Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Dyn]

Dyn's the one to ask about whether or not it's ingested.

Okay so one of the metabolites they test for is norcocaine, which is metabolised from cocaine in the body, but is also a byproduct of washing out the cocaine paste, so it already contaminates pretty much all the cocaine you'll ever find in the world. If she tested positive for norcocaine but not benzoylecglonine (which would have been metabolised in her body and should be far more abundant in a positive reading), then that's a sussy reading and Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.

 

[Doctor Love]

The reality is that Nick is lying poorly and his kids been directly consuming the cocaine. It's just not possible for external metabolite deposition to ping that high.

It's horrifying that this is the better option of the two.

Okay so one of the metabolites they test for is norcocaine, which is metabolised from cocaine in the body, but is also a byproduct of washing out the cocaine paste, so it already contaminates pretty much all the cocaine you'll ever find in the world. If she tested positive for norcocaine but not benzoylecglonine (which would have been metabolised in her body and should be far more abundant in a positive reading), then that's a sussy reading and Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.

Thanks. So there is a chance that Nick has only sprinkled his daughter in cocaine.

Could you answer:

Unlikely, Nick doesn't have enough coke in his system at any given time for a wayward jizz missile to dose someone's entire head with enough cocaine metabolites to ping as regular use

 

[Mousey0328]

This is one way people that are under CPS review wil try to get out of drug testing. And when your child is taken away you are told you cannot cut your hair because there will be drug testing.

Nick would have to rid himself of all hair, toe nails, and fingernails. CPS can and will test any hair or nails. I hate to tell Nick, but him blocking the drug test results will result in a positive result. A missed drug test will automatically be positive, in the eyes of CPS judges.

 

[Strix454]

really find it odd that Nick seems quite upset about this document being leaked, and upset about anyone talking about his case when he's trying to claim he doesn't care about people's opinions and his reputation

In Nick's brain, all his problems have nothing to do with his own behavior or the situation at his house. Nick is convinced that he can still gaslight the entire world into thinking he never did coke even once, that the kids were always well taken care of and he was never addicted to anything.

Nick gets angry when people who were eyewitnesses (Aaron) or information appears (the CPS transcript) present information that contradicts his gaslighting. He sees drug testing or rehab as providing information to his enemies that contradict his narrative. Nick is totally convinced that the solution his problems is for everyone involved to lie better.

 

[NotADrunkLawyer]

Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.

And Nick would somehow think that makes him seem much better.

 

[Dyn]

Could you answer:

I have no idea what levels of cocaine metabolites one should expect to find in jizz.

 

[Desktop User2]

It’s been said, but it’s picograms. Per milligram of hair. And it’s metabolites. So the amount the child ingested could well have been tiny. The amount stuck to some gunmy bears she found, for example.

No, it´s not metabolites. The doc states "Audreyrose tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." It´s plausible how one @Dyn said it could be just cocaine powder on her hair but why only her, what was she doing frolicking on coke at the time of the arrest - remind you they only found coke on the master bedroom - and how was she exposed to it?

 

[Markorian]

Okay so one of the metabolites they test for is norcocaine, which is metabolised from cocaine in the body, but is also a byproduct of washing out the cocaine paste, so it already contaminates pretty much all the cocaine you'll ever find in the world. If she tested positive for norcocaine but not benzoylecglonine (which would have been metabolised in her body and should be far more abundant in a positive reading), then that's a sussy reading and Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.

The issue becomes then why it's only one kid, and why that kid was so far out of the range of what could conceivably be a false positive, while all the other kids were negative.

 

[hawkisnight]

Ha! Take that Karenfarms! Kids weren't hungry after all. They were on coke! Those darn kids. Total Balldo vindication

 

[Catastrophes]

Just so everyone sees it, here's what Nick/Kayla are supposed to abide by, per this order. Their decision to post the bond that doesn't automatically subject them to drug testing superficially seems at odds with any intention to comply with this, as does Nick's yee-yee ass haircut, but IANAL.


Edit: words

 

[Doctor Love]

I have no idea what levels of cocaine metabolites one should expect to find in jizz.

Ah, well, that's something you should find out!

 

[Desktop User2]

They charged both of them but under different sections.

Nick's:
Endanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-GEndanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-G
Statute: 609.378.1(b)(2)
Additional Statute: Endanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-G (609.378.1(b)(2))
Level of Charge: Gross Misdemeanor
Offense Date: May 23 2024 05/23/2024

Kayla's:
Neglect or Endangerment of a Child/NeglectNeglect or Endangerment of a Child/Neglect
Statute: 609.378.1(a)
Additional Statute: Neglect Child-Knowingly Permit Physical/Sex Abuse (609.378.1(a)(2))
Level of Charge: Gross Misdemeanor
Offense Date: May 23 2024 05/23/2024

In Kayla´s arraignment, didn´t they omit the Neglect Child -Knowingly Permit Physical/Sex Abuse?

 

[Procrastinhater]

Stop sweeping. The only past behavior we have to go on is his word which is worthless.

The only person who ever claimed Nick was a good Father who spent all his time running around for his kids is Balldo himself or his cocaine goblin wife, both of whom are proven fucking liars.
All the evidence that isn't from Nick suggests he's a fucking terrible, neglectful Father, and his attitude since his bust seems to confirm that.
Balldo's actions are not the actions of a man who cares about his children one bit, in fact they line up with odd statements he's made and observed actions on stream that suggest he actually resents them and doesn't particularly care to get them back.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Is there any way of distinguishing whether the sample came from the kid ingesting it, or can it be a contaminant from contact with another person?

Assuming the lab follows standard testing procedures for at risk children (which I'm gonna assume they do), an initial positive result will have resulted in a second test of a fresh sample from the child before absolutely anything else. A couple days apart wouldn't have any significant impact on the results - the metabolites ain't going anywhere.

Labs get a lot of shit, often deserved when it comes to backlogs, but they really don't like fucking up.

Edit in response to:

I have no idea what levels of cocaine metabolites one should expect to find in jizz.

About the same levels as in hair. It's not often measured cause it is, by the nature of jizz, ephemeral.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Just how much cocaine does it take to kill a nine year old girl?

I don't know Mr. Owl.... Let's find out!

 

[Gay Baby Jailer]

The whole nick molested his daughter and intentionally gave her coke is a serious stretch. Nick is a faggot but what probably happened is that (like with everything he has done recently) He was just grossly negligent and, like Aaron has noted, left some amount of cocaine unattended so that the 9 year old confused it for something else like sugar. Nick probably shares at least one bathroom with the rest of the kids right? I doubt he abides by the rule of only doing cocaine in a place where children don't have access to. He may have done cocaine somewhere and then child interacted with the residue.
If I recall correctly, Cocaethylene is formed when alcohol is co-ingested with cocaine, and as far as I know hair tests should be able to detect this. I don't think its likely Nick was drugging his 9 year old intentionally in some retarded conspiracy in the presence of all those other people. Swinging with adults while molesting your daughter doesn't really fit the MO of a pedo.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

Fuck it, I'll just state it - did Nick's semen make its way onto her head? Is that why they have a sexual abuse charge?


I'm not confident enough in that - I have very approximate knowledge of the finer details, here. I just found Nick's wording really weird. Dyn's the one to ask about whether or not it's ingested.

But - if it was ingested - then it implies some kind of adult bodily fluid was mixed into the girl's hair. I can't unconnect those dots.

the fact that these are the dots your brain can't stop connecting says something about you more than it does anyone else.

 

[Vibralldo]

So it was def ingested, AND Nick implied there was so much of it that it could just naturally occur in his kid's hair. Question now is, if there was so much, then did she merely breathe the stuff in? Or did she actually take it herself (doubt) after seeing the adults do it? Or, most morbid I'd say, did they give it to her on purpose?

Also, is there any medicinal substance that can cause a positive cocaine test?

She's an 8 year old, I wouldn't be surprised if Nick left loose cocaine out and she just ate some of it thinking it was sugar

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Their decision to post the bond that doesn't automatically subject them to drug testing superficially seems at odds with their desire to comply with this

I BELIEVE that the child care case is separate from the matter the bond was for.

 

[AnsemSoD1]

Wait until we start hearing about crystal meth.