Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, I’m going to go full blown QAnon here for a minute. I need your patience and if I’m totally fucking crazy just say it.

What if Nick leaked the document?

Could there be a semi-rational reason for him doing this? What are the chances of a person involved in the case…

1) knowing what the Kiwi Farms is?

2) risking leaking the document to the site

Also, how easy would it be to replace the kids results to a positive result?

But why?

1) Nick could use this entire fiasco for leverage against both KF and the court system.

2) Nick himself has the power to verify authenticity

3) Nick can then take legal action against Family Services and the court, possibly causing a massive upheaval. He can at least get a new person from Family Services to take over. That can cause all sorts of delays.

Because my brain is simple, let me give you my inner dialogue verbatim so you can understand how insanely stupid I may be.

In my Dome:

“If I was Nick I would definitely fake this and release it. It’s a document only he could verify which gives him immense power and control. The leaking alone, even if it’s fake, slightly altered, or even 100% real, gives him leverage. In this scenario any option works the same. He can take the rage of people calling for his execution and use it as evidence. Nick could easily say ‘Your honor, the integrity of the process itself has been undermined and there is no way I can get a fair hearing in this matter. Someone with access to the most highly controlled information has unethically copied this highly confidential document and released it to the notorious Kiwi Farms, a site dedicated to my personal destruction. The meta data proves it was someone from this state’

Let’s say the document is 100% accurate and unaltered. He could just as easily make the same claim and have it possibly work. Matter of fact, this almost seems like it could be a nice Hail Mary for the Family Services investigation. Nick knows there’s no way out of this, soooooo leak the document to bring doubt to the integrity of the system. Government operatives do this all of the time and it works. The only people that would have access to this with child names unredacted are parties involved directly and court or family services. Which one of them has anything to gain? Which one has any motivation to do this? And if it was someone involved and taking a huge risk like this, wouldn’t they at least redact the kids names?

Maybe I’m nuts and getting too conspiratorial here. I’m open to that. The leaking of this document is immensely helpful for Nick in the investigation itself. Attack the integrity of the process and make it unimpeachable. Force the system into a shakeup. Nick truly believes he’s smarter than everyone else and this is the type of thing narcissists do.

He looks so smug and confident in his attack
 
Last edited:
it is telling that rekieta never denied that the 9 y/o tested positive for coke.
I’d say he did. That people lie about stuff and him saying how stuff happened wasn’t how it went.
so, i believe the report now. if your youngest having coke in her system, either accidentally or intentionally, does fill you with regret for your actions, then nothing will.
I’d assume it does but he’s dealing with the internet and a bunch of people, even his so called friends, that would not seemed disposed to believe hum evrn if he said so.

That’s why he probably shouldn’t be talking about this publicly. It would likely help him make the case that people with access to important information are leaking stuff out of malice and directly public perception of him.

Especially if people like null can confirm they are real.

You have documents leaking that shouldn’t and sites and people hostile to Nick get a hold of them? That seems like good grounds to make a malice argument honestly.

Probably best not to confirm the legality of stuff beforehand though.
 
Here's a thought, might have been articulated here before, relatively dark.
If the kid "accidentally'" got to the cocaine stash she'd have overdosed, kids have no fucking idea what safe amounts of anything are or what drugs are, she'd have taken tons. The fact that she had long time usage (evidenced by micro dose amounts in hair) and she is still alive heavily implies she was given it by someone at a consistent basis.

I would love to hear a logical counter theory to this, looking at you Nick, feel free to explain it any time.
 
What if Nick leaked the document?

The only way this could be in any way, shape, or form, going in Nick's direction (and even then, it's doubtful) is if the tests were proven incorrect afterwards.
This is a somewhat old document after all.

Most people will take a Fed report at face value, and you have to be retarded to think that people will go along with your conspiracy theory without you telling them.
Fortunately, Nick's hard work has paid off with retardation, so your idea is possible.
 
Your honor, the integrity of the process itself has been undermined and there is no way I can get a fair hearing in this matter
None of this changes the facts that are in the document:
a) Kid was tested positive
b) Nick and Kayla do not submit themselves to tests
c) Nick and Kayla did not allow CPS full access to the house

So what if it's been leaked. So what if it's unfair. If the conditions at home are such that a child accessed narcotics, and the parents are not willing to cooperate with CPS, they ain't getting children back. Or at least - they shouldn't. At this stage it's a matter of their welfare and not of who's right or wrong.
If Nick and Kayla would have been completely clean and willing to create a safe space for the kids, they would cooperate to the fullest extent, from day 1.

Hiding a whiskey painting and throwing away empty bottles from studio is not enough.
 
Simple. Short social commentary saying something like "There is a lot of information going on out there in regards to what is happening in my life. It wouldn't be appropriate for me to comment any further than to acknowledge this is happening. I do not want to prejudice proceedings so I will make no further comment."
And then everyone would assume he did it. And say he should be saying sorry and admit guilt.

Because that’s moreorless what he did at first.

It’s why he should have shut up afterwards.
All I see is him digging a deeper hole for himself.
Indeed
 
If that's the case, this means there's 2 possibilities in my mind.

1. The kids were witnessing them do it and the 9 year old replicated what they had seen the adults in the house doing.

2. The kids weren't exposed to it and when they got hold of it and thought it was sugar or something and ate it.

I could be wrong but whatever the reason, it's not an excuse. The only kids that have that much drugs in their system, are normally found in places like Epsteins island.

I don't like where this is headed and the more that comes out, I think we're not even finished witnessing the horrors.
I'm going to talk about my childhood a moment. When I was 7, my grandpa was drinking a beer and woodworking in his workshop. I asked if I could try his beer and he said yes. I immediately spit it out because it tasted like piss. When I asked why he drank that stuff, he responded that adults like the way it makes them feel.

So third crazy option. Nick's daughter asked to try the cocaine she saw the adults using and they let it happen.
 
Simple. Short social commentary saying something like "There is a lot of information going on out there in regards to what is happening in my life. It wouldn't be appropriate for me to comment any further than to acknowledge this is happening. I do not want to prejudice proceedings so I will make no further comment."

All I see is him digging a deeper hole for himself.
It’s funny, we’ve had decades of celebrities and politicians doing this, but no one has seemed to learn from it. You get on TV, say the bare minimum, ask for privacy during this difficult time, and then fuck off until everyone forgets about you. Nick somehow chose the Discount Charlie Sheen method.
 
None of this changes the facts that are in the document:
a) Kid was tested positive
b) Nick and Kayla do not submit themselves to tests
c) Nick and Kayla did not allow CPS full access to the house

So what if it's been leaked. So what if it's unfair. If the conditions at home are such that a child accessed narcotics, and the parents are not willing to cooperate with CPS, they ain't getting children back. Or at least - they shouldn't. At this stage it's a matter of their welfare and not of who's right or wrong.
If Nick and Kayla would have been completely clean and willing to create a safe space for the kids, they would cooperate to the fullest extent, from day 1.

Hiding a whiskey painting and throwing away empty bottles from studio is not enough.
I’m not saying anything about this is good. I’m just saying there’s a rational argument for him leaking it because it would fit his deranged ideas and maybe achieve one of his goals.

He can publicly “confirm” the government is lying and out to get him, which he immediately did.

He can use the event to cause problems legally. Which he likely will do.

If I’m a party to this investigation, the last thing I’m doing is leaning this. If I’m family services, and I’ve gotten these test results on the kids, I want justice and I’m not going to risk upsetting the investigation
 
What the fuck.
1718793068623.png
 
I'm going to talk about my childhood a moment. When I was 7, my grandpa was drinking a beer and woodworking in his workshop. I asked if I could try his beer and he said yes. I immediately spit it out because it tasted like piss. When I asked why he drank that stuff, he responded that adults like the way it makes them feel.

So third crazy option. Nick's daughter asked to try the cocaine she saw the adults using and they let it happen.
I don't think that's likely, or at least I don't think its likely that she would have wanted to continue using it after trying it since it tastes fucking horrible, both if you eat it/rub it on your gums and the post-nasal drip if you snort it.
 
How it started:
On top of the world, kickstarted your own entire genre of content on Youtube, one of the most viewed content creators on that platform at one point, had family and friends that cared about you, and all the money in the world. You could build a brand and have it be successful enough to put all your kids thru college and then still easily retire early.

How it's going:
You got arrested for a drug charge, your kids are being taken away for abuse and neglect, you used to be visibly under the influence of alcohol and drugs when streaming(and you would still be if you could) and now you're about to cope and seethe about the news of one of your kids ingesting your own cocaine stash getting out. You wasted everything so you could have constant drug and alcohol fueled orgies with your wife and your new concubine and your house was a cluttered mess when the cops arrested you.

This dude is what Ethan Ralph would be like if he had two braincells to rub together even before the pillstream and if he was born with a silver spoon in hand instead of to another pill popping alcoholic schizo in Memphis TN. I guess it goes to show you that white trash comes in all forms and sizes, Nick and Ethan are two sides of the same coin. No wonder Gunt wanted Nick and him to be friends so bad right before the arrest, birds of a feather and all that.
It's so fucking stupid too because if he had just stayed away from the cocaine and the excessive alcohol consumption he could have had and fucked his wife and concubine in peace and nobody would have cared.
 
Last edited:
He says nothing stuff gets leaked out and taken as truth. Even when it’s not because as he said people lie. He probably views always being able to say he was always denying what people were saying publicly and the court will back that in the end.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, everyone's lying but Nick, the guy who constantly tells outrageous lies, just absolute batshit like "Rekieta Law was never a law channel!" Shit that you'd have to be retarded to even say with a straight face, or an absolute faggot face even, like Nick has. But this one time he's telling the truth and it's the entire world and your own eyes that are lying!
All I see is him digging a deeper hole for himself.
No, ignore this guy Nick! Quit being lazy. Pick up that shovel! You're not quite to HELL YET!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back