Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
But in which direction? Are they saying that people who did use didn’t pop positive or that people who didn’t use got false positives?
Here's a link to the study. The specificity (ability to detect healthy individuals) of hair follicle drug tests is more than 90%, meaning that false positives effectively don't exist. However, the sensitivity (ability to detect unhealthy individuals) of the test is lower.

This is to say that the test gives false negatives, but only very rarely false positives.
 
I get a really fucking bad vibe with all this, Kayla and Nick are not just bohemian and immature. They have a screw really fucking loose somewhere, this shit is pathological.
Considering Kayla always gave everyone offputting vibes when she was on stream, I would not doubt it.

We know Nick and Kayla are mental fuck ups. It seems likely stuff is way worse than we thought.

Wouldn’t be surprised if it is even way worse than they or their family realised.
 
This article is pretty interesting.


Oral administration of cocaine seems to be a pretty understudied area.

“A previous report (15) indicated that repeated oral cocaine administration produced a metabolic profile that was unlike that observed after parenteral administration; however, these data were obtained after repeated cocaine administration, and it was unclear whether the differences in metabolism were due to the chronicity of dosing, the oral route of administration, or a combination of the two. After acute parenteral administration, plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) for BZE has been estimated to range from 1- to 7-fold that of cocaine (16), but repeated oral administration resulted in BZE AUC values ~20-fold higher than cocaine (15). Likewise, EME AUCs after parenteral cocaine administration are three-fourths that of cocaine (16) while EME AUCs after repeated oral administration were 5-fold higher than cocaine (15).”

So according to one study, oral administration of cocaine results in a different metabolic profile, meaning that dependent on what metabolites are measured for in a hair follicle test, it may not be detectable.

Simultaneously, other studies indicate that the values of metabolites after oral administration is drastically higher (up to 20 times) than with other routes of administration.

So speculating here, but if the girl accidentally ate some cocaine one time, that could possibly have resulted in the levels in the follicle test being so high.

(Though there’s a lot here we don’t know, and it doesn’t seem to be a thoroughly studied area.)

Either way it’s too soon to say anything for sure, but the theory that Nick say and gave his 9 year old lines to snort on a daily basis, looks pretty weak.

Though who the hell knows.
 
“Onset of absorption after oral ingestion is delayed because cocaine is a weak base with a pKa of 8.6, and is thus in an ionized form that is poorly absorbed from the acidic stomach”

But god forbid reading more than two lines, right?
I'm not even sure why I'm arguing on the internet about this, your reading comprehension withstanding, what this is saying, objectively, is that the only pharmacological effect that oral ingestion has is that it takes longer to absorb. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s002280000147

If you'd only bothered to keep reading just a few more lines...

he delay in absorption after oral ingestion may account for the popular belief that cocaine bioavailability from the stomach is lower than after insufflation.
Drug smugglers have OD'ed and died because cocaine balloons burst open in their GI, yet, you're here suggesting that the human body can't metabolize cocaine ingested orally.

I'm guessing you're going to change the goal posts now, or just stop responding.
 
The digestive tract continues through the intestine, no? The question is: is there a difference in %metabolized via oral x other forms of consumption? Of course shooting it up or reaching the blood via the pulmonary tract is faster but does it jsut pass through the intestines and is totally excreted?

Oral ingestion of cocaine is completely possible. The reason the nose is preferred is because its a more direct and more efficient path into the body. Its absorbed orally into the body. Some of the chemicals come out in the urine. I don't know what part of it is excreted.

People have died over the years from poisoning themself by oral cocaine. Drug mules eating balloons can have it happen if one of them breaks. There are also occasional addicts who die that way. See the case of 1980s pro wrestler Gino Hernandez for an example.
 
The kid didn't eat enough coke to get to that level thinking it was sugar. She'd stop way before because her entire mouth and throat would be numb as shit. That's why in the movies you see the cops put a tiny bit on their lip, that was the old school field test, because back in the day a lot of heroine was also white. Numb lip = cocaine.
 
She didn't just test positive, but way hot. 500mg was the cutoff on that hair follicle test. Audryrose's level was over 5000. She just turned 9 years old last week, BTW.
IMG_8921.jpeg
Honestly the worst case scenario is that they were actually abusing that child and giving her drugs and alcohol in order to make her pliable. :(

No way did she accidentally come in contact with it while the other children didn't to test for medium use. With the high amount she must have taken (remember those numbers are for adults and she's 9) there's no way this was a "mom confused the pill" or "she found it and tasted it" situation.
I am fearful that the lady Rackets charge wasn’t a mistake. That the poor child was abused sexually as well.💢😡
View attachment 6101716
Jesus Christ Balldo.

Cutoff simply is there to mitigate false positives, hair testing positive for drugs doesn't necessarily mean the person was using them. To powerlevel a little my shoes got tested positive for heroine once after a business trip to Vietnam. It wasn't fun. I know more than enough to never touch that garbage.

Anyway, units here should be pg/mg, picograms per milligram.

Over 5000 pg/mg ~ 5ng/mg.
I don't know what to say. I won't try and dance around my words: this child is a drug user.

Cutoff criteria for various narcotics.
View attachment 6101753

The amount of narcotics tested in hair, corresponding to usage.
View attachment 6101754
You might ask why <500 is in there too. Some people have prescribed cocaine. Some are simply exposed to it for research/medical purposes.

Edit: This document is weird, they didn't even specify units which from my experience, typically would be ng/ml instead of pg/ml here, you had to infer it from the numbers they included.
Happy belated Father’s Day. You know, Chris Chan probably would be a better parent than Rekeita.
 
If you expose your child to narcotics to a point that flags them as a user, I don't give a shit how they were exposed, as a parent you are garbage, you should be imprisoned, and your parental rights revoked. To all the people saying "Well maybe she didn't snort it!": Stop trying to deflect for these fucking monsters.
 
Even from a political perspective, ruthless self-interest would suggest a course of action to minimize the sentence rather than pursing a "moral" course of action involving seeking vindication by a government which he believes is criminal, dishonest and out to get him.
What if minimising the sentance requires you prove them wrong is some regards? If Nick is right he should not be punished as badly.

It might not be about morals. It might be he’ll get hit with a unjust sentance if he does not fight this and then everyone thinks he did something he did not.

Especially when people are seemingly leaking stuff to screw with him.
 
You shouldn't. It actually makes Aaron look worse. Think about it. The fellow churchgoers who saw Nick's kids ONCE A WEEK noticed one of their kids was tweaking and they looked and smelled like shit. Aaron, who just spent weeks asserting he never did cocaine with them and was SOBER, somehow either didn't notice this or didn't care. Not for nothing, but Nick and Kayla are so doped up and retarded they can't remember to feed their kids. At least they have some kind of excuse. But Aaron was fucking sober and still didn't give a shit. I don't buy it that he didn't know.

The way you guys jump through hoops to defend this scumbag orbiter is appalling. Just because he releases spicy details doesn't mean he isn't one of them.
Also if I had to guess which adult was abusing a child on drugs. My first guess would be the non-male relative. Then the male relative. Either way he left out the details about that kid being on drugs because he knew it would make him look bad. Everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt because he knows he could be in deep shit.
 
Magi Chan only started this mess. Nick and Kayla CHOSE to give their 9yo cocaine, or were so sloppy that she was able to get into it on the regular. Either one is beyond the Sonichu curse's power.
More over, Warski could be an example of someone overcoming the Magi Chan curse and getting sober. It's like people saying "the devil made me do it." Satan only tempts and sways, it is the person who chooses to succumb to the temptation that makes the degeneracy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back