Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Fields Of Rye]

That they cant properly distinguish between metabolite and parent drug, I seriously doubt... if it was a garage company, perhaps.

My dude, have you ever worked with a mass spec? I'm not doing this as a "reddit, trust the science" fag, I'm saying this as someone actually trained on one. MS breaks the drug into chunks at it's weakest points, VERY FREQUENTLY these will literally be the same as the metabolites.

When you do this quantitatively, you chose the largest peak and compare it to a known amount of another chemical (typically a very stable one) you put in there. In this case, 82, which is a pretty big fucking peak, is on both of them and while yes, both of these have distinct peaks, they both share the same peak and that's the largest for cocaine AND present for both of the metabolites (2 major for cocaine)




I'm not saying the company couldn't I'm saying there's literally no reason to distinguish. If it's on the skin, there will be a metabolite. Both of them will appear strongly and additively at 82, and that's assuming that the larger peaks made it through both the GC and the digestion. When I say GC is hot I mean well above the boiling point of water, well at the point that the uncatalyzed spontaneous decomp of biologically active drugs is expected. That's after a bath with hydroxide at 95C (don't quote me on that) which is enough to digest wood. 82 is just safer for the poor bastard doing 100 of these a day.

I'm sure they could go back and make sure but there's no reason. If there's cocaine on your fucking hair you are obviously taking cocaine. It will literally absorb through your skin.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Unless new charges are brought, that test looks bad but really has no bearing on custody/criminal case.

Well, yes and no.

Currently we are not aware of the test being used as probable cause for an additional charge, however that doesn't mean that the prosecutor won't try to use it as evidence for the neglect charge should it go to trial. It also doesn't mean that the police won't use the test as reasonable suspicion or probable cause to investigate other, potentially criminal matters in more depth, which could yield more charges later. Obviously we don't know if that's the case and won't know unless more charges are filed and the PC affidavit specifically mentions the test.

As for the custody case, the test is absolutely significant, because it already is being used in proceedings against the Rekietas. It was literally used as evidence in the hearing which determined that the children remain separated from their parents. Now it wasn't the only evidence presented, but it obviously was a key point presented by the KCHHS.

 

[Snuckening2]

Honestly the worst case scenario is that they were actually abusing that child and giving her drugs and alcohol in order to make her pliable.

No way did she accidentally come in contact with it while the other children didn't to test for medium use. With the high amount she must have taken (remember those numbers are for adults and she's 9) there's no way this was a "mom confused the pill" or "she found it and tasted it" situation.

This is the first explanation I thought of too, for those high test levels. I wouldn't want to make a positive accusation without more solid evidence. But realistically, the possibility is on the table.

I could buy that maybe a 9yo kid got into the parent's room, and tried out Daddy's special powder one time, out of curiousity. But if the test levels reflect repeated use, that's not something I could see a kid that age doing alone; 9yo girls in rural Minnesota don't pick up coke habits, all by themselves. Even with easy access and dysfunctional parents, that may be plausible for a teenager, but not a goddam 9yo.

But while I don't want to make that kind of accusation on such thin evidence, my gut doesn't feel good about this; A 9yo girl, in that debauched, neglected living situation, would be a prime candidate for that kind of abuse- Not even just from Nick, but there's also the three other swingers. Plus whatever other adults never went on-camera, but were still hanging around the house, partying with the Rekietas. From the kind of neglect we're hearing about, it sounds like those kids were exposed to potential harm, from a half-dozen possible angles.

I really hope I'm wrong. Such an insanely fucked-up situation.

 

[Truly Rural]

testing a metabolite which exists outside the body

His claim is that whatever test returned positive for is present in the environment. Wait for it .... it's from chemtrails.

 

[Oxyjen]

that.

Could Nick, convinced of his genius as always, have decided that cocaine was the best way to fix his most troublesome child's behavior? Its not impossible. I mean look what coke did for him and his wife.

Sorry if I’m late but is this the same child that he claimed was extremely violent and possibly gave him the black eye?

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I'm sure they're not that careful when cameras are off.

They weren’t even careful when cameras were on. It was Nick coming on stream clear high af that the warrent kept going on about.

They absolutely weren’t careful when stuff was off.

 

[Doctor Love]

Both of them will appear strongly and additively at 82, and that's assuming that the larger peaks made it through both the GC and the digestion.

I'd imagine that, since it's specialised for exactly this, they have a formula or a way to "enlarge" the difference. For example, subtracting all the parts they have in common.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Wait am I reading this right? this is saying the 9-year-old's hair tested positive for cocaine at levels consistent with regular/daily use? and the other kids didn't?
How does that factor in with the assumption that she wasn't personally using (ie is it easy enough to just kinda pick up that material from living in the house with it, or does this indicate that she got into the coke pile?)
Father of the year, rackets. keep it up. proud of you.

Rackets showed his kid how to do a line and then gave the kid a line of their very own.

 

[Desktop User2]

I'm sure they could go back and make sure but there's no reason. If there's cocaine on your fucking hair you are obviously taking cocaine.

did you review that paper posted by @Dyn? The cohort with the contaminated hair showed traces, I don´t know how much exposure and for how long would justify her numbers by environmental exposure.
I just cited the differentiation between parent drug and metabolite because the company made a point of saying so on their slide. You would guess by that there is chance for contamination.

 

[PlumpPimp]

The only mixup/contamination I can see is from hugging/close contact. Some of Kayla's hair strands ended up on the 9 y/o's head. We've all seen it on clothes. I think it would have to actually be strands of Kayla's hair ending up in the sample rather than a sample mixup.

A mix up of the sames is impossible because:

• Samples for drug tests are taken one-on-one with a professional who immediately seals the sample in a tamper proof bag.
• When collecting hair for drug testing you literally cut a tuft of hair off the patients head.

Source: I used to drug test doctors and football players who partied too hard.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

He messages me out of the blue to say two things:
1. To thank me for locking his thread.
2. To deny that his child tested positive for cocaine.

He claims the test is faulty, is testing a metabolite which exists outside of the body, and also that the levels of cocaine they are suggesting she had in her would indicate that she should be dead.

I absolutely adore that his ego is so big he thought you locked it for his sake.

 

[Cirrhosis_of_Liver]

A slide for a CHIPS conference by an employee of Minnesota Monitoring (the company mentioned in the order as the one Nick revoked the release from) specifies the latter as the most commonly tested metabolite.

(See the second point.)

View attachment 6103853
https://cdn.ymaws.com/mcaa-mn.org/r...chips/2019_conference_materials/Testing_1.pdf

I uhhhh I had a box of benzoylecgomine, for making pierogi you know, and I dropped it on her head.

She said she was fine!

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

I could buy that maybe a 9yo kid got into the parent's room, and tried out Daddy's special powder one time, out of curiousity. But if the test levels reflect repeated use, that's not something I could see a kid that age doing alone; 9yo girls in rural Minnesota don't pick up coke habits, all by themselves. Even with easy access and dysfunctional parents, that may be plausible for a teenager, but not a goddam 9yo.

Uh, I do. It's one of the most addictive substances on the planet. People destroy their lives for the stuff because it makes you feel good. Really good. A lot of people get freaked out because they like it too much and never touch it more than once. But once is all it takes to get addicted. A child who wants those baggies full of coke will find a way. They're very sneaky and crafty.

 

[Random Internet Person]

 

[gang weeder]

This is the first explanation I thought of too, for those high test levels. I wouldn't want to make a positive accusation without more solid evidence. But realistically, the possibility is on the table.

I could buy that maybe a 9yo kid got into the parent's room, and tried out Daddy's special powder one time, out of curiousity. But if the test levels reflect repeated use, that's not something I could see a kid that age doing alone; 9yo girls in rural Minnesota don't pick up coke habits, all by themselves. Even with easy access and dysfunctional parents, that may be plausible for a teenager, but not a goddam 9yo.

But while I don't want to make that kind of accusation on such thin evidence, my gut doesn't feel good about this; A 9yo girl, in that debauched, neglected living situation, would be a prime candidate for that kind of abuse- Not even just from Nick, but there's also the three other swingers. Plus whatever other adults never went on-camera, but were still hanging around the house, partying with the Rekietas. From the kind of neglect we're hearing about, it sounds like those kids were exposed to potential harm, from a half-dozen possible angles.

I really hope I'm wrong. Such an insanely fucked-up situation.

My assumption is the kid go into the stash somehow and took a large dose and that's what they're picking up. What would be the point of intentionally and repeatedly giving coke to your fucking 9 year old? I can at least see the case for alcohol making them easier to deal with, but not fucking coke. Even for Nick, I just don't see what the point would be.

 

[Hot Dog]

Based on the way this was leaked could this entire report get thrown out if it went to trial due to jury bias or something? I know Nick is trying to get the warrant thrown out but could this get thrown out as well in the criminal and/or CPS trials because someone illegally leaked these?

 

[Desktop User2]

View attachment 6104183


View attachment 6104185

HE LOST RALPH????????????

 

[Harm]

View attachment 6104183


View attachment 6104185

Kinochet is such a retarded niggerfaggot. I went into that clip expecting so much more and it was nothing.

 

[National Defense Advocate]

Based on the way this was leaked could this entire report get thrown out if it went to trial due to jury bias or something? I know Nick is trying to get the warrant thrown out but could this get thrown out as well in the criminal and/or CPS trials because someone illegally leaked these?

I doubt it, CPS doesn't work like the legal system. I can't imagine they'd just shrug and disregard the findings, even if they were leaked to the public.

Hard drugs is a huge no go.

 

[Doctor Love]

A child who wants those baggies full of coke will find a way. They're very sneaky and crafty.

Yes, dealers have to be very wary of the children who Ed Edd n Eddy their way for a rock.

Ralph was actually surprisingly reasonable. This guy actually seems even worse than Ralph!