Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.The good man that was Nick Rekeita was destroyed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.The good man that was Nick Rekeita was destroyed.
No, just that she got cocaine residue in her hair.So, Nick's hypothetical defense is that someone who was doing cocaine excreted bodily fluids
At that amount for accidental exposure his kid would have had to be working in a fucking cocaine packaging plant in Bolivia.Also interesting, none of the children tested for accidental exposure reach as high as Rekieta's child. She had over 5ng and even the highest in this chart has 3.75ng
aaron said he brought it up with nick and nick said he had ways to testLike 20 pages behind but what’s the likelihood Nick ever even considered testing his drugs for fentanyl? Test kits are readily available online![]()
A slide for a CHIPS conference by an employee of Minnesota Monitoring (the company mentioned in the order as the one Nick revoked the release from) specifies the latter as the most commonly tested metabolite.If she tested positive for norcocaine but not benzoylecglonine (which would have been metabolised in her body and should be far more abundant in a positive reading), then that's a sussy reading and Nick has a decent argument that his kid wasn't actually using cocaine and was just around it so much that a fine dusting coats her at all times.
That makes sense tbh, I also posted my message half the fuck asleep so it explains why I said mg instead of PG lolIt’s been said, but it’s picograms. Per milligram of hair. And it’s metabolites. So the amount the child ingested could well have been tiny. The amount stuck to some gunmy bears she found, for example.
that takes a stronger sense of principals than Nick can muster. He's too far thrown to cooming and gooning.Nick needs to sober the fuck up and realize what dumb fucking bullshit he's gotten himself and his loved ones into.
Both of them are charged under neglect or endangerment of a child. Kayla is for some reason charged under (a) while Nick is charged under (b). Some people have speculated that it's a typo.They omit it 42:00 to 44:00
Only 3 charges: possession, possession of firearms while under influence and the neglect or endangerment of a child (the same as Nick
What a retarded defense. "No guise, I didn't give my kid cocaine, she was just exposed to it to the point where it got in her unwashed hair"No, just that she got cocaine residue in her hair.
yeah, in cohort 1 - the contaminated sample - it persists for at least the duration of the trial 8 weeks.View attachment 6103835
Somebody who understands science better than me should look over the whole thing, they've narrowed down the metabolite ratios that suggest ingestion vs contamination, but if you get coke in your hair I'm gonna go ahead and guess that a bath probably won't get it out.
I'm glad I was retarded and misconstruing. Still, that possibility seems foreclosed if the pdf found by @Balldo's Gate is correct and they did test for benzoylecglonine instead.No, just that she got cocaine residue in her hair.
I think it was an honest attempt to be one. Marraige breaksdown, which was happening, mess with you. And it feels like he thought it would be easier and better if he stopped trying. He didn’t just stop trying to be a good person he stopped moreorless trying anything.Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.
It literally is his worst day ever in ways he's incapable of realizingThat is what I believe is event zero that triggered the fall of Nick Rekieta. A story oldr than time. A man fails a shit test and it leads to his undoing.
I've worked in different support groups before and have met an absurd amount of women who got slapped with a "failure to protect" when THEY reported that a dude was abusing their kids.If she was ingesting cocaine frequently why just slap Kayla with Child abuse but not Nick as well? Could it be that Kayla was giving the child cocaine on purpose?
Yeah, a(2), you were right.Both of them are charged under neglect or endangerment of a child. Kayla is for some reason charged under (a) while Nick is charged under (b). Some people have speculated that it's a typo.
Damn ain't the human body a miraculous thing?I'm not a biologist but - which reactions happen outside of the body exactly?
Sometimes you have to sugar coat things a bit to not distress the normies or normie adjacent peeps. It would be a bit too blackpill to go with.Bro stop this. Nick was never a good man, he just pretended to be one.
If this shit was fake don't you think he'd either be like, breaking down crying for 10 days straight, or raging to high heaven or something?This is no longer haha-funny. The gall to continue streaming and perform as an online figure is abhorrent.