Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Mikoyan]

He pretended to not know what Kiwi Farms is, who Null was, and then put on this macho tough guy voice. Grabbing the mic WingsofRedemption style and calling Nick a motherfucker, fuck, fuckity fucker POS. Real larp.

There is no goddamn way he doesn't know The Farms, not at this point.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Is it possible it could have stayed since January? Does any cocaine test go back that far? There's speculation in this post that Nick's "worst day ever" where he had to sit with a child for multiple days while they recovered was an OD.

https://kiwifarms.st/posts/18630675/
Nick's worst-day-ever has been a big question for half a year now.

By the way the worst day and the mystery illness cancellation aren't connected. He talked about his worst day ever all the way back in July of 2022. Speculation runs rampant because he has never elaborated but at the time it was assumed to be relationship issues or issues with our wifes family

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Someone must not like Nick to be leaking these things. Wonder why. Must be some sort of government conspiracy. A drunk, incoherent retard is definitely on the top of their list of things threatening the deep state.

With how tight knit the community seems to be and how big this is It would not surprise me if someone that knows him and his kids works at the court

 

[BlastMonk]

and has expressed traits common among the abused,

Do we have a timeframe for these though. I remember a several year stream of the Rackets both talking about her being violent and having nightmares. Unless she was molested years ago as an even younger child, several years before Nicks current drug addiction and hedonism bend, it may just be concidence.

 

[GenociderSyo]

I guess it could be possible, hair tests vary massively from person to person in how much and how long they retain the metabolites.

I wouldn't think it's likely, though.

I read in one study that children's hair is more porous so holds onto the drugs longer is that a real possiblity?

 

[BlastMonk]

try and keep Nick's attention on her and away from the children

I remember when people here figured out they went to Hedonism 2, there was speculation that she agreed to swinging as to keep his attention and keep the marriage going. But going along with a sudden change in sexual lifestyle and drugs to try and protect the daughter and keep the family together could also be possible

 

[AnsemSoD1]

These might just be the most retarded names that I have ever seen barring only the ghettotards that I went to high school with.

 

[AnOminous]

It is not an outlandish conjecture to suggest that Nick's "favorite daughter" whom is in the ideal age range for the aforementioned freaks was being groomed with drugs.

Thing is, this is such an obvious conjecture that CPS would obviously have considered and looked into this too. So if it did happen it's almost certainly going to come out, but in the absence of any specific reason to think it, it's just wild ass guessing at this point and I don't believe it.

I think it's more likely that the family "health issue" Nick used as an excuse to blow off a stream was the daughter accidentally getting into the stash (or these two low-life scum just leaving mini-stashes all over the place), and they decided to just roll the dice and hope she got over it rather than take her to the hospital (and get immediately arrested).

It's not that I'd put this past Nick or any of the disgusting scumbag creeps who orbit him, just that if it did happen, it's coming out anyway.

 

[Dyn]

I read in one study that children's hair is more porous so holds onto the drugs longer is that a real possiblity?

Probably. I think even hair colour makes a big difference.

 

[clownpiss]

seeing innocent children who never got a chance to be their own person get permanently fucked up from the people who are supposed to care and unconditionally love them is depressing. most people have traumatic memories from childhood and how it shaped them and this is so much more wicked.

nicks parents might have raised a piece of shit but theres no indication they are, if there is trust fund money is there a process where the kids have to be with the state before they can be transferred to the grandparents?

 

[ATI Escapee]

I read in one study that children's hair is more porous so holds onto the drugs longer is that a real possiblity?

Not Dyn but I dont see how the porosity matters if the metabolites are being used by the body to construct the hair. It isnt being absorbed from the outside, the metabolites are waste products the body needs to excrete and does so through hair growth

 

[Desktop User2]

Probably. I think even hair colour makes a big difference.

It´s Jan30 - End of May as well; 4 months, not half a year.

 

[Affirmative Blacktion]

Let's be real guys. I know this is hate rekieta thread but he certainly didn't give the kid coke and let him snort it .
Did the kid find and try it? Did his mom kiss him with coke nose and mouth? How did kid end up with coke in his system anyways

 

[Blacked2AutisticBoogaloo]

Here’s a fitting outro song Rekeita can use for his revamp.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

Ah now I feel bad about deleting it. I thought I was just way off in factless speculating the most horrid situation possible based on pretty circumstantial evidence.
But has anyone given a reason why Kayla seemed to go so hard so quick into drugs, resulting in a very quick collapse of a clean, stable healthy home life for all her children. Like Nick has been a deadbeat druggo for about a year now? Longer? But the home life of the dirty kids, cluttered home, kids not going to school or being fed is very recent and just a 6 months-3 months-ish development. Did Kayla just slide into full blown addiction then or did she find out about a molestation (if it even happended) and just give up mentally.

I'd say Nick moving in a permanent girlfriend probably was the final straw. For years Kayla went along with the swinging shit and Nick getting hookers, but a live-in girlfriend that was possessive over him took things to a whole new level of fucked up drama and mental illness. It seems April was brought into the relationship about 6-7 months ago so it lines up with the obvious rapid descent.

I think the real collapse isn't as recent a 3-6 months it was just gaining steam. I think she was on a hard downward spiral the last three years but things tend to snowball, so it got a lot worse a lot faster these past six months. I'd guess losing the nanny helped the facade crumble faster since you suddenly had no stable, reliable adult ensuring the house was cleaned and kids fed/bathed on a daily basis. Having a nanny would have greatly helped keeping up appearances even if she was a basket case coke fiend. I also have a theory that Kayla's contact with her family and friends became estranged. Given how bad things had gotten she would have had to pick between Nick or regular contact with her family. Nick would not tolerate their criticism or worry or gossip among the community. Kayla would have gone from having friend and family for years, to her entire social life revolving around Nick and April. Kayla is a doormat. She gave up her kids for Nick, so I'm sure everything else in her life became collateral damage too.

I also have a theory that coke was finally the thing that helped Nick get Kayla to shut up and go along with him. Once she had a taste for coke he could have used that as wicked control mechanism for both Kayla and April.

 

[BlastMonk]

Let's be real guys. I know this is hate rekieta thread but he certainly didn't give the kid coke and let him snort it .
Did the kid find and try it? Did his mom kiss him with coke nose and mouth? How did kid end up with coke in his system anyways

If you read the thread you'd know it was a her. The main guess is that she took from her parents stash to experiment and nearly OD'd. How exactly drugs got into a child will be investigated by the police because they sure as shit want to know to

 

[Apis Mellifica]

Do we have a timeframe for these though. I remember a several year stream of the Rackets both talking about her being violent and having nightmares. Unless she was molested years ago as an even younger child, several years before Nicks current drug addiction and hedonism bend, it may just be concidence.

Could be coincidence certainly, but given the situation as a whole they shouldn't be disregarded. I cannot see any sane rational reason why a child would be given cocaine in any frequency. Sociopath Nick makes comments about pedophilic media and recently made that depraved joke about his children being raped at church. It all seems greasy.

 

[Terrorist]

SEE BARNES WAS RIGHT IT WAS THE KIDS!!!!! SUCK MY NUTS AYLOGS

Nick’s RAT kids have violated his constitutional rights and he will SUE them for back-owed cocaine

 

[6MillionCoofs]

seeing innocent children who never got a chance to be their own person get permanently fucked up from the people who are supposed to care and unconditionally love them is depressing. most people have traumatic memories from childhood and how it shaped them and this is so much more wicked.

nicks parents might have raised a piece of shit but theres no indication they are, if there is trust fund money is there a process where the kids have to be with the state before they can be transferred to the grandparents?

No. State wants to put you with family if they can. Assuming Nick and Kayla can’t get their kids back transferring them to other members of the family will be what they do. They’ll only go to the state if relatives can’t take them.

 

[Anstiv]

Okay Kiwi Spergs, some of you skipped statistics 101.

The null hypothesis is the inverse of whatever your hypothesis is. If your hypothesis is "monkeys like bananas" the null hypothesis is "we will not find that monkeys like bananas".

Type 1 errors, in short are false positive results of a test. In more technical terms, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is erroneously affirmed that there is a statistical difference.

Type 2 errors are false negatives. The null hypothesis is erroneously affirmed.

Drug testing optimizes for type 2 errors, not type 1 errors. I found this study that says when it comes to cannabis follicle testing, they expect 0 (with 95% confidence) instances of false positive (meaning the person was erroneously found to have drugs in their system when they did not), and many more false negatives.

I would expect the balldowashers to come out in droves to say "'nooo follicle testing has an x% chance of being wrong" while completely misunderstanding (or lying) about the fact that those are false negatives, not false positives.