Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's metabolites, so a substance excreted by the body after cocaine is ingested. I really hope I'm wrong in that, but Nick is denying that the metabolite was not the child's own excreted metabolite.
So it was def ingested, AND Nick implied there was so much of it that it could just naturally occur in his kid's hair. Question now is, if there was so much, then did she merely breathe the stuff in? Or did she actually take it herself (doubt) after seeing the adults do it? Or, most morbid I'd say, did they give it to her on purpose?

Also, is there any medicinal substance that can cause a positive cocaine test?
 
Also, is there any medicinal substance that can cause a positive cocaine test?
Yes. Cocaine_for_kids.png
 
1) what does ROI mean when it talks about Nick and Kayla refusing extra drug tests and such?
Release Of Information
Basically Nick and Kayla told the drug testing lab that their test results can not be shared with Child Protective Services.
Absent a further court order CPS can not get that information. So the order basically says, they didn't agree to the drug test so that's part of the reason we're requesting not to return the children.
 
Oh yeah, I'm not agreeing because the fearsome foursome would Basically need to collect a bucket of sweat and let the hair marinate in it for this to even be plausible, but Nick's claim was that the test picked up on metabolites in the kid's hair that came from outside her body, and the only people oozing coke metabolites in the house are the adults.
Fuck it, I'll just state it - did Nick's semen make its way onto her head? Is that why they have a sexual abuse charge?

So it was def ingested, AND Nick implied there was so much of it that it could just naturally occur in his kid's hair.
I'm not confident enough in that - I have very approximate knowledge of the finer details, here. I just found Nick's wording really weird. Dyn's the one to ask about whether or not it's ingested.

But - if it was ingested - then it implies some kind of adult bodily fluid was mixed into the girl's hair. I can't unconnect those dots.
 
Say the 9-year old has a medical issue like narcolepsy or ADHD (which I've seen mentioned but haven't seen a clip of Nick confirming), I think these idiots were legitimately attempting to use cocaine to treat their child. If they can't be fucked to feed and do the bare minimum of chores to keep the kids in clean clothes, there's no way they are making sure their children's prescription medications are being re-filled. I base this on the comments from Aaron about Nick's explanation of his cocaine usage. He says it helps him deal with the extra stress in his life and I have no doubt he uses it to treat his own narcolepsy symptoms. I think they intentionally dosed the kid on multiple occasions instead of just driving to the pharmacy. It could have absolutely been a scenario where the kid got in the stash one time a few months ago. But based on how brain damaged both of them are now, I lean towards this being an intentional thing.
 
In summary, it is very likely, in fact almost a certainty, that the children have never been and will not be outside of the care of relatives. Robert Rakeita being at the hearing is a good indicator that the family is taking this seriously and working to take care of the children.
Pretty good chance the family may file a hostile bid for custody too. We can only hope.
 
Now normally I'd say this is the point where balldowashers would finally turn on our boy Nick, with kids now in danger from their antics, but then again there are folks saying 6yo children should be bathing themselves by themselves every day on their own accord.

Still, this is going to turn even more ppl against Nick quickly I feel. In Nick's drug addled and abused mind right now, he really thinks he's going to save his online persona. Get a grip, Nick. That's not going to happen.
 
Not justifying the behavior at all, but I genuinely believe this is a case of neglect and not malice. 5000mg on a 9 year old also seems like it would be a complete lethal dose. I'm probably going to wait this one out until further info comes out.
It’s been said, but it’s picograms. Per milligram of hair. And it’s metabolites. So the amount the child ingested could well have been tiny. The amount stuck to some gunmy bears she found, for example.
 
He messages me out of the blue to say two things:
1. To thank me for locking his thread.
2. To deny that his child tested positive for cocaine.

He claims the test is faulty, is testing a metabolite which exists outside of the body, and also that the levels of cocaine they are suggesting she had in her would indicate that she should be dead.
This might already be covered by the time I post this but 5000 pg (which is what the kid tested at) is totally within the low-medium range of what’s considered medium use (weekend or daily use). The range is 2,000 to 10,000 to qualify as “medium use” of cocaine so his “she would be DEAD” is total bullshit. Her test result was within a standard range for what’s defined as “medium” cocaine use for NY state drug testing criteria in hair panels

 
Sometimes I'll just be minding my own beeswax on the internet and then stumble upon something I know I'm getting put on a government watch list just for reading.
Hah, reminds me of the time I was looking up articles about how porn consumption fucks with young minds.

I realized that I made a google search that included the words "child" and "porn".

So anyway I'm being watched for the next 60 years.
 
Fuck it, I'll just state it - did Nick's semen make its way onto her head? Is that why they have a sexual abuse charge?
Unlikely, Nick doesn't have enough coke in his system at any given time for a wayward jizz missile to dose someone's entire head with enough cocaine metabolites to ping as regular use. You'd need to be using it as shampoo to have that high a metabolite concentration in hair.
The reality is that Nick is lying poorly and his kids been directly consuming the cocaine. It's just not possible for external metabolite deposition to ping that high.
 
If she was ingesting cocaine frequently why just slap Kayla with Child abuse but not Nick as well? Could it be that Kayla was giving the child cocaine on purpose?
They charged both of them but under different sections.

Nick's:
Endanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-GEndanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-G
Statute: 609.378.1(b)(2)
Additional Statute: Endanger Child-Permit Present Sale/Poss Cont Subs-G (609.378.1(b)(2))
Level of Charge: Gross Misdemeanor
Offense Date: May 23 2024 05/23/2024

Kayla's:
Neglect or Endangerment of a Child/NeglectNeglect or Endangerment of a Child/Neglect
Statute: 609.378.1(a)
Additional Statute: Neglect Child-Knowingly Permit Physical/Sex Abuse (609.378.1(a)(2))
Level of Charge: Gross Misdemeanor
Offense Date: May 23 2024 05/23/2024
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back