- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
Whatever the current game is usually gets implemented into Warzone around the time it enters Season 1.Are they going to implement the omnimovement system into Warzone? I imagine that will throw a lot of people off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever the current game is usually gets implemented into Warzone around the time it enters Season 1.Are they going to implement the omnimovement system into Warzone? I imagine that will throw a lot of people off.
These fuckers want mass shootings. Whoever came up with this needs to be fired and investigated by police. Tranny demons are dangerous!
Needs moar Roof KoreanView attachment 6074506
This picture looks like a reference to the 1992 Rodney King riots lmfao.
It's the same garbage as before, but the servers are shitting themselves so bad that it's hard to find a match(that and because the game has been dead for months population wise). There is nothing new under the sun, other than new crossovers and new paypiggy bundles. COD is now Fortnite for adults/manchildren, so this is expected in it's future. Don't worry, even if BO6 will look grounded at launch, give it a few months and the deluge of cringy 90s action movie heroes and edgy skins will be back to ruin the visual style of the game(not to mention the inevitable crossovers with the relevant/popular thing and anime).Speaking of the "current game"; how's MWIII really playing these days? I haven't touched the game in over a month at this point, so I'm a bit behind on how it's going. Is it still a buggy mess?
I don't want to go to bat for Activision or really any corporation, but with Xdefiant I'm just ughhhhh. I refuse to engage with Ubisoft at all due to their "players should get comfortable with not owning games" bullshit they pulled recently, no matter how good (or free-to-play) Xdefiant might be.While it is true Ubisoft will eventually ruin it, XDefiant is not just a competitor but a successor to COD multiplayer. Every new entry sees less and less players, more hackers, more sweats, and more ridiculous ways to bleed your cash while content gets worse every year. XDefiant plays like an oldschool COD game, and that's what's going to bring over all the people who have left the franchise. This alone will keep it relevant for a few years, especially if BO6 bombs.
They cut them from the game for being too OP.Needs moar Roof Korean
Plot twist, the Koreans instigated the riots in that reality.View attachment 6074506
This picture looks like a reference to the 1992 Rodney King riots lmfao.
The Ghost of Eight.any recommendations on COD content creators to watch on Youtube that aren't cringe?
Depends on what you're looking for.any recommendations on COD content creators to watch on Youtube that aren't cringe?
I don't want to go to bat for Activision or really any corporation, but with Xdefiant I'm just ughhhhh. I refuse to engage with Ubisoft at all due to their "players should get comfortable with not owning games" bullshit they pulled recently, no matter how good (or free-to-play) Xdefiant might be.
Oh, Ubisoft will absolutely ruin the game. This is why I am telling people to play it now, while the honeymoon is still in full effect. XDefiant is a temporary boon, sooner or later it will be fucked over just like Siege and other Ubisoft properties, so you might as well try it out now and then drop it when that happens. It helps that the game is free and relatively small by today's bloated standards. COD, on the other hand, is guaranteed to be garbage, it will be 80$ on launch(HAHAHAHA) and is 10 times larger than XDefiant, not to mention the server quality and population aren't what they used to be. As of right now, it's a no-brainer which game to play, but that might change over time.I don't want to go to bat for Activision or really any corporation, but with Xdefiant I'm just ughhhhh. I refuse to engage with Ubisoft at all due to their "players should get comfortable with not owning games" bullshit they pulled recently, no matter how good (or free-to-play) Xdefiant might be.
The 300+ GB likely relates to the entirety of COD HQ, including MWII and MWIII. If you already have CoD HQ installed (which is pretty big to be fair), MWII itself is 75 GBs, while MWIII is roughly 68 GBs. While excessive hype's definitely not good, falling for ragebait isn't really the best either.At this point, I am strongly starting to doubt I will even download it if it has Tranzit in it, 300GB + biweekly 90GB updates simply aren't fucking worth it.
Let's not forget the constant updates the game will have. XDefiant right now is about 40GBs, and while it will no doubt get bigger with time, it's more what I would expect from this kind of game. COD has been doing this for years, trying to monopolize your hard drive space so you don't play other games, since in their eyes every moment you play another game is a moment where you're not engaging with their services or content, and that's a moment where you're not giving them money. This is intentional.The 300+ GB likely relates to the entirety of COD HQ, including MWII and MWIII. If you already have CoD HQ installed (which is pretty big to be fair), MWII itself is 75 GBs, while MWIII is roughly 68 GBs.
Modern Warfare II is already in a post-support state past all of its regular updates, 75 GBs is what it is after all of those updates. Zombies being an optional module tends to be spotty overall, but fairly consistent for Treyarch titles. It's not optional for Vanguard or MWIII, but it is for ex. Cold War.Let's not forget the constant updates the game will have. XDefiant right now is about 40GBs, and while it will no doubt get bigger with time, it's more what I would expect from this kind of game. COD has been doing this for years, trying to monopolize your hard drive space so you don't play other games, since in their eyes every moment you play another game is a moment where you're not engaging with their services or content, and that's a moment where you're not giving them money. This is intentional.
I don't know if Zombies is a module you can uninstall, I have not played these games in forever, but if it isn't then the size will balloon up even more with every new map they release. Then again, that might also be the only worthwhile part of the game, it wouldn't be the first time.
MWII/III are something of an anomaly since this is a game split in half, with it's mid season DLC sold for 70$ as a separate game. This is the only reason they had carry forward for their skins. Zombies in Vanguard was barely an afterthought and Activision knew it was going to bomb, so they didn't want to give people an option to disable it. That would make the game look even worse than it did. Hard to tell what they're gonna do with BO6, this franchise has always been schizophrenic and bipolar in it's every aspect, thanks to Activision milking it as much as they can.Modern Warfare II is already in a post-support state past all of its regular updates, 75 GBs is what it is after all of those updates. Zombies being an optional module tends to be spotty overall, but fairly consistent for Treyarch titles. It's not optional for Vanguard or MWIII, but it is for ex. Cold War.
Idk, I haven't played any multiplayer COD since OG MW3 and I recently bought Cold War on sale for 20 bux and I've been having quite a lot of fun with it (altho the SMG meta is absolute cancer and recently I've been put into more and more sweaty matches with my average kd steadily declining)not to mention the server quality and population aren't what they used to be. As of right now, it's a no-brainer which game to play, but that might change over time.