Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
During that time period, Kayla meets some guy in some Star Trek online game and has an emotional affair with him.
The funniest part of this whole deal is Nick getting cucked by a Trekkie.
Imagine being such a failure of a husband and a man that your wife seeks out a dude on the internet who probably just jerks it to goon edits of Deanna Troi all day.
 
Nick is a monster, has always been a monster, and the surest sign before any of his monsterings became public was his pursuit of e-fame as "wholesome family man." A contradiction in terms.
The best test is seeing if someone is willing to be held to higher standards than his audience. Nick seemed to want to get an audience to take his foot off the gas and live a rockstar degenerate life. If you want to be in a position of authority because you can handle displaying a higher standard that's one thing, if you want the fame and money to engage in hedonistic pleasures, something like this always comes out.
 
A slide for a CHIPS conference by an employee of Minnesota Monitoring (the company mentioned in the order as the one Nick revoked the release from) specifies the latter as the most commonly tested metabolite.

(See the second point.)

View attachment 6103853
https://cdn.ymaws.com/mcaa-mn.org/r...chips/2019_conference_materials/Testing_1.pdf
On the hair test slide they report testing for parent drug and metabolite but also claim there could be no contamination when testing for the metabolite. I dont know how they reported to CPS. The most charitable interpretation for Rekieta is that they tested positive for cocaine - the parent drug - and no metabolites and CPS reported as is - hence the wording Cocaine over 5000.

n.png

Edit: he could always release the test since we know by his tacit acknowledgement to Null it is true. His daughter was exposed to coke either way.
 
There’s three ways I could see the kid getting dosed

  1. Environment. Nick left a bullet around and the kid got it on them/ as the favorite she was the gopher and got dusted every so often.
  2. Kayla gave the kid a gummer because she heard Robin Williams felt normal on cocaine and the kid has ADD and Robin Williams had ADD. Kayla was a retard who shilled a CBD snake oil scam
  3. @MirnaMinkoff and @Null were right about the Lime in the Coconut/ Booze-laced with Cocaine and the kid would pretend to be a streamer in daddies balldo bunker
If Nick was a slob and left half drunk whisky glasses around, I think the kid might’ve drank them because kids do that. I used to drink my mom’s coffee as a kid because I was curious. One of my nieces will try to drink whatever her parents are drinking when she thinks they aren’t looking.

Also, I’ve been rewatching Metalocalypse and saw this when I was watching and it made me think of Nick.
IMG_1659.jpeg
 
but if you get coke in your hair I'm gonna go ahead and guess that a bath probably won't get it out.
Don't ask me where I read it, but I remember reading about a potential issue with certain kinds of shampoo and hair products that helped in embedding contaminants in the hair rather than washing them out, leading to false positive drug tests.
 
The funniest part of this whole deal is Nick getting cucked by a Trekkie.
Imagine being such a failure of a husband and a man that your wife seeks out a dude on the internet who probably just jerks it to goon edits of Deanna Troi all day.
So do you think the guy looked more like Geordi or Reginald Barclay? I can't decide which would be funnier.
 
just fyi dyn is probably the most qualified person to speak on this particular topic on the entire site and if he says there's no Rx that'd show up in the test I believe him.
One of the first thing CPS does is, wherever possible, contact the kids Dr's offices and pharmacies for medical records. They need to know what meds the kids are on for continuation of care. And to rule out things like this. I would think these lab results would have been comparred against a list of the child's known legal prescriptions before a report like this is filed into the system. But how CPS does things can vary wildly.
 
I think she may have simply asked for some cocaine, and Nick may have simply obliged.

As for why she would ask, and why Nick would oblige, there are many plausible explanations. Maybe she saw all the adults doing it, and felt left out, so she asked to be included, and Nick figured that it would be no big deal to give her some. Perhaps he did this in the name of "bonding"; she was his favorite, after all.

All that said, I still think sexual abuse is more likely; the subject has clearly been on his mind for the past few months.
 
Last edited:
We cannot make any scientific claim about single vs. multi exposure to cocaine from the report data that is currently available. That was the core of my reply and is why I provided example slides from hair test sectioning (a test which would give information on whether the child's cocaine consumption was a single event or was ongoing, and for how long)
Scientifically- yes.

But we know, from Nick's own admissions, that there was a single event in which his goddamn thieving kid stole a bunch of his cocaine. That's why he said "worst day ever"- he lost a bunch of coke at once and had to get more in a hurry- not "frustrating month where I swear my stash was going down faster than usual".
Thank you Dyn, very cool.
You don't get to reply to the guy who taste-tests new blends of Opal petrol on Reddit.
 
I have no idea why anyone ever thought Nick was a good man.
A lot of people seemed like they wanted someone to look up to. Nick basically had the perfect ideal life so they’d disregard him when he said he wasn’t perfect, he fought against people image of him constantly even when this situation wasn’t happening. But a lot of people refused to see it. And then you’ve got people that come in late or don’t stay for everything so do not see these bits. You saw it with Mindset and many others thanks to the Turkey Tom.doc many people didn’t know all this stuff. It’s not that Nick was trying to hide it per se, it’s just there was so much content and people only paid attention spradically that they missed stuff or did not know..

And they really wanted that image they’d made in their head. It’s why Metokur is so sad about everything. A perfrct guy with the best life seems to have just exploded out the blue.
 
Last edited:
The most charitable interpretation for Rekieta is that they tested positive for cocaine - the parent drug - and no metabolites and CPS reported as is - hence the wording Cocaine over 5000.
n.png

Edit: he could always release the test since we know by his tacit acknowledgement to Null it is true. His daughter was exposed to coke either way.
No.

That most charitable interpretation is 100% ruled out.

According to Null, Nick personally told him that what tested positive was a metabolite. Not the drug itself.

Specifically: "testing a metabolite which exists outside the body".

Screenshot_20240619-104351~2.png
(Ripped this screenshot from @Captain Manning)

What the fuck does he mean by "a metabolite which exists outside the body"? Funny story,

Go to the row third from bottom in the table from the below MPR article and see what metabolite is listed as having been detected in 28% of a sample of Minnesota lakes....

mpr.png
(Article)

Obviously, though, the detection threshold for studies like these is very, very, very, low, and obviously just swimming in a lake would not make you test positive for anything, but if you are a totally out of control narcissist desperate for the one weird trick to own the haters, then I could see him landing on something like this from a web search and latching onto it.

This kind of stupid argument is something I can see Rekieta latching onto at this juncture of total delusion on his part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back