Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

[AltisticRight]

Clever. So it’s F?

ETA: holy shit I’m dumb. I thought @AltisticRight was paying respects

Yeah, F.

It's diagonally mirrored, so transpose the first one (top left).

 

[BIG_BRAD]

I awoke today with a vision of the future

 

[Popper Whiting]

My only concern with Dax is he's made a career out of being a screeching belligerent asshole and complete degenerate so when it does happen the impact will be lessened or barely even noticeable. Nick's downfall has been so entertaining because he had so far to fall, but Dick is already a total waste of space so I'm gonna need a fuck-up on the level of Ethan Ralph's Portugal double beatdown to really excite me.

I'm not suggesting he's not capable of this level of fuck-up, I'm just really struggling to think what Dax could do to have a Happening-tier event that makes him look worse than he already does. Right now my money is on getting arrested for selling class-As to high-schoolers, but in LA that's probably not even a crime.

My guess is meltdown due to multiple lolsuits. If Eric July finds cause and legally moves against him Dax will double down and seek to sue people he doesn't like as a result. You'll get more drunken outbursts, which will increase the likelyhood of a DUI or drug arrest. What will set it off is the sense he is losing control, and it will be a case of Dax thinking he's going to go out on his own terms, that going down in flames isn't that bad when you yourself set the fire and crash the plane.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

My guess is meltdown due to multiple lolsuits. If Eric July finds cause and legally moves against him Dax will double down and seek to sue people he doesn't like as a result. You'll get more drunken outbursts, which will increase the likelyhood of a DUI or drug arrest. What will set it off is the sense he is losing control, and it will be a case of Dax thinking he's going to go out on his own terms, that going down in flames isn't that bad when you yourself set the fire and crash the plane.

Rekieta and Diddler Dax both Joker-maxxing would be really wonderful.

 

[Desktop User2]

I awoke today with a vision of the future

View attachment 6099385

Fun fact: using IQ as proxy for intelligence is the only crime punishable by death in California.

 

[Richard_Wetpasta]

 

[genericwhitemale]

View attachment 6099323

My favourite part about that drawing is that people have posted it so much to illustrate his malding that he desperately wants to try and co-opt it.



He thinks this makes him look like he's badass and owning his haters epicly, but even in this edit his hair is ratty, his face is small, it's beet red and there's tears running down his it.

 

[Incecticyder]

In the the Witcher series Geralt just says "I would never be in that situation" to questions like that. It's really that simple. The actual goal of "what would you do if you were in my shoes" questions is to justify or absolve all of the decisions that actually lead to the decision or hypothetical.

Lolicon is the right answer for purely legal reasons, but I'm not sure how that matters in a discussion about morality. The state wants to define inflation as "prices going up" and insists that the money supply is unrelated to that.

I don't think Dick actually believes the lolicon thing. Autistic lolicons who dont get found to have actual CP who debate this stuff know that argument sucks. My theory is that Dick believes it is pedophilia and does not care. He just wants to defend his allies and does not care how bad they are as people.

Was Dax always this bad at arguing his points? I remember back in the day he was winning in his debates against Maddox. Was he winning through charisma alone and now the spell broke?

A better way to debate this would be: What is better? Commiting a crime and hurting someone or depicting someone being hurt without hurting someone? Should we arrest movie directors who depict someone commiting a crime, should we arrest actors for playing a role in which their characters commits a crime? Children cannot consent to sex but depictions of crimes, even crimes against children, cannot be made illegal. Who should we arrest in a movie where a child character is murdered even when the child actor is unharmed? The actor whose character pulled the trigger, the director or the writer?

I will say this though: I would be DAMNED if I let Cuties Fans/Pedos/Pedo Apologists anywhere near debates on what constitutes CP. Marie should really consider who she is sleeping with considering her career.

My guess is meltdown due to multiple lolsuits. If Eric July finds cause and legally moves against him Dax will double down and seek to sue people he doesn't like as a result. You'll get more drunken outbursts, which will increase the likelyhood of a DUI or drug arrest. What will set it off is the sense he is losing control, and it will be a case of Dax thinking he's going to go out on his own terms, that going down in flames isn't that bad when you yourself set the fire and crash the plane.

Rekieta and Diddler Dax both Joker-maxxing would be really wonderful.

Dax should just apologise to Eric before Eric takes his everything?

Fun fact: using IQ as proxy for intelligence is the only crime punishable by death in California.

That cannot be right. But then again California thinks that causing an AIDS epidemic for cash is not a bad thing, so...

 

[BIG_BRAD]

Was Dax always this bad at arguing his points? I remember back in the day he was winning in his debates against Maddox. Was he winning through charisma alone and now the spell broke?

He only argues with people he knows are dumber than him. That's why he only responds via catty RTs, and why the co-host on his argument show is Vito Comedy. Everyone else just gets blocked.

 

[Desktop User2]

I will say this though: I would be DAMNED if I let Cuties Fans/Pedos/Pedo Apologists

What was his argument for Cuties? That´s artistic expression hence beyond moral criticism like he claims loli is? Because if I remember correctly, the author was some chick from "Franceafrique" that said she was actually critiquing the early maturing of ghetto young girls. I believe that´s bullshit and some post rationalization of her work after the backlash because in every promo material it seems the opposite but, by the trailer and the excerpts that I saw, it was pretty accurate to 3rd world life for poor young girls.
I dont believe even the author, after the backlash, thought that portrayal of young girls was good in a moral sense.

Edit: stopped being a niggerfaggot and listened to his argument in the OP.

 

[UCantCCPMe]

This one is dedicated to you Daxi Pad

 

[AltisticRight]

My favourite part about that drawing is that people have posted it so much to illustrate his malding that he desperately wants to try and co-opt it.

View attachment 6099406

He thinks this makes him look like he's badass and owning his haters epicly, but even in this edit his hair is ratty, his face is small, it's beet red and there's tears running down his it.

My favourite part is the stock image site watermark covering this garbage meme. Zero effort put into it. Yet these fuckers are lecturing Eric July (Christian, successful businessman, married) on how to do his comic.

Anyway, here's another I made, with the revelation that Juju wears a buttplug with a pony tail attached.

 

[SlimyCuntStain]

Was Dax always this bad at arguing his points?

I think it comes down to whether or not you believed Dax was playing a bit to get a rise out of people. If you believed that he wasn't actually a scumbag, then his perceived success in arguments came down to whether or not he did indeed a rise out of that person, because that seemed to be what he was after most of the time.

 

[Incecticyder]

He only argues with people he knows are dumber than him. That's why he only responds via catty RTs, and why the co-host on his argument show is Vito Comedy. Everyone else just gets blocked.

Could he not find less problematic retards? Couldn't he just ask Sean to lose the debates on purpose? Was working with pedos the only way? His girl is working with kids for crying out loud! Did he not think that it might put her in a difficult situation?

What was his argument for Cuties? That´s artistic expression hence beyond moral criticism like he claims loli is? Because if I remember correctly, the author was some chick from "Franceafrique" that said she was actually critiquing the early maturing of ghetto young girls. I believe that´s bullshit and some post rationalization of her work after the backlash because in every promo material it seems the opposite but, by the trailer and the excerpts that I saw, it was pretty accurate to 3rd world life for poor young girls.
I dont believe even the author, after the backlash, thought that portrayal of young girls was good in a moral sense.

Edit: stopped being a niggerfaggot and listened to his argument in the OP.

I closed the video as soon as he started defending that shit. Also, ironicaly depicting children being exploited does not mean that the children are not being exploited. They were.

I think it comes down to whether or not you believed Dax was playing a bit to get a rise out of people. If you believed that he wasn't actually a scumbag, then his perceived success in arguments came down to whether or not he did indeed a rise out of that person, because that seemed to be what he was after most of the time.

I was under the assumption that both Dax and Maddox were playing an exaggerated character while debating semi-seriously.

 

[SlimyCuntStain]

I was under the assumption that both Dax and Maddox were playing an exaggerated character while debating semi-seriously.

I mean, in one way Dax is certainly playing a character: He's a massive faggot with the ability to turn a threesome with two women into the gayest thing imagineable playing the character of someone who's not a massive faggot with the ability to turn a threesome with two women into the gayest thing imagineable. He is bad at acting though.

 

[Desktop User2]

Also, ironicaly depicting children being exploited does not mean that the children are not being exploited. They were.

Critically =/ ironically but I agree that just because you are portraying something critically it doesn´t make it ok. Most damning in his defense of Cuties is the parallel made to Kids - which is straight up child sexual exploitation and absolutely should be banned. If that is the standard - and I don´t know because I didn´t watched Cuties or nothing Netflix related in the recent years - than he is way off: Larry Clark made that film in a total voyeuristic way.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

I awoke today with a vision of the future

View attachment 6099385

This was a surreal experience for the first few seconds I was still figuring out what it was.

 

[Incecticyder]

I mean, in one way Dax is certainly playing a character: He's a massive faggot with the ability to turn a threesome with two women into the gayest thing imagineable playing the character of someone who's not a massive faggot with the ability to turn a threesome with two women into the gayest thing imagineable. He is bad at acting though.

Two Girls, One Pussy.

 

[msd]

Just by using the internet and writing with proper grammar, you're probably like 110-115 range anyway. Your intelligence isn't a literal number, it's how you function in daily life.

I play dwarf fortress, my IQ should honestly be in the negative.

 

[Null]

What was his argument for Cuties?

I honestly don't even remember. I tried using the reddit to find activity about it but there's basically nothing. These are the top posts containing the word Cuties across r/TDS.



I went to TDS's archive and found that Episode 221 was the first episode that mentions "Cuties" in the description (+229, 251). So I've transcribed it to search through the audio.

It's honestly painful sitting through this. He's just screaming and screaming that people don't share his enlightened 200 IQ take.

• It's a genius marketing strategy!
• It's not for you, it's for kids!
• Pedophiles have access to worse on YouTube already!
• It's an autobiographical account from a French Senegalese woman!
• It's their culture!
• It's supposed to make you uncomfortable!
• The director deleted her Twitter! Are you happy!?

I don't think, when Netflix published this, that they wanted the kind of negative attention that they did, especially considering they were indicted in October 2020 (1 month after the movie was published on Netflix), and then they fought it in the courts for THREE YEARS before finally beating it in December last year. This defense inarguably cost Netflix hundreds of thousands of dollars and thousands of manhours to deal with.

https://www.newsweek.com/netflix-cuties-texas-child-porn-case-lucas-babin-1853608

If it's for kids, that's even worse. Dax brings up the South Park episode Raisins, which is 1) obviously not child pornography because of its art style, 2) obviously a criticism, and 3) obviously for adults. Making something that promotes sexual promiscuity in children is worse than making something enjoyable to the eyes of a pedophile.

He also completely, totally refuses to acknowledge that after the show came out people who did watch it reported that the actual film was worse than the trailer made you believe, and there were gratuitous close-ups of genital regions, which actually would violate the DOST standard and constitute child pornography. But like most abuse in the movie industry, the fact it's in a production encapsulates it in this assumption that there is artistic value, which is a defense against child pornography charges. It's not a defense to one's own eyes and ears.

Yes, as Vito pointed out, there is worse on YouTube and TikTok. That's also not OK. On 8chan, there were pedophile threads dedicated to searching for YouTube videos by "recent" using specially crafted search terms. There are Walmart webcams that have buttons to automatically upload videos to YouTube with names like "MyWalmartWebcam Video 20240618 124202" and kids would upload all sorts of weird shit that pedophiles hunt down. Also not cool Christopher Vito Gesualdi!

I don't care if it's autobiographical? Who gives a shit? Write a book. If you're raped as a child you can't just direct a movie where a child gets raped and then claim it's autobiographical so it's OK.

I don't care if it's their culture. Muhammad is a pedophile and he's burning in hell.

The "it's supposed to be uncomfortable" became the cornerstone of the Max Karson / MrGirl (Vito's pedophile friend) defense of the movie; that it gave him an erection and made him consider why he thought children were so sexy to him. What groundbreaking cinema!


And just for the record, no, Dax doesn't believe any of this shit. He doesn't care. He would personally rape and murder children if it would get him 100 more Patreon subs and no jail time. But that's what's funny: I told him the pedophile stank never goes away. He will forever be denied opportunity and access that he would have had if he hadn't of shacked up with Vito and MrGirl and spent 3 years defending a gross weird child exploitation film.


You can see the damage he's done to himself in this episode descriptions. Compare the detail of descriptions, the level of shilling (for a real audience), the guests, and the quality of art.



In his latest episode, he doesn't even have any guests, or they're people with extremely limited presence or no presence and are just fans from his Discord.

This is all self-inflicted, and he had prior notice. If he had cut Digibro off after I warned him about the pedo stank, he could have recovered. 250 episodes late and he's running a set that nobody wants to show up on because Dax Herrera is just "the Cuties guy" and Vito probably makes their basement smell like ass.