No normal person could afford to display coke in a manner to be confused with sugar - in a bowl, pot, etc. You would imagine it could fool a 9 yo if it was a pot containing a 100g minimum of powder. A 9yo wouldn´t think a bullet or 3g of coke in a baggy is sugar.
This is what’s been bothering me. That 5000 number is awfully high. Would eating cocaine, short of being a drug mule, produce those numbers? Cocaine is not something that is easy to get into your system. There is some contact absorption, but not really that much. is there some drug sub genre of “cooking with cocaine” that I’ve never heard of? I thought at most it’s like licking Lidocaine.
Supposedly, if they have a long enough hair.
I think dosing as @Marchesa of the Vast suggested is more likely. If surface contamination was an issue I would expect every kid to test hot, not just the one (I don't know how readily cocaine can be absorbed dermally). I'm not sure if anything's been said about where specifically the coke was found, but if the parents or a guest aren't just straight up spiking the kid's food and/or drinks with it then maybe she's been finding it lying about and putting it on things mistaking it for sugar or something. I think for a 9yo it's at least plausible they'd mistake the two. In my head that's the best-case scenario. Worst-case is, again, she's been provided it intentionally.It means that either the kid got into the stash on purpose or that enough residue accumulated on surfaces to transfer
Both give big sadsfuck you Rackets
It is a virtual certainty that I am right. I did pretty extensive research on this and, in short, the law is very clear that the responsible agency and court must search for relatives, and, if necessary, provide legal, financial, and administrative assistance so the relatives can obtain a license and qualify for all applicable state, local, and federal assistance programs. In fact, it specifically says that, if for whatever reason, the children's best interests are that they are placed with a relative that cannot be licensed as a foster parent, the requirement should be waived before placing them with non-relative licensed foster parents.
I like to think Lady Rackets got really experimental, mixed that shit into her hair-care product and lathered it in there nice and juicy for months on end.
No dumbass, cocaine is not at all like sugar, even powdered sugar. It’s usually yellowish.
I heard that coke actually numbs the tounge. When coke and crack were at it's peak, that's how police officers comfirmed it was coke before they had the tech to do field testing. They took the tiniest little bit and if it numbed their tounge they knew it was coke.
The problem is, and this is a misunderstanding I'm seeing a lot, as @trash cat keeps posting she's in the 10th percentile of levels. What he has I think failed to clearly impress is that is the lowest, the bottom 10% (barely, 20th percentile starts at 5700) of habitual users. So it's a high level, exponentially more than you would absorb from, say, incidentally touching daddy's bathroom counter and then rubbing your eyes, but it's nowhere near the upper bound a person can reasonably ingest.
Weird as it sounds, that is a specific set of statutes carved out to refer only to meth. Read the definitions and you will see "chemical substance" is defined for the sole purpose of this passage as a chemical substance "used as a precursor in the manufacture of methamphetamine or any other chemical intended to be used in the manufacture of methamphetamine".
