Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Based on the way this was leaked could this entire report get thrown out if it went to trial due to jury bias or something? I know Nick is trying to get the warrant thrown out but could this get thrown out as well in the criminal and/or CPS trials because someone illegally leaked these?
No. This is a CPS case, not a trial. This is a purely administrative hearing, not a criminal one, and therefore is not entitled to a trial by jury. Even if this did come up in the criminal case, the only argument that could be made would be that he needs a venue chance, but even that would likely be denied.
 
its fucking bad when ralphs only cope is "w-well maybe somehow itll turn out this fucked up thing isnt true"
Kinochet is such a retarded niggerfaggot. I went into that clip expecting so much more and it was nothing.
seriously. even ralph in the clip was just trying to list ways he would have thought for someone to have done cocaine and is reticent to list methods that are unfortunate in this circumstance, with ralph expressing regret its come up. its borderline slanderous. not that im crying for ralph but kinochet is just a fucker.
 
My assumption is the kid go into the stash somehow and took a large dose and that's what they're picking up. What would be the point of intentionally and repeatedly giving coke to your fucking 9 year old? I can at least see the case for alcohol making them easier to deal with, but not fucking coke. Even for Nick, I just don't see what the point would be.
I'm not so sure, when you test hair you can get an estimate of usage patterns because of how metabolites are deposited throughout the hair as it grows. Obviously, lacking test results beyond what was said in the report makes this difficult to confirm.

As for why - I doubt Nick or Kayla were giving her cocaine. If the house was a cluttered mess, then chances are drugs would be lying around. Maybe she copied her parents, had a taste, and eventually it became a habit of her trying whatever her parents left out. Remember, you don't need to snort cocaine, you can basically ingest it however you want - she was probably licking it off her hands.

Regardless of what happened and how, the most charitable interpretation for Nick is that they neglected a 9 year old, and exposed them to highly addictive drugs.
 
Kids are sneaky, if they weren't outright snorting lines in front of her (which would be incredibly depraved) maybe she was spying on the adults consuming the dummy dust and figured why not try it when they inevitably passed out. Who knows, maybe she orally ingested it. The thing is cocaine tastes incredibly bitter, and any nine year old who touches some and puts their finger to their tongue is going to recoil in disgust immediately. Any way Nick tries to spin it, a child under his care testing positive for coke is pretty reprehensible for everyone involved.
 
did you review that paper posted by @Dyn? The cohort with the contaminated hair showed traces, I don´t know how much exposure and for how long would justify her numbers by environmental exposure.
I just cited the differentiation between parent drug and metabolite because the company made a point of saying so on their slide
I've reviewed it, but the issue is that what they've done is rub cocaine once into someone's head, and they compare the metabolites to the amount of cocaine after 2 days. The issue is, that we don't know that ratio, we don't know the time frame, we have 0 info for long term exposure. They did find some metabolism occurs, but they don't know the specifics. I suppose the company might do more specific tests in the future but that's on them.

Anyone saying "it's just exposure" is coping. You're looking at bare minimum, long term exposure of a small minor to small, but still significant amounts of cocaine. I know the question is "well, did Racket's make his daughter do coke" but the answer is already yes. By the sheer fact it's on her body, it's in her blood. It's going to be affecting her in some way.
If we can get the results and everything plays nicely, something like 124/182 (from the mass spec) >.1 it's exposure. <.3 it's use. But IF is a very big word here.
I'd imagine that, since it's specialised for exactly this, they have a formula or a way to "enlarge" the difference. For example, subtracting all the parts they have in common.
If that degree of manipulation with quantitative mass spec is common, It's out of my lab rat grade experience. I'm sure it's possible, but they'd probably just do Liquid Chromatography or something more gentle than GC and avoid breaking it down instead.
 
Nick is a hedonist who fancies himself an epicurean, hence getting schmammered on expensive whisky where Evan Williams would serve as well. I bet he overpays for his coke and ecstacy, too.

Both are self-regarding philosophies, but where the epicurean seeks a peaceful and enjoyable life, the hedonist pursues the most immediate pleasure without regard consequences. True epicureans either avoid having children to avoid unwanted responsibility, or do their best as parents, because a good child can be a joy. The hedonist impregnates because condoms suck and women in estrus are extra horny. They have lots of kids whom they ignore unless the kids can make them feel good. Many such cases of carefully crafted facebook posts to.uae the kiddoes to get that dopamine hit.

Any Rhodes scholars know which hormone cocaine acts on?

Uh, I do. It's one of the most addictive substances on the planet. People destroy their lives for the stuff because it makes you feel good. Really good. A lot of people get freaked out because they like it too much and never touch it more than once. But once is all it takes to get addicted. A child who wants those baggies full of coke will find a way. They're very sneaky and crafty.
It's hard enough keeping a kid out of the sweets. Source: trust me bro. And sugar doesn't hold a candle to moon sugar.
 
Yes, it's all a conspiracy, the Federal government feared this super based lawyer from Minnesota.

The of gang of four NSA, CIA, FBI, and DEA, kidnapped his 9 old child and brainwashed the child to plant coke in the Rekieta household. They definitely leaked this document as well to hurt Nicks case even more.

Get fucked, Nick and Kayla, fucking coke fiends.
 
If that degree of manipulation with quantitative mass spec is common, It's out of my lab rat grade experience. I'm sure it's possible, but they'd probably just do Liquid Chromatography or something more gentle than GC and avoid breaking it down instead.
These are court-admissible lab results.

Also, vapourisation is such a high temperature that there's no point in even measuring it. It atomises it - it's similar to those "lab tests" where they measure out millions of degrees.
 
Based on the way this was leaked could this entire report get thrown out if it went to trial due to jury bias or something? I know Nick is trying to get the warrant thrown out but could this get thrown out as well in the criminal and/or CPS trials because someone illegally leaked these?
This is a CPS investigation, not a criminal trial. You get hearings, case reviews, etc..MN CPS doesn’t have “trials” for situations like this. A report getting leaked doesn’t invalidate, there’s no concern about a jury being tainted by this information leaking. The only reason is can be a problem in a criminal case is because it could be prejudicial to a jury or potential jury pool, there’s no worry about it effecting a CPS investigation.

This information is available to any member of the public that wants to visit the courthouse. The only breach here is they took copies and uploaded them online, they are supposed to remain at the courthouse, but the information is not sealed, it’s a public record
 
Anyone saying "it's just exposure" is coping. You're looking at bare minimum, long term exposure of a small minor to small, but still significant amounts of cocaine. I know the question is "well, did Racket's make his daughter do coke" but the answer is already yes. By the sheer fact it's on her body, it's in her blood. It's going to be affecting her in some way.
That´s apparently the angle he is going for... funny enough that fucks the balldo washers yelling all day about false positives,
Just a question: the sample is gone, right? They cant test if it was from the person they claim it was? Because there´s another cope about misidentified samples.
 
When I first heard about this story this morning, my first instinct was this but the reality is, it's not that hard to do coke. What's difficult about it? You take it out with a spoon, dump it on the table, make a little line, grab a straw and go to town. It's truly not that difficult. Especially if mommy and daddy are giving demonstrations every night. It's not heroine where you have to inject it. Hell, even weed you need to grind and pack. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out, especially if they left everything on the table.

If I'm Lil Wurmple, and I decide I wanna be like Mommy and Daddy, boom, make a line with a piece of paper, grab a straw or just roll up that same paper, and BAM. Baby's First Line. It's not like their kids didn't see this stuff. It's not like they didn't walk around the house with it on their noses. Sure Nick wiped up but he still had residue. I'm sure they're not that careful when cameras are off. I'm sure these kids could put two and two together.
This reminds me of a Waylon Jennings story, although it could be apocryphal. Apparently, Waylon got clean after watching his son, Shooter, use business cards to chop up powdered sugar or baby powder or something like that, and Shooter then made them into lines. I can’t remember if Shooter pretended to snort it or not. Subsequently, Shooter said, “Look, I’m just like daddy.”

I share this story as an example of a situation I could see as plausible way the 9-year-old could have been exposed to cocaine on a consistent basis. I would not be surprised to find out that Nick and Kayla prepared and snorted cocaine in front of the kids; I would not be surprised if the 9-year-old wanted to emulate her parents; and furthermore, I would not be surprised if she decided on multiple occasions to use the cards her parents used to chop up the cocaine because she thinks it looks like fun. In this wild speculation, the remaining question would be how the cocaine gets in her system after playing with it. If the cocaine is on her hands, I don’t find it implausible to end up in her system after doing that. However, this is all just speculation.
 
Kids are sneaky, if they weren't outright snorting lines in front of her (which would be incredibly depraved) maybe she was spying on the adults consuming the dummy dust and figured why not try it when they inevitably passed out. Who knows, maybe she orally ingested it. The thing is cocaine tastes incredibly bitter, and any nine year old who touches some and puts their finger to their tongue is going to recoil in disgust immediately. Any way Nick tries to spin it, a child under his care testing positive for coke is pretty reprehensible for everyone involved.
Someone earlier in the thread or in a comment somewhere theorized that when the kid complained of hunger, an adult may have given her some coke to make her not be hungry. We can reasonably combine some speculation here I think. Let's say Kayla is tripping on ketamine, the kid comes in saying she's hungry. Kayla gets pissed and reaches up to the nightstand, rubs some coke on her gums and says here you won't be hungry now. The kid feels funny and silly, sees where she got it from, then sneaks to get more from then on. Apologies if someone has said this already, thread moves lightning fast. Edit: the coke would make her mouth numb which I'm sure she would think is such a weird feeling that she might be like whoa I wonder if that would happen again, etc. Taste wouldn't have much to do with it I don't think (yes it's bitter but numbness sets in almost immediately)
 

Attachments

  • pedotroon.png
    pedotroon.png
    379.3 KB · Views: 21
These are court-admissible lab results.

Also, vapourisation is such a high temperature that there's no point in even measuring it. It atomises it - it's similar to those "lab tests" where they measure out millions of degrees.
Well yeah, it’s “molecularized” so that it can fly but you still want to preserve the larger groups. There are gentler procedures than GC.

That´s apparently the angle he is going for... funny enough that fucks the balldo washers yelling all day about false positives,
Just a question: the sample is gone, right? They cant test if it was from the person they claim it was? Because there´s another cope about misidentified samples.
The hair sample is digested unless these dudes happen to be specialized in mummy hair GCMS and located in Kairo. It’s gone.

But they can literally test again? It’s just hair. The whole reason the mummy dudes use a laser is because Mummies don’t exactly have a great hairline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back