Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, just to play devil's advocate here, the most reasonable explanation for a positive hair follicle test may be that the metabolites are the result of a prescription medication.

In support of this,
  • Being prescribed Adderall is a valid defense as to why urinalysis will test positive for methamphetamine (which is not cocaine, but there are similar cases with cocaine).
  • 9-year-old had narcolepsy, where stimulants may be prescribed. Unsure, but I think also ADHD?
  • If she is the only one prescribed a -caine suffix medication, that would explain why she is the only one that tested positive.
In argument against this,
  • Managing drug addicts is effectively the #1 job of the criminal justice system. I find it difficult to believe that the tests do not pull a list of her prescriptions and cross-reference that against her results, especially in the extraordinary case of a 9-year-old testing positive.
  • This defense does effectively require the state to lie by omission.

If she was temporarily prescribed a -caine suffix medication like Lidocaine or Novacaine for a routine procedure, that may not show up on her Rx list but would be in her system? But if that's true, would it show up in the quantities demonstrated by the results?
he could be exonerated by the court and it would mean nothing. he needs to kill himself or get killed in prison.
 
More over, Warski could be an example of someone overcoming the Magi Chan curse and getting sober. It's like people saying "the devil made me do it." Satan only tempts and sways, it is the person who chooses to succumb to the temptation that makes the degeneracy.
A curse like the Sonichu curse only works if you give in. You CAN pull up. You don't HAVE to give your kids coke. But it certainly makes it easier.
 
If she is the only one prescribed a -caine suffix medication, that would explain why she is the only one that tested positive.
Yeah but - if it's that's simple and innocent, why didn't he say it on stream?

He already said a lot of bullshit that he shouldn't have said - why not mention the one and only thing that can make people stop jumping to worst conclusions.
 
Managing drug addicts is effectively the #1 job of the criminal justice system. I find it difficult to believe that the tests do not pull a list of her prescriptions and cross-reference that against her results, especially in the extraordinary case of a 9-year-old testing positive.

Some Googling here suggests that kids exposed to Cocaine can test positive through testing even though they may not have ever intentionally consumed cocaine. I'm not going to take the time to research this though, because, to be honest, Nick is a degenerate sex and drug addict who appears unrepentant and quite frankly I don't care what the government does to him at this point.

My only hope is that the kids turn out alright.
 
This article is pretty interesting.


Oral administration of cocaine seems to be a pretty understudied area.

“A previous report (15) indicated that repeated oral cocaine administration produced a metabolic profile that was unlike that observed after parenteral administration; however, these data were obtained after repeated cocaine administration, and it was unclear whether the differences in metabolism were due to the chronicity of dosing, the oral route of administration, or a combination of the two. After acute parenteral administration, plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) for BZE has been estimated to range from 1- to 7-fold that of cocaine (16), but repeated oral administration resulted in BZE AUC values ~20-fold higher than cocaine (15). Likewise, EME AUCs after parenteral cocaine administration are three-fourths that of cocaine (16) while EME AUCs after repeated oral administration were 5-fold higher than cocaine (15).”

So according to one study, oral administration of cocaine results in a different metabolic profile, meaning that dependent on what metabolites are measured for in a hair follicle test, it may not be detectable.

Simultaneously, other studies indicate that the values of metabolites after oral administration is drastically higher (up to 20 times) than with other routes of administration.

So speculating here, but if the girl accidentally ate some cocaine one time, that could possibly have resulted in the levels in the follicle test being so high.

(Though there’s a lot here we don’t know, and it doesn’t seem to be a thoroughly studied area.)

Either way it’s too soon to say anything for sure, but the theory that Nick say and gave his 9 year old lines to snort on a daily basis, looks pretty weak.

Though who the hell knows.
You are the dumbest nigger to ever figure out how to post. Cocaine is the primary analyte (the most detectable thing) for the antibody cocaine test. BZE has a cross-positivity of 0.05 meaning that it gives 5% as strong a reaction as cocaine ergo even if it was deposited in 20 times the quantity, which it wouldn't be because hair deposition is dose independent, it would give the same reaction as let me do the math for you retard 20 x 0.05 = 1 times the amount of cocaine.

You've been sucking Rekieta's balldo since the cocaine bust went down and nowhere has it been worse than this thread, "I bet the hair samples got switched" "the test doesn't respond to unmetabolized cocaine" I'm trying to push back against the idea that the kid has been deliberately or habitually dosed with cocaine and I don't want to be associated with you. You make this site worse by reading it, let alone posting.
 
Last edited:
The only solution for Rackets at this point (in Roblox of course)
 

Attachments

  • raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg
    raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 13
People are idiots! This document has no affect on the criminal case.

There is a criminal case and a civil case(CPS case). They aren't joined. Therefore, this document doesn't affect criminal case, at all.

I think any drug testing results of the children would indirectly come into the criminal neglect case against Kayla. Perhaps any findings by CPS as well.

But those findings would be in other documents and not what was leaked out yesterday.
 
I'm starting to believe in the sonichu demon.
I'm actually dumbfounded. This is beyond heinous. And the fact that there are STILL people who believe Nick can turn everything around and go back to being Le Funny Lawpope.
I can't.

Fuck you Rackets. Fuck you and your dumb cunt of a wife. Fuck the Amholes. I hope you four all get eaten by wild boars.
As hilarious as the Sonichu Demon theory is, it's not likely. According to the timeline, Nick was already doing blow and fucking other people's wives before he got the medallion.

The Sonichu Demon doesn't make you do anything. It just applauds when you do it. Then it shits its pants and does nothing.
 
Was it ingested in any way or was the powder flying around in the home?

By the typical behavior of junkies and the description of the bedroom where they were preparing/storing the coke in the police report, I would think that coke was flying all around the bedroom and thats its everywhere in the room.

Trap house junkies never care about cleaning up the coke.
 
What a surprise. Your theory is always that Nick was an innocent victim of everyone else in the house
Nick deserves to eat a bullet. He's a fucking junkie who's barely functioning and can't remember to feed his own kids.

Aaron spent weeks fucking asserting his sobriety and being the responsible one in all of this. Yeah, he's going to get a lot of the blame.

The best case scenario is Nick was too doped out to notice his kid tweaking and Aaron didn't care or say anything or is just ungodly levels of retarded. And that's at fucking best. Fuck them both.
 
Listen, this is all very dark, but im wondering what a 9-year-old would do on cocaine, like" here are all of my ponies assembled in both order of importance and by color variance."
Children usually will go into seizures quickly because the toxicity level is lower for them. Their bodies cannot deal with the cocaine the same way an adults can. It all fits that 3 day period when he said there was a family medical emergency.

In my experience working with removed children they will also test higher on those tests because their body cannot deal with the cocaine not sure if its an actual thing or not though or just what I've seen. You can't very well do research by exposing children and seeing what numbers they give.
 
Okay, just to play devil's advocate here, the most reasonable explanation for a positive hair follicle test may be that the metabolites are the result of a prescription medication.
Amide anaesthetics won't ping a false positive for cocaine. There aren't any medications that will. The most plausible scenario where the kid wasn't using cocaine is that the lab techs just completely shat their pants and and mixed up her paperwork with a crackhead's somehow.
 
Okay, just to play devil's advocate here, the most reasonable explanation for a positive hair follicle test may be that the metabolites are the result of a prescription medication.

In support of this,
  • Being prescribed Adderall is a valid defense as to why urinalysis will test positive for methamphetamine (which is not cocaine, but there are similar cases with cocaine).
  • 9-year-old had narcolepsy, where stimulants may be prescribed. Unsure, but I think also ADHD?
  • If she is the only one prescribed a -caine suffix medication, that would explain why she is the only one that tested positive.
In argument against this,
  • Managing drug addicts is effectively the #1 job of the criminal justice system. I find it difficult to believe that the tests do not pull a list of her prescriptions and cross-reference that against her results, especially in the extraordinary case of a 9-year-old testing positive.
  • This defense does effectively require the state to lie by omission.

If she was temporarily prescribed a -caine suffix medication like Lidocaine or Novacaine for a routine procedure, that may not show up on her Rx list but would be in her system? But if that's true, would it show up in the quantities demonstrated by the results?
Nope, lidocaine or novacaine scrip won’t cause false positive. Granted, this study was for urine tests but still…

 
I just need a confirmation that if this leak is illegal in any way it will not complicate the case for the prosecution, cos if it does that would suck.
It would absolutely complicate it. That’s why doing so is a big no no. Otherwise everyone would do it. The question is what other fuckery might be going on.
And I hope he doesn't try to capitalise on the leak and it becomes his advantage. This unhinged behavior sort of suggest that's his intent.
I mean, if you are having underhanded questionable shit done to you, you’d be silly not to use it to your benefit.

And the leak absolutely seems to be somebody or group of people trying to screw him over.
 
So, I have a question and a Schizo Theory

Q:Which Rekieta Kid was the one who wouldn't talk to the cops and let them in? I think the original report said a ''young girl'' IIRC

Shizo Theory: If it was the 9 year old, then she presumably has been told by Nick ''Don't talk to the cops'' and she would have some vague idea of avoiding incrimination.
So, if she came to the door, refused to let the cops in, then Nick was brought to the house by the police. Is there any chance she knew where the coke was and tried to hide it and accidentally ingested some amount?

Would there be enough time for the coke to work it's way through her and appear on the hair follicle test? (realistically, I'd imagine not)

Still, any theory that doesn't involve the kid being made a regular user by Nick is my preferred theory right now. WIth Nicks behavior I wouldn't be surprised if he shared with all the kids though. That would be FUNNY AND WEIRD.
 
I think any drug testing results of the children would indirectly come into the criminal neglect case against Kayla. Perhaps any findings by CPS as well.

But those findings would be in other documents and not what was leaked out yesterday.
The actual test result maybe, but not this document.

Fucking Nick will never get his kids back. CPS will never give kids back to someone blocking CPS from drug test results.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back