- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
Looking at it, those smudges are almost at the same place on every page. What would cause that?I don't think the report is real, too many artifacts and smudges. It looks like a work permit out of Schindler's List
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking at it, those smudges are almost at the same place on every page. What would cause that?I don't think the report is real, too many artifacts and smudges. It looks like a work permit out of Schindler's List
It looks like the paper is wet and was scanned. Guess what the local weather is like around Nick today?, too many artifacts and smudges.
<</CreationDate(D:20240618193840-05'00')
/ModDate(D:20240618193840-05'00')
/Creator(RICOH IM C2500)
/Producer(RICOH IM C2500)
>>
I'm going to wait a few days for this to simmer. On one hand I don't want it to be downplayed if true, but on the other hand it could be some gayops.i think it is fake. the fact that only one kid testing 5x over the limit, and none of the other children tested positive, is too suspicious.
Photocopier/scanner artifacts on the glass or imager.Looking at it, those smudges are almost at the same place on every page. What would cause that?
@MNPublicRecords explained how in this post.Court staff, an attorney, attorney staff, or someone watching over the children who likely were given copies of the order would be the most likely candidates
They look like fingerprint (or whatever) smudges on the scanner itself used to digitize the document. That's why they're in roughly the same spot every time.Looking at it, those smudges are almost at the same place on every page. What would cause that?
I don't trust it.Basing on what Jersh posted, I am not trusting that doc for now. This is all very fucky wacky.
I wonder if law enforcement and everyone at the local court house in his small town just fucking hates Nick at this point and they are aware of this site and leaking shit on purpose to fuck with him. I certainly would want to ruin this guy if I found out this guy was giving his child cocaine and possibly abusing her and he just keeps doing livestreams online painting himself as a victim.
Could have been scanned onto a usb from the photocopier but that's a helluva risk for someone to try to pull that off.Photocopier artifacts on the glass or imager.
If real, I'm leaning towards someone late in the day who is not terribly clever taking the documents and scanning them onto a USB in the office.The PDF metadata is both odd but consistent.
Timezone indicates a device in Central time so plausibly MN. But very late in the day. The device type is a standard large multi-function device such as you would find in a government office. But obviously both are trivial to fake.Code:<</CreationDate(D:20240618193840-05'00') /ModDate(D:20240618193840-05'00') /Creator(RICOH IM C2500) /Producer(RICOH IM C2500) >>
Holding my reservation if only because I can't stand the thought of a 9 year old with that much coke in their system.I am leaning towards this being fake just because of how extraordinary the leaking of a juvenile report is.
The pool of people having access to this filing cant be that big and why would any of those people take the risk of leaking it? It not like this is some TMZ level shit where someone could be trying to cash in.
Im going with it being the work of Diddler Dax in an effort to remove him self from the latest community post.