Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[everybody in Portugal]

Feet first, Nick. Feet first, Kayla.

If it was a one-time thing where she ingested a whole bunch then it's possible, even likely, that it was an accident. In which case not taking her to hospital for ingestion and potential overdose was bad enough in and of itself.

If it was long-term use then given the other behavioural problems Nick has alluded to multiple times, the chances are sky high that she was being dosed as part of more sinister physical or sexual abuse. Thank fuck none of the kids are likely to be handed back to these shit bags again. They're unironically better off in the foster care system.

I say again; feet first.

 

[NostalgicJam]

I know it's been said before in this thread and the main one but the fuckin nerve to ride around in your shitty car with an extra shitty plate, cruising around town with your coked up wife and mistress, streaming acting like everything is fine while your kids are starving, dirty, and getting into your cocaine? There is no rock bottom for this man. I thought the worst was over but for fucks sake man. Anyone defending this piece of shit after this i don't consider human.

 

[DumbDude43]

The cops did say the house was unclean. And the children did not seem to be being clothed fresh, what if it just built up?

these tests don't test for cocaine itself, they test for cocaine metabolites (the waste products that are created by your liver from cocaine in your bloodstream)
if there's cocaine metabolites in your hair, then at some point in the past there must have been cocaine in your blood. that does not happen unless you actually consume the drug.

 

[everybody in Portugal]

The cops did say the house was unclean. And the children did not seem to be being clothed fresh, what if it just built up?

The test is for what cocaine is broken down to by the body post-ingestion, not the physical presence of cocaine on the hair, my dude. Failing a false positive, there is zero chance she did not actually ingest cocaine, either in large amounts or smaller ones over a sustained period.. I don't know enough about the testing process to know if a follicle test will catch long-term use or if they'd need to test the strand for that, but if the former it opens up to the possibility that she was possibly even given large amounts frequently, scifags in the thread can maybe elucidate on this further. Either way, Nick and Kayla will hopefully be beaten to death on a cold Minnesota prison cell in the not-too-distant future.

 

[IrrelevantJackDoe]

The lolbertarian defense squad as been pushing "well if he uses drugs responsibly, it's not a big deal and he shouldn't be crucified for it." for a while now. I wonder what the next spin is going to be to justify this? Anyone who claims to care about his kids should be outraged.

As it stands letting your 9 year old into your stash isn't responsible drug use and I believe is justified for crucifixion.

 

[buttmunch]

Would nick have received a copy of this? maybe i'm schizo posting but isn't it weird they came out just before his big return, and enabled him to cry about having to shorten stream, try to frame his weird conspiracy theory they're all out for him and also generate more money because of angry retards donating to call him a piece of shit?

 

[trash cat]

From the doc, the indication that only the one kid returned a positive result (and a result that is insanely high for a child) indicates (to me) that this is not a single exposure event but a result of significant 'over time' exposure.

The document and the hair test result does not indicate whether this is a single cocaine exposure or a repeat cocaine exposure.

We can't draw a conclusion one way or another from the information we have.

All we can say is that this cocaine level is in the 10th percentile of adult cocaine users (5770 pg/mg). So it is a significant amount. See my previous post for additional technical details.

But these test results could be the consequence of multiple cocaine doses over a week, a month, or several months.

Or it could be one big dose on a single day.

I'm sure we'll find out more over time. What the lab can do is cut the hair sample into small sections, then test each section separately.





Testing the hair in small cut sections tells you whether the cocaine exposure stretched over multiple months or was confined to a smaller time window, like a two week period.

This is because hair grows at about 4-6 inches per year. Let's say 6 inches per year aka 1/2 inch per month

So if the hair tests positive for cocaine metabolites in the 1/2 inch closest to the scalp, but no where else, then you know the cocaine was consumed in the most recent month only.

If the newest 3 inches of hair growth all tests positive for every half inch section, then you know cocaine was consumed at least once per month for the last six months.

The current report does not tell us whether it was a single cocaine exposure or a repeat cocaine exposure.

A future report might tell us that because it's technically possible.

 

[Desktop User2]

that it was an accident.

Probable, because a bunch of hardcore junkies like the Rekietas would know if someone is tampering with their stash. The accident occurred because the girl is fathered by a bunch of criminal junkies. It gives credence to Imholte´s story tho with cocaine bullets slipping through sofas everywhere and that massive faggot will take a victory lap on that.
Rekieta even talked about his case like an absolute white trash moron, I cant remember even Ralph doing this. We are on the last lap, guize, this motherfucker is done.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

these tests don't test for cocaine itself, they test for cocaine metabolites (the waste products that are created by your liver from cocaine in your bloodstream)
if there's cocaine metabolites in your hair, then at some point in the past there must have been cocaine in your blood. that does not happen unless you actually consume the drug.

Oh dear.

I wonder if someone accudentaly added one to many 0s in that report. A part of me thinks they might have.

Because with a child having that much I’m real shocked this wasn’t caught earlier.

 

[deeman]

Is this the girl who played Soccer? Did her teammates call her Maradona perhaps?

 

[MadStan]

The defenders of Nick have no regard for the welfare of children. Their attacks on the critics of Nick should be grounds to investigate their own families as no doubt, they too believe children exposed to this kind of substance abuse, immorality and sexual deviance is completely acceptable.

But don't you believe it, according to the critics it is Kiwifarms that somehow caused a 9 year old to be exposed to Coke, and Nick is the victim here.

 

[FundusOHoolihan]

The person with whom I discuss the rackets fiasco with irl has tapped out. "I think I'm done. This is too dark." Big yikes.

 

[Tomato flowers]

Oh dear.

I wonder if someone accudentaly added one to many 0s in that report. A part of me thinks they might have.

Because with a child having that much I’m real shocked this wasn’t caught earlier.

Hope springs eternal I guess but all the kids would have been positive if it was some kind of accidental or environmental exposure. It’s only one.

 

[The Cunting Death]

as a fellow dad i got got some solid advice to improve his children's lives: neck yourself. maybe take your wife with you.

I'm not even a dad, I'm uncle to at least 8 kids, and I'm genuinely angry at Nick and his cunt of a wife.
I feel your pain.

 

[Gloria The Glorious]

For the past few years, it felt like every story of the foster care system and Child Protective Services raised questions if they were trying to protect children or just punish parents. This is absolutely a case for why they should exist.

 

[Cronkle]

I live in a place that has been hit particularly hard by the whole fentanyl problem (like everywhere else now it seems like), so I’ve been around plenty of people with very bad drug problems. Around here you have to be careful with any drug now, because they’re finding fentanyl in fucking everything, including cocaine, which would drop a grown adult, let alone a little girl (as if just unlaced cocaine is any better for a child to get their hands on). I hope Nick understands how lucky he is that that kid is even alive. On top of that, I’m sure even the worst junkies and irresponsible niggers that I know of would make absolutely sure that any child in the house couldn’t just find and get into their stash. Congrats, Nick. You went from super successful streamer to being lower than any local nigger I know of

 

[Desktop User2]

btw for the kid to have snorted or ingested coke, the Rekietas 100% did drugs in front of them. A 9yo wouldn´t know how to get high by herself, specially if she doesn´t go to public school.

 

[William Tyndale]

I’m not playing devils advocate here, so please don’t think that this is me defending either of the rekeitas, nor am I defending the situation. I just want to make sure everyone here understands the drug testing process a little better. I feel like everyone has the idea that little mini rackets was sitting around blowing lines with mom and dad or that she was a coke addict sneaking lines behind their back. (While this is possible, I don’t think it’s likely.)

Hair samples are a window into use going as far back as the timeframe the hair has been growing out of your head. They are the most rigorous of testing methods and the results go back in time further than any other method.

It *could* be possible that she found the stash, thought it was sugar, and ate a spoonful of it. She could have sprinkled it on her pancakes thinking it was powdered sure. Again, this does NOT absolve Nick and Kayla of any responsibility, but I think it’s a more likely explanation for a 9 year old testing positive than some of the other explanations I have seen here. (Like her being drugged up and raped by the adults). That one accidental dose would show up in a hair sample and look like constant use.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

@trash cat
Considering Kayla got hit with child neglect knowingly. I have a feeling they might not have known. If it was the family emergency, they found out and covered up an accident. But the fact that it happens seems to stick round well after that fact.

 

[newuser131]

Oddly enough, due to personal experience I somewhat believe Nick saying Sweeps made shit up,

Spoiler: Powerleveling

Due to actions by my ex wife, CPS wanted to talk to my daughter, the long story short is my ex wife’s boyfriend sexually abused by daughter and my ex wife tried to cover it up. When I finally got a copy of the CPS report to file with my custody modification, (which in my state, they will not give to anyone except guardians and DA’s, and the copy I was given had heavy redactions), it claimed they had talked to me over the phone three months before my first ever contact with CPS. The report claimed I told CPS everything was fine and there is no reason for them to talk to my daughter about these allegations. I knew this wasn’t true, I even pulled my phone records from Verizon. I asked my CPS case worker about this, I left many voicemails and many text messages about it, she completely ghosted me and I never heard from her again. I even brought this up with the District Attorney that prosecuted the case, and she couldn’t get CPS to answer anything about it either.

TLDR: CPS does make shit up

i understand but how do you lie about the lab test results. if that was made and lied by cps, then i would agree with you, but the lab test results have a paper trail and any lie there can easily be exposed.

i don't see ms. sweep or any other government official outright lying about that. i can see the state exaggerating the circumstances in the report, but not the test results. could there been a mix up? possible, but then again, on the stream, why did rekieta just say that and will get his own independent test asap?

it appears that rekieta's strategy is to get right wing q-boomers mad at the government instead of looking at the facts. has rekieta disputed any facts as presented by the state? no.