Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I want to address something and hopefully give some (much needed) positive conjecture on the matter of the kids.

It's been posited that the children are not with family currently due to the repeated use of the term "foster" in reference to placement. In Minnesota, the law is very clear that for any extended period, which is what this hearing was for, children must be placed with licensed foster parents.

However, and this is the good news, Northstar, the program that governs the entire foster program, has a very robust kinship placement and assistance program, which will seek out and work with family members to become licensed foster parents in order to take a kinship placement. There are specific provisions to waive the license requirement as long as the placement is with kin and the kin the children are being placed with are actively working to become licensed.

In summary, it is very likely, in fact almost a certainty, that the children have never been and will not be outside of the care of relatives. Robert Rakeita being at the hearing is a good indicator that the family is taking this seriously and working to take care of the children.
 
There is nothing to call his thinking but extreme mental illness.
When I hit bottom, I was that ragged, shambling, homeless fuck mumbling to himself, sleeping in parks, eating food from Catholic food pantries, and drinking out-of-date cooking wine scavenged from restaurant dumpsters. First days in recovery, I could barely think or read or articulate complete sentences. As you say: extreme mental illness. It took months for the fog to clear and regain clarity of thought, years more to get my life back.

To the point: If Rekieta is a cross-addicted alcoholic and cocaine abuser (and he is), then he is almost certainly incapable of formulating and executing complex legal strategies. The best he can do right now is whatever his defense attorney tells him to do. If I were his attorney, I would be telling him--begging him--to get the fuck offline, to shut the fuck up.

Delusional bastard probably still thinks he can salvage his YouTube career.
 
Without power leveling I have seen the scenario you describe play out. You were spot on in your line of reasoning, it was a very good post and I would have quoted it directly. There's another possibility that Kayla slid further into drug use to try and keep Nick's attention on her and away from the children, this is all speculation of course since True and Honest Nick seems very adamant about not disclosing anything despite his demands for transparency from the state.
Also have to keep in mind that there was a nanny in the picture too taking care of the kids. Judging by how much of an irradiated ghoul Kayla looks like I would wager that she's been using just as long as Nick and the decline in the home is more related to the nanny quitting. At this point fucking anything is possible, but I think something like Nick giving her some because its, "like basically Adderall or whatever," in a drunken stupor is more likely.
 
Well, Nick claimed he was soooo fucking busy lately, I guess now we know what he was busy doing!
  • Avoiding drug tests
  • doing drugs (allegedly)
  • CHIPS visit to the balldo compound
  • moving a couple of paintings around the balldo vault
  • driving around
  • Supervised kid visits
  • Finding lawyers for CHIPS case
  • CHIPS court sessions
 
Either that or so much coke got into the hair that when they tested wrong, according to Nick, is gave a stupid high result.
Somehow that sounds just as bad if not worse. Kids weren't bathing and were living in a filthy home, ok sure, but so filthy that vicaine was just a naturally occurring substance around even the children? I mean wasn't it slipped that Nick was spending $20,000/mo on cocaine? How much cocaine would $20,000 convert to, and could it be enough that it could just be that accessible in their household?
 
If she is the only one prescribed a -caine suffix medication, that would explain why she is the only one that tested positive.
1tfnkslj84n01.jpg
 
When he says it's testing metabolites outside the body does he mean that the test picked up cocaine in her hair? Because while that's not as bad as her being under the influence of cocaine it's not exactly a win for team Rekieta.
Also it doesn't really make sense. Metabolites don't just sit on top of the hair, they are integrated into the structure of the hair shaft. That's why they aren't lost when the hair is washed before testing.
And positive results are confirmed with a second test so Nick's fucked. They would have had to contaminate two separate samples the exact same way both times.

I think what nick is trying to argue is that since his daughter sleeps in bed with the family sometimes, the metabolites in his sweat soaked into the porous shaft of her hair and that's what deposited the metabolites. But that just raises more questions (why are you getting your daughter's hair literally soaked in coke sweat regularly?) AND still wouldn't invalidate child endangerment.
 
Nick really doesn't know how to shut the fuck up.
I mean... yeah, I'm nothing to do with the lab tests, but it seems like he is insisting that there's no chance that the kid ingested cocaine.

I don't know which bodily fluids contain the most cocaine metabolites but this has a horrific implication.

Either that or so much coke got into the hair that when they tested wrong, according to Nick, is gave a stupid high result.
It's metabolites, so a substance excreted by the body after cocaine is ingested. I really hope I'm wrong in that, but Nick is denying that the metabolite was not the child's own excreted metabolite.
I think what nick is trying to argue is that since his daughter sleeps in bed with the family sometimes, the metabolites in his sweat soaked into the porous shaft of her hair and that's what deposited the metabolites. But that just raises more questions (why are you getting your daughter's hair literally soaked in coke sweat regularly?) AND still wouldn't invalidate child endangerment.
Yeah... I don't think sweat or saliva has that many, since it's mostly just water. I think this kid was exposed to blood, or worse, which managed to soak into the hair.
 
2 questions I probably missed getting answered elsewhere.

1) what does ROI mean when it talks about Nick and Kayla refusing extra drug tests and such?

2) when it says that Nick/Kayla didn't contest them taking the kids, does that mean they had the chance to contest and DIDN'T or that they just haven't yet.
 
Is there any way of distinguishing whether the sample came from the kid ingesting it, or can it be a contaminant from contact with another person?

I'm not sure how often Nick licks his kid's head, but there are four adults, all of whom have used cocaine, and doesn't one of them have a sexual abuse charge of some kind?

I'm not sure if I'm understanding the test - Nick says it can be from outside the body, but wouldn't that imply that some kind of substance from one of those adults ended up in the kid's hair...?
If she didn't pop for benzoylegonine then it could just be that cocaine dust got in her hair. A result of norcocaine but no benzoylegonine is sus and shouldn't be called 'positive', but I'm not sure CPS care so much about the finer details.
 
Granted, I'm no expert, so I'm just parroting what my research I did into this test would suggest, but from everything I've seen, his potential excuses are slim and don't hold up the best. The test seems to be more looking at frequency of use rather than amount consumed. Meaning this isn't "she got into the stash once and nearly OD'd", and it's incredibly unlikely that the test would show such an extreme false positive due to close contact rather than actual use for one child and not the rest.
 
I really find it odd that Nick seems quite upset about this document being leaked, and upset about anyone talking about his case when he's trying to claim he doesn't care about people's opinions and his reputation and what he states is his response to all of this is "I have a lot to say and people will make their own conclusions, oh well."

Then why are you so fucking angry about people forming conclusions based on what they've seen and what they know about you?

Nick thinks he is too clever for everyone and can speak about his case without revealing anything about it, but he's revealing so much through is behavior. And I hope to see more, because his arrogance and hubris is legendary at this point and will sink him.

When he says something like "if you really believe a government document, cut your penis off and stick it between your toes" he seems to be implying that either the gubmint is lying or they're totally inept and got things all wrong.

Just say you're innocent then, bro.

Unless....
 
NICK FUCKING STOP YOU TARD
Hard disagree. Keep it up Nick, in fact talk shit about the new Judge, the D.A., and especially the jury. Look each of them in the eye during the trial and make sure they know that you are better than them. No doubt they will all see your superiority and throw out any and all cases, including Monty's, and ban you from ever being tried or sued again.

Now, this may strike some Kiwis as harsh, but I believe everyone involved in this case should die.
Beat me to it.

Nick's worst-day-ever has been a big question for half a year now.
Nick's "worst day ever" was back in 2022 right after the end of the Depp trial. It is all but confirmed that this was when Kayla asked to open the marriage. That was the start of this glacier sized snowball.

Nick, and if you read this Kayla, just rope. Seriously your kids will be better off dealing with that trauma than whatever comes next should you ever get them back. For their sake just rope.
 
Yeah... I don't think sweat or saliva has that many, since it's mostly just water. I think this kid was exposed to blood, or worse, which managed to soak into the hair.
Oh yeah, I'm not agreeing because the fearsome foursome would Basically need to collect a bucket of sweat and let the hair marinate in it for this to even be plausible, but Nick's claim was that the test picked up on metabolites in the kid's hair that came from outside her body, and the only people oozing coke metabolites in the house are the adults.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back