Balldo MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Lidl Drip]

So the 9 year old daughter tested right in the middle of the "Medium use (daily/weekends)" range. What an absolute scum-fuck piece of shit.
View attachment 6101695
View attachment 6101696

What's the best case scenario for how this happened? Little 9 year old girl wants to be near her parents and so sneaks into parents bedroom habitually and habitually comes in contact with the coke dusting their bed? How does this amount in a child not absolutely get Nick dragged behind a pick-up?

Honestly the worst case scenario is that they were actually abusing that child and giving her drugs and alcohol in order to make her pliable.

No way did she accidentally come in contact with it while the other children didn't to test for medium use. With the high amount she must have taken (remember those numbers are for adults and she's 9) there's no way this was a "mom confused the pill" or "she found it and tasted it" situation.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

If this is legit how would it leak?

Court staff, an attorney, attorney staff, or someone watching over the children who likely were given copies of the order would be the most likely candidates

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

To test that hot means it wasn't a one-time thing

Unless it literally happened right before they took the hair follicle (how soon after the arrests did they do this I wonder?).

But I'm not familiar with the intricacies of doing and testing for dope, so I wouldn't know the logistics of that either. What I suggested is still neglectful/abusive but it's also the only scenario I can think of in which the 9 y/o could've gotten a hold of that much coke aside from it being out in the open. Would your average 9 y/o just decide to eat a random white substance sitting around on the coffee table? 9 is well beyond the "put everything in you see in your mouth" toddler stage...

 

[DumbDude43]

There IS no best-case scenario. The only way for that kid to test that hot is for her to have been on coke on at least a semi-regular basis for a good long while.

best case scenario: fake document gayop (possible, document needs confirmation)
second best case scenario: lab tech made an error, samples got mixed up, etc (very unlikely)

Hair tests in children also look at passive exposure. Remember the child is not just exposed because they ingest it, but it being cut around them it being around them. They get curious and touch things. There are many studies showing high levels of cocaine in hair test in children who were not activel taking it due to living in drug dens. It just proves hes been exposing that child for a long time passively and since it looks back about a month that means its been around her that entire month at least.

but if it was from passive exposure, why would just one child be affected while all the other kids are clean?

 

[Chode]

Couldn't find the case in the court lookup, as per what Null said. Who could of had access to something kept to the household?

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

...April?

 

[Jeff Gerstmann]

MN attorney says that a JV file should not be accessible at any terminal and if it is that is a clerical error. MN draws attention to "The foster parents also appeared" as their identity is a crucial detail and its omission is suspicious.

Edit: "with and for the children" is ambiguous and doesn't actually indicate if the children are there, and since they're so young it seems silly regardless. Attorney does say that it's a template order that's been rush edited so it may be because of that, hence the 60% sure.

Sean just stated on stream he wouldn't touch it because it's way too risky for him.

 

[DumbDude43]

If this is legit how would it leak?

anybody who works at the court, or at the child care agency that is involved in the case, or for any of the attorneys involved in the case.
there could easily be over a dozen people who can get their hands on documents like this.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Wait am I reading this right? this is saying the 9-year-old's hair tested positive for cocaine at levels consistent with regular/daily use? and the other kids didn't?

It was specifically the child that he kept mentioning as the troublemaker in the house and his favorite child (credit to Cynthia for the below, big ups)

He's got 5 kids of whom I believe roughly break down like this: Christian 15, Avery (boy) 13, SyliviaMarie 10, AudreyRose 8 (the one who makes him nuts - GO AUDREYROSE!!), and CeciliaJayne 5.

Very physically violent with her sibs but then gets very sweet. Nick implied she's bipolar-ish in her mood swings. Nick loves her the most. He's basically said that. She's the one with night terrors, per Nick. Nick's often had to go off-screen to calm her.

See discussion below (just giving context, (not co-signing any of the speculation)

Kayla: "Never cross [my 7 year old daughter]. She comes into [my room] every morning: "Mom, I love you, can I snuggle you, can I hug youuu?" ... Of course child, because if I say no you might murder me!"

Nick: "Yep. She's exceedingly violent."

On another note, Nick has publicly talked about one of his daughters being violent. I wonder to what extent how that is being addressed (or not) will play into the allegations of neglect.

The first real red flag to me for their family being secretly fucked was the way that he talks about that kid. He went on some rant about how she's so random and weird and people just don't understand her, but the "quarky" character traits he was listing were just a list of the warning signs that a kid has been molested. I don't think he did it, but he seems determined to pretend it didn't happen.

He does have that one daughter he keeps bringing up who has these random violent outbursts according to him and he jokes about how she's gonna kill somebody some day.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

So the 9 year old daughter tested right in the middle of the "Medium use (daily/weekends)" range. What an absolute scum-fuck piece of shit.
View attachment 6101695
View attachment 6101696

What's the best case scenario for how this happened? Little 9 year old girl wants to be near her parents and so sneaks into parents bedroom habitually and habitually comes in contact with the coke dusting their bed? How does this amount in a child not absolutely get Nick dragged behind a pick-up?

This is what the Brave search AI said about cocaine in drug tests:

So this is recent use, but not necessarily super recent. As an aside, cocaine leaving the body so quickly for piss tests makes it a popular recreational drug among athletes who are tested regularly, which is unrelated but interesting. There's also the question of exactly how Nick's coke got into his 8-year old (the drug test was before her 9th birthday) daughter in the first place. Did she conventionally do coke herself? Was she somehow accidentally exposed to a lot of it? Did Nick himself give it to her? I can't answer that, and I kinda doubt we'll ever know for sure.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nick picked the perfect night to start streaming again

Literally every superchat is going to be about how he let his 9 year old gain access to cocaine

Have fun, Nick

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

The attorneys and judge all pop up on the relevant government searches, they are all active, and are relatively local to Wilmar. Of course, I looked it up in 5 minutes, so a forger could have done the same.

Edit to add: Sean just commented on this on his current live stream (about Young Thug). He's not touching it with a 10 ft pole, because it could affect his law license, even across state lines. This should not have leaked, similarly if forged.

 

[macrodegenerate]

I don't think the report is real, too many artifacts and smudges. It looks like a work permit out of Schindler's List

 

[Turbo Hornbag Hervez]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

These. Fucking. Niggers.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

Literally every superchat is going to be about how he let his 9 year old gain access to cocaine

HE WHAT

hold up what dropped cause Sean is going through the Young Thug shitstorm and mentioned he was DM'd a document and said even if he wasn't in MN he wouldn't read it based on that it's a document that wasn't suppose to be public and someone royally fucked up thus he can't or he could face a heap of shit.

 

[Hrothgar]

Anyone who gives him a penny at this point, no matter the motivation, is an absolute, irredeemable faggot.

 

[newuser131]

i think it is fake. the fact that only one kid testing 5x over the limit, and none of the other children tested positive, is too suspicious.

question is who planted this gay op? was it aaron or rekieta to own the farms?

 

[Devious Dave]

This is where I'm at now with nick

 

[polar bear]

Basing on what Jersh posted, I am not trusting that doc for now. This is all very fucky wacky.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

I am choosing to believe the document is fake due to the timing of the post coming just as Nick returns to youtube. I am also choosing to believe it is fake because if it were true it would be so horrible I don't want to believe it to be true.

 

[AltisticRight]

Jesus Christ Balldo.

Cutoff simply is there to mitigate false positives, hair testing positive for drugs doesn't necessarily mean the person was using them. To powerlevel a little my shoes got tested positive for heroine once after a business trip to Vietnam. It wasn't fun. I know more than enough to never touch that garbage.

Anyway, units here should be pg/mg, picograms per milligram.

Over 5000 pg/mg ~ 5ng/mg.
I don't know what to say. I won't try and dance around my words: this child is a drug user.

Cutoff criteria for various narcotics.


The amount of narcotics tested in hair, corresponding to usage.

You might ask why <500 is in there too. Some people have prescribed cocaine. Some are simply exposed to it for research/medical purposes.

Edit: This document is weird, they didn't even specify units which from my experience, typically would be ng/ml instead of pg/ml here, you had to infer it from the numbers they included.