beyond the most basic and animalistic instinctual reaction, it is a drawing, but not art.

Sure, but i still value intelligent design / effort over a thot simply taking a picture of herself. The chance of artificial art existing is less than living things existing. Since it requires that the species in question be intelligent and also possess fingers or something similar.
If pornography is "art", then you can create "art" without being an intelligent species, because what your example is a thing that only exists to evoke a base instinct.

More like a gossip forum really. You fags have not been very successful at bullying me so far.
Just look up the animal control board if you want to see how bad things can get with your kind of posters, besides, one of the lolcows forum rules that you always see on the bottom of every page is that we are not the autistic illuminati, because even the most normal guy can become a lolcow if you have thousends of autists harassing them
 
Im not. I value intelligent design and effort. Creating art takes effort, a woman taking a picture of herself doesn't.
Simple as that.
Why doesn't it take effort? Are you one of those hipsters that think that painting is art but photography is not? Do you come from the 1830s?

Futas are women that naturally have dicks because of a genetic condition. Generally they have both male and female genitals.
Chaser. And you are also thinking of an hermaphrodite, which is not at all what you are talking about
 
Last edited:
OP, when was the last time you saw another human being naked in person?
 
Op all your essays are dumb and gay. Take some average people, show them some normal porn. Their reactions will probably range from shrugging to a bit upset. Show them some of your gay anime dick girl cartoon porn shit and their reactions will all universally likely be confusion, disgust, revulsion and whatever opinion they had of you will go down. It doesn't matter whatever cope you come up with to justify your cartoon porn fetish to yourself, it's weird and degenerate and nobody will ever accept it as normal or respectable
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Toji Suzuhara
All porn is bad. Porn addiction is a bad thing and there’s no good reason for porn to exist.
JPEG image.jpeg
 
False equivalence. Jerking off is not as gross as eating poop, thats retarded. Im pretty sure most young men jerk off.
Nigger you are autistic only an Autist would think this means anything at all

I also kind of do this. I say gross in my head whenever i see a real woman. But his perspective (the non consensual angle) is also interesting.
Are you gay this sound like something someone who is homosexual would do?
 
Also, stop calling it "art", it has no value, nor meaning, nor significance beyond the most basic and animalistic instinctual reaction, it is a drawing, but not art.
Art, the way the term is actually used in human language, means a human creative work of some sort. Drawings, music, stories, movies, etc are all art, even if they don't have an "value". Also, value is a subjective thing.
If pornography is "art", then you can create "art" without being an intelligent species
Nope, drawings require intelligence and skill.
Shaking your ass on tiktok though requires neither.
Why doesn't it take effort?
Snapping a picture of yourself using your phone takes such a minimal amount of effort, and skill, that i don't value it.
Its nothing compared to the difficulty of actually drawing a picture. Especially a good picture.
The vast majority of porn is low effort, and even the professionally filmed stuff does not take as much skill to create as a drawing of equivalent quality. At the end of the day, using a camera to do things for you is not going to be as skill intensive as drawing.
Also, i personally don't consider photography to be art, (and most people probably don't) but that is not even relevant to this discussion. Drawing will always take more skill than photography when it comes to porn.
And you are also thinking of an hermaphrodite
Futas are basically hermaphrodites. Women that naturally have dicks.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Eadred
Op all your essays are dumb and gay. Take some average people, show them some normal porn. Their reactions will probably range from shrugging to a bit upset. Show them some of your gay anime dick girl cartoon porn shit and their reactions will all universally likely be confusion, disgust, revulsion and whatever opinion they had of you will go down. It doesn't matter whatever cope you come up with to justify your cartoon porn fetish to yourself, it's weird and degenerate and nobody will ever accept it as normal or respectable
If i show average people a normal porn video, and then show them a well drawn, artistic picture of a nude woman (not the futa shit because obviously thats more of a fetish that i have), then they will most likely agree with me that the drawing/picture took more effort to create, and that the skill of the artist is more worthy of respect than the woman simply recording herself.
If they don't agree then they would simply be illogical.
Drawing a picture factually requires more effort than just recording yourself.
OP, when was the last time you saw another human being naked in person?
Im a virgin, friend.
 
Because you lack self awareness about it. But if you consider that a blessing, so be it.
can you show me examples of this so called bullying?
I mean what can you do at the end of the day?
Call me an incel? I already call myself that.
 
Futas are women that naturally have dicks because of a genetic condition. Generally they have both male and female genitals.
The genetic condition you are describing is Intersex, of which there are several varieties. Futa is a term exclusively used to describe pornography, fetishizing people with this genetic condition (and thereby misrepresenting them).
they will most likely agree with me that the drawing/picture took more effort to create
If your main argument is about effort, then by that logic, the huge porn studios that have a whole crew with production, editing, cameramen, set design, and most of the stuff that goes into making a movie would be more respectable than the porn made with little effort and artistic flair.

Respectability is subjective. But if your objective standard of respectability is determined by how many hours of labor it takes to create a piece of porn, then the porn with the greatest budget and longest development time would be the most respectable in your point of view.

TLDR: Your logic is flawed, make a better argument.
 
Back