Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also interesting, none of the children tested for accidental exposure reach as high as Rekieta's child. She had over 5ng and even the highest in this chart has 3.75ng
At that amount for accidental exposure his kid would have had to be working in a fucking cocaine packaging plant in Bolivia.
And they wear masks, now I think of it. And gloves.
Theres just no way.
 
If she tested positive for norcocaine but not benzoylecglonine (which would have been metabolised in her body and should be far more abundant in a positive reading), then that's a sussy reading and Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.
A slide for a CHIPS conference by an employee of Minnesota Monitoring (the company mentioned in the order as the one Nick revoked the release from) specifies the latter as the most commonly tested metabolite.

(See the second point.)

minnesota_monitoring.png
https://cdn.ymaws.com/mcaa-mn.org/r...chips/2019_conference_materials/Testing_1.pdf
 
It’s been said, but it’s picograms. Per milligram of hair. And it’s metabolites. So the amount the child ingested could well have been tiny. The amount stuck to some gunmy bears she found, for example.
That makes sense tbh, I also posted my message half the fuck asleep so it explains why I said mg instead of PG lol

Nick needs to sober the fuck up and realize what dumb fucking bullshit he's gotten himself and his loved ones into.
 
Reading this is like reading a Doppler Radar where Nick is looking closely and seeing a heavy rain made by red and thinking "I can survive this". , but as we pan-out from the Doppler we see rare deep purple regions on the horizon showing God's Wrath is coming. That's CPS, the DA and the Judge, and they are bringing hell with them.

There is a storm coming; and while he thinks what he is experiencing currently is it, it ain't even close.
 
They omit it 42:00 to 44:00
Only 3 charges: possession, possession of firearms while under influence and the neglect or endangerment of a child (the same as Nick
Both of them are charged under neglect or endangerment of a child. Kayla is for some reason charged under (a) while Nick is charged under (b). Some people have speculated that it's a typo.

EDIT: Actually looking back, Nick's charge specifically only says endangerment. Kayla's charges has the neglect or endangerment language. Realistically it's the same thing though.
 
Last edited:
Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.
I think it was an honest attempt to be one. Marraige breaksdown, which was happening, mess with you. And it feels like he thought it would be easier and better if he stopped trying. He didn’t just stop trying to be a good person he stopped moreorless trying anything.
 
If she was ingesting cocaine frequently why just slap Kayla with Child abuse but not Nick as well? Could it be that Kayla was giving the child cocaine on purpose?
I've worked in different support groups before and have met an absurd amount of women who got slapped with a "failure to protect" when THEY reported that a dude was abusing their kids.


Tbf, Kayla might still be a shitbird, and not everything in the world can possibly sexism, but it's not unusual for some agents or DAs to look at one gender of parent more strictly than the other (I say gender because some states target men instead, which is just as fucked up).



That being said, idk why everyone's on the intentional drug use train when the only adults in the house are three strung out junkies. They are just as likely to have had no idea how she got into it.
 
Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.
Sometimes you have to sugar coat things a bit to not distress the normies or normie adjacent peeps. It would be a bit too blackpill to go with.

"The animal killing guy who was always a bit of a douchebag who never worked a day in his life became an EVEN WORSE piece of shit."

It sounds better to the less jaded if you don't go too hard with the close. When I was younger, I can't count the number of times that I was completely right but got burned because I hurt the feelings of normies by going to hard on the close. if you go too hard people get defensive and dig in.
 
This is no longer haha-funny. The gall to continue streaming and perform as an online figure is abhorrent.
If this shit was fake don't you think he'd either be like, breaking down crying for 10 days straight, or raging to high heaven or something?
Instead he's on stream saying "I don't have to prove anything to anyone." I think we all know what comes out next.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back