Hobbes and Tony have a very similar approach to "the science."
This is so embarrassing. It actually makes me feel bad for the guy. So confident in his wrongheadedness and complete misunderstanding. The fact that "trans kids" celebrities like Susie Green retweeted his claim that he reproduced "the Cass Review" is quite delicious though, as it proves that she doesn't understand the Cass Review in the slightest.
"What do you mean?" you ask. "Why do men and women need different backpacks?"
Video from the above product page has a helpful video to explain
Of course the real reason we're told that some products need to be designed differently for men and women is so they can retail the latter at double the price.
That is an autstic man with personal hygeine issues Snaggle Tooth
This article was fucking insane. The pictures are
really something.
Elected in 2022, in her first session in office, Zephyr, a Democrat, caught notice for the simple act of representing her constituents. Last spring, she advocated against
Senate Bill 99, a disastrous piece of legislation banning
gender-affirming medical and surgical care for children. On the state house floor, Zephyr was
denied the chance to speak. Later on, a protest erupted and she held her mic up in defiance and subsequently
was formally censured by her Republican colleagues. She spent the rest of the session away from the legislative floor, doing what work she could do online from a
bench in the same building. (The bill passed and was signed into law by Montana’s Republican governor Greg Gianforte, but was temporarily
blocked by the courts for violating the right to privacy enshrined in the state's constitution.)
"Zephyr [...] caught notice for the simple act of representing her constituents." That isn't quite what happened, is it, Teen Vogue? He was censured for telling his Republican colleagues that they were murderers who had "blood on their hands," violating the House's rules on decorum (a troon being indecorous? Hard to believe, I know, but true nonetheless).
In her award acceptance speech, she mentioned “the ongoing genocide in Gaza.” She spoke about the hope for peace and a recent reconciliation dinner she had with her parents. “I think about the way peace requires us to commune with people who hold antithetical beliefs to us in kind, genuine, and delicate ways.” She told us that she tries to approach every conversation with three things in mind: “First of which is that the person I'm talking to came to their beliefs genuinely. The second is that they hold beliefs that were nuanced. And the third is that they are willing to change their mind under the right circumstances. That is not true of everyone. That is particularly not true of everyone in politics. But I believe that about my opinions.”
This is so naive it is laughable. Isn't there a "trans genocide" occurring right now, Zac? If there were, you would know that "communing with" people who want you dead is just not possible, and that that is why wars happen (cue Schmittian definition of politics here).
The writing is about what you'd expect from Teen Vogue:
That isn't to say life isn't without challenges.
Are you sure this is what you mean to say, Grace Byron? Something isn't quite right here. When you use a double negative in English, you end up saying the opposite of what you mean.
"the pilgrimage to meet Zephyr." Lol. Lmao, even.
Zephyr was in the middle of planning a wedding when I arrived. One afternoon she swung from a discussion about Palestine to a meeting about wedding china. When I spoke about Zephyr to friends, inevitably some knew about the powerhouse political couple’s other half, Erin Reed, a journalist and trans woman with a large following on X who reports on anti-trans politics, rhetoric, and violence. They are, without a doubt, lesbian T4T royalty.
The couple originally met while working on similar issues. One day Reed asked Zephyr how her weekend was. “Then she did a little hair brush behind her ear and I realized, she likes me.” Zephyr met Reed’s son and the two embarked on a long-distance relationship. Later, she whispered “I’m going to marry you someday,” into Reed’s ear while Sam Smith sang at the Respect for Marriage Act signing. “She has a deep, deep, deep kindness and a drive to follow the things that she loves,” Zephyr says of Reed. The two shared frequent calls and check-ins during the weekend I spent with the legislator. Zephyr often cooed encouraging words to her son.
This is a pattern now with these articles about Zac: the journalist notes that Tony makes frequent phone calls during the interviews. No doubt pestering Zac to make sure that their "relationship" gets mentioned.
The photos:
Look at the shape of his torso and the forms of his chest! Whoever picked these dresses for Zac must be a closet TERF, because Jesus Christ it could not be clearer that we are looking at a male. There is also something about the shape of the neck and the straps on the second one that just accentuates the mannish chest to an extreme degree. And his arm movements make him look like a simpleton. Again, even his movements give his sex away.
Imagine being related to this muppet and seeing these pictures. The fucking shame.
This person,
did more work than anyone on this article - even more than the author of the text. Check it out:
He looks very much like Kris Tyson in this last one (I think it's something to do with the hairstyle and the lipstick colour, although the male phenotype plays a big part of course). There is SO much photoshopping going on with Zac's face (look at that first one!) that I don't think even a single one of the flesh-coloured pixels is actually his skin. I wonder if the graphics departments at these magazines have a whole set of heavy-duty Photoshop maneouvers and extreme filters that they only bring out for use on troons. Wouldn't surprise me.
More of Tony's bizarre fantasies about the evidence for troonery.
This fucking retard thinks that just because the rest of the Anglosphere hasn't immediately put the Cass Review's findings into law, it's "struggling"?
Tony is overjoyed that Canada, Australia and New Zealand didn't accept the Cass Review
Other than being the White (British-) Commonwealth, what would be the unifying cultural or political factors to make them collectively reject Cass?
The main reason the Cass Review hasn't had "impact" outside the UK is because it was a review of NHS (i.e., English) service provision to English (public, on the NHS) patients, commissioned
by the NHS - it simply doesn't apply to Canada or Australia, or anywhere else outside England. The parts of the Cass Review that looked at the evidence base for trooning out children (the systematic reviews that Cass commissioned from the University of York) were peer-reviewed and published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Publicity surrounding the review of English services has already caused politicians (definitely in Australia, at least, and probably too in Canada) to request a similar-style review of service provision there, but asking a public health system to investigate itself is always just going to be met with a wall of push-back (as even Cass herself can, and has, testified to. Hence the recent comments by Kemi Badenoch that Tony completely misrepresented). The systematic reviews that were published by
Archives of DiC will have an impact overseas, but this will take time.
