Desktop User2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
1.The CPS docs specifically cites cocaine, you do not read the docs;Just wanted to add that we don’t know what the test was for: Metabolites or cocaine.
If it’s oral ingestion, the metabolites could be different or show up in different values as for intranasal/IV cocaine use, which these tests are usually geared for.
Follicle tests aren’t also as easy to do as a blood or urine test. And it happens every so often that they fuck up with tests.
The weird part is not just that it’s only ONE of the kids that tested positive (and the levels) but especially that none of the kids not reporters bring it up.
If Anneroseyelizabeth or whatever her name is, had been taking coke on the regular, I’m pretty sure that SOMEONE, whether her siblings or teachers, would have noticed something.
I get it. It’s FUNNY to think that Nick has been doing rails with a nine year old, so people assume the worst.
I just don’t buy it.
And ultimately of course, it’s something that will be brought up in the trial, so we will see.
2.You have no idea what you are talking about regarding the tests and cocaine absorption, poorly researching it on the fly - I have little to none as well but certainly am not making statements about them;
3.Null identified Dyn as a respectful source of information regarding the test - you may not trust Jersh but you would have to be better informed on the matter to counter, which you clearly arent.
I dont believe Nick actively fed his kid coke, that being said, but, the tests being confirmed, I believe they totally did drugs in front of the kids and the 9yo got curious.