Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[AnOminous]

I really find it odd that Nick seems quite upset about this document being leaked, and upset about anyone talking about his case when he's trying to claim he doesn't care about people's opinions and his reputation and what he states is his response to all of this is "I have a lot to say and people will make their own conclusions, oh well."

Because if it was obviously complete bunk, it would tend to support his claims of innocence, but it isn't and doesn't.

To the point: If Rekieta is a cross-addicted alcoholic and cocaine abuser (and he is), then he is almost certainly incapable of formulating and executing complex legal strategies.

He's been that way for months, babbling incoherently, making unintelligible "jokes," and the big giveaway, looping because he forgot what he just said. He doesn't currently look acutely intoxicated, but he also isn't sounding much more coherent.

Even if he really did get off the coke and booze, he has a long road ahead of him, and I don't think he even intends to try. If he did, he'd have agreed to the testing and be racking up Good Boy Points in anticipation of a deal offer.

As it is, it's abundantly clear this worm loves cocaine more than his own flesh and blood and that the only reason he even cares they were taken is it makes him look like an absolute piece of shit (which he is) and thus gives him narc injury.

Maybe he's planning to go down in flames and then pull a Lowtax.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

In Kayla´s arraignment, didn´t they omit the Neglect Child -Knowingly Permit Physical/Sex Abuse?

IIRC, the judge mentioned it in the charges.

 

[Harm]

We're at the point where the best case scenario is that the 8 year old inexplicably tested positive for cocaine metabolites that can exist outside of the body at levels that match semi-regular cocaine usage without also testing positive for cocaine metabolites that only exist inside the body, and for unknown reasons the other 4 children didn't test positive for any cocaine metabolites whatsoever.

That's the "phew, what a relief!" outcome now. Every other outcome is both more likely and more horrifying.

 

[not william stenchever]

So do we know which kid's bedroom he wanted to build an attached sex dungeon next to?

 

[Doctor Love]

coke metabolites can only come from coke... my point is he is confirming tacitly the test is correct it is just not as bad as we think (that she ingested coke).

Well, the alternative is that someone else ingested cocaine, and then that person's metabolites ended up in the child's hair.

That's the "phew, what a relief!" outcome now. Every other outcome is both more likely and more horrifying.

Yeah at this point, "one of the adults had a catastrophic injury, covering the child with blood" is still less horrific.

 

[Pistoleer]

Say the 9-year old has a medical issue like narcolepsy or ADHD (which I've seen mentioned but haven't seen a clip of Nick confirming), I think these idiots were legitimately attempting to use cocaine to treat their child. If they can't be fucked to feed and do the bare minimum of chores to keep the kids in clean clothes, there's no way they are making sure their children's prescription medications are being re-filled. I base this on the comments from Aaron about Nick's explanation of his cocaine usage. He says it helps him deal with the extra stress in his life and I have no doubt he uses it to treat his own narcolepsy symptoms. I think they intentionally dosed the kid on multiple occasions instead of just driving to the pharmacy. It could have absolutely been a scenario where the kid got in the stash one time a few months ago. But based on how brain damaged both of them are now, I lean towards this being an intentional thing.

What I find just mind blowing is the idea of parents letting a 9 year old get coked out. My best friend’s kids are that age and they have to limit them on sugar and caffeine or they turn into human superballs. So a kid that age on coke would be all but impossible to control. Which makes me wonder if that’s part of where the mustiple people reporting them came from. The kids go to multiple houses for schooling and one is ping ponging around the room constantly would raise questions.

 

[Telvanni]

I mean, a document leaked to him, Nick directly talked to him about said document and Null is trying to get the bodycam footage.

Chance is certainly increasing…

Been a while since I did law so treat this more as an educated guess than actual expertise.

If I was the state prosecutor, it might be worth considering Josh as a witness regarding his drug use and noted negative behavioral changes because.

1. He is a proprietor of a website that actively documents and disseminates information regarding Nick.

2. Josh has had direct communication with Nick and has publicly stated he has spoke about related subject matter via electronic communication

3. He is currently obtaining the video tape of the arrest and depiction of his house.

I would subpoena these communications and potentially Josh himself to impeach Nick’s defense and credibility. Thus, X(Formerly known as Twitter), his website discussions/dms, and phone conversations might be subpoenaed.

Though not as many, there are a few reasons Nick’s defense could subpoena Josh

1. Highlight Josh and his website as super mega Hitler particle abundant to show certain evidence may not be credible tldr “Das nawttruuuu!”

2. Subpoena communications to show potential exculpatory evidence

3. Not legal related, but to force Josh to testify becausehe knows our dear Josh is notably camera shy and would probably be what Nick could do to be vindictive

I can’t guarantee he will be called to the stand, but I can almost guarantee he will be subpoenaed for his communications. I would recommend he speak to Harding on this matter. (I'm sure he has/will)

 

[Bonesjones]

Lightly dusting a fifth of the total child population with cocaine?

You joke but it's like that with money, it's not that people are using vast quantities of currency to snort coke with, there's just enough incidental contact between bills that do with bills that don't that you get positives. While he's a moron and deserves everything he gets, I'd need to see more information about how bad this particular situation is.

 

[Strix454]

The Denial Stage, I just want to see one great CWC tier rage from him before he goes to jail or kills himself.

The most likely moment for that is when he discovers that the warrant isn't going to be suppressed by the court.

Nick's moments of weakness are typically moments of cognitive dissonance. The moments when he is forced to directly face the lies he tells to himself about who he is.

 

[Doctor Love]

I'd need to see more information about how bad this particular situation is.

Oh, well, it goes from "lightly dusting exactly one (1) child with cocaine" and gets worse from there.

 

[chomp chomp]

He messages me out of the blue to say two things:
1. To thank me for locking his thread.
2. To deny that his child tested positive for cocaine.

He claims the test is faulty, is testing a metabolite which exists outside of the body, and also that the levels of cocaine they are suggesting she had in her would indicate that she should be dead.

When was the last time he messaged you? I assumed you hadnt heard from him in months at this point.

Balldo is addicted to contradiction. I love how he says his family comes before everything yet hes constantly proving otherwise.

Gets arrested and spends the night in jail and the first thing he does when he gets out is hop online and makes a joke on his locals. Any person truly concerned with their family wouldnt have their online followers opinions on their mind at all.

Finds out damaging documents that he already knew about get leaked and the first thing mr "i dont care about my reputation and what anyone thinks about me" does is immediately get online on the one website he pretends he doesnt look at anymore and follows it closely enough to catch it briefly getting locked and sees it as a signal to try and rekindle good feelings with dear leader and say its naawt twoooo.

this dude is such a narcissist he cant see any other reason for locking his thread other than it being for in his favor.

 

[Desktop User2]

@Dyn how hard is to wash off that contaminant for coke in a normal hygiene routine? I know they claim the kids were filthy but does it not come off after a bath? Does it persists after sample washing pre-test?

 

[Cirrhosis_of_Liver]

@Dyn how hard is to wash off that contaminant for coke in a normal hygiene routine? I know they claim the kids were filthy but does it not come off after a bath? Does it persists after sample washing pre-test?

If the kid got coke on their head, it would still be coke, not metabolites.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

(I'm sure he has/will)

I’m sure he has, especially considering he’s trying to get the can footage. It throws him right in the middle.

 

[Bonesjones]

Well, the alternative is that someone else ingested cocaine, and then that person's metabolites ended up in the child's hair.

What like saliva, from their parents kissing them on their head like parents do?

Oh, well, it goes from "lightly dusting exactly one (1) child with cocaine" and gets worse from there.

Its just funny watching everyone jump to conclusions because they have zero experience with drugs. We are talking people doing outlandish amounts of some of the messiest forms of drugs available. Even doing their best to avoid interaction or contamination, there's enough incidental contact to transfer small amounts over. It's like baking bread from scratch and realizing you've got flour in places you were nowhere near.

 

[Royal Reaper Wolf Prince]

THE COCAINE POWER LEVEL IS OVER 5000!!!

WHAT!? 5000!!!???

 

[Desktop User2]

IIRC, the judge mentioned it in the charges.

They omit it 42:00 to 44:00

Only 3 charges: possession, possession of firearms while under influence and the neglect or endangerment of a child (the same as Nick

 

[derpi]

I live in a place that has been hit particularly hard by the whole fentanyl problem (like everywhere else now it seems like), so I’ve been around plenty of people with very bad drug problems. Around here you have to be careful with any drug now, because they’re finding fentanyl in fucking everything, including cocaine, which would drop a grown adult, let alone a little girl (as if just unlaced cocaine is any better for a child to get their hands on). I hope Nick understands how lucky he is that that kid is even alive. On top of that, I’m sure even the worst junkies and irresponsible niggers that I know of would make absolutely sure that any child in the house couldn’t just find and get into their stash. Congrats, Nick. You went from super successful streamer to being lower than any local nigger I know of

Like 20 pages behind but what’s the likelihood Nick ever even considered testing his drugs for fentanyl? Test kits are readily available online

 

[Dyn]

@Dyn how hard is to wash off that contaminant for coke in a normal hygiene routine? I know they claim the kids were filthy but does it not come off after a bath? Does it persists after sample washing pre-test?

https://academic.oup.com/jat/article/43/7/543/5423761

Somebody who understands science better than me should look over the whole thing, they've narrowed down the metabolite ratios that suggest ingestion vs contamination, but if you get coke in your hair I'm gonna go ahead and guess that a bath probably won't get it out.

 

[Harm]

EDIT: This interpretation is incorrect, I'm retarded. Leaving this post so people who misinterpreted this similar to how I did can know this isn't the case.

So, Nick's hypothetical defense is that someone who was doing cocaine excreted bodily fluids (i.e. blood, urine, sweat) containing cocaine metabolites which can exist outside of the body, and then the 8 year old was exposed to these bodily fluids of a cocaine user so much and so often that the metabolites were absorbed by the child and specifically into their hair such that it matched with the amount of cocaine metabolites present in an adult indicating semi-regular cocaine usage, and only this one child out of the five?

So, the 8 year old was exposed to the bodily fluids (i.e. blood, sweat, urine) of a coke addict to the point that it's as if the child was semi-regularly doing cocaine herself?

And this is supposed to be the desirable outcome?